Advertisement

Finite Element Elastoplastic and Limit Analysis: Some Consistency Criteria and Their Implications

  • L. Corradi
  • G. Maier

Summary

The formulation of element elastic-plastic laws is considered in the framework of the displacement approach. The finite element model is regarded as an actually discrete system, composed of a finite number of parts whose individual behaviour is described in terms of generalized stresses and strains. A general procedure for formulating the element laws is proposed, and it is shown that some commonly used formulations of finite element elastic-plastic analysis can be recovered on the basis of particular assumptions. It is pointed out that these formulations may violate some “consistency” requirements, which are discussed in the paper; these violations may explain some of the inaccuracies experienced in computations. A fairly general method for restoring consistency is proposed. The implications of some of the approximations involved are also discussed, with particular reference to the limit analysis problem. Simple examples illustrate the effects of lack of consistency.

Keywords

Finite Element Model Gauss Point Generalize Strain Displacement Model Collapse Load 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nayak, G.C.; Zienkiewicz, O.C.: Elastic-plastic stress analysis. A Generalization for various constitutive relations including strain softening. Int. J. Num. Meth. Engrg., 5, (1972), 113–135.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zienkiewicz, O.C.: The finite element method. McGraw-Hill, London, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Besseling, J.F.: The force method and its application in plasticity problems. Computers and Structures, 8, (1978) 323–330.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Besseling, J.F.: Finite element method. 53–78, in: Trends in Solid Mechanics, Besseling and van der Heijden edts., Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Argyris, J.H.: Continua and discontinua. 11–189, in: Proc. 1st Conf. on Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics, Dayton, Ohio, AFFDL TR. 66. 80, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scharpf, D.W.: A new method of stress calculation in the matrix displacement analysis. Computers and Structures, 8, (1978) 465–477.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maier, G.: A matrix structural theory of piecewiselinear plasticity with interacting yield planes. Meccanica, 5 (1970) 54–66.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Corradi, L.: On compatible finite element models for elastic plastic analysis. Meccanica, 13 (1978) 133–150.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Corradi, L.: On some “consistent” finite element approximations in non-linear structural analysis. Proc. 5th ALMETA Conference, Palermo, Italy, Oct. 1980.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corradi, L.; Gioda, G.: On the finite element modelling of elastic-plastic behaviour with reference to geotechnical problems. 1st. Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods for Non-Linear Problems, Swansea, U.K. Sept.1980.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin, J.: Plasticity. MIT Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dang Hung, N.; König, J.A.: A finite element formulation of the shakedown problem using a yield criterion of the mean. Corp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg., 8 (1976) 179–192.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hodge, P.G. Jr.: A Consistent finite element model for the two-dimensional continuum. Ingenieur Archiv, 39 (1970) 375–383.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cohn, M.Z.; Maier, G. Eds.: Engineering Plasticity by Mathematical Programming. Pergamon Press, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dang Hung, N.; Trapletti, M.; Ransart, D.: Bornes quasi inférieures et bornes supérieures de la pression de ruine de coques de révolution par la méthode des éléments finis et par la prograuimiation nonlinéare Int. J. Nonlinear Mech., 13 (1979) 79–102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Corradi
    • 1
  • G. Maier
    • 1
  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations