Finite Element Elastoplastic and Limit Analysis: Some Consistency Criteria and Their Implications
The formulation of element elastic-plastic laws is considered in the framework of the displacement approach. The finite element model is regarded as an actually discrete system, composed of a finite number of parts whose individual behaviour is described in terms of generalized stresses and strains. A general procedure for formulating the element laws is proposed, and it is shown that some commonly used formulations of finite element elastic-plastic analysis can be recovered on the basis of particular assumptions. It is pointed out that these formulations may violate some “consistency” requirements, which are discussed in the paper; these violations may explain some of the inaccuracies experienced in computations. A fairly general method for restoring consistency is proposed. The implications of some of the approximations involved are also discussed, with particular reference to the limit analysis problem. Simple examples illustrate the effects of lack of consistency.
KeywordsFinite Element Model Gauss Point Generalize Strain Displacement Model Collapse Load
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Zienkiewicz, O.C.: The finite element method. McGraw-Hill, London, 1977.Google Scholar
- 4.Besseling, J.F.: Finite element method. 53–78, in: Trends in Solid Mechanics, Besseling and van der Heijden edts., Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1979.Google Scholar
- 5.Argyris, J.H.: Continua and discontinua. 11–189, in: Proc. 1st Conf. on Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics, Dayton, Ohio, AFFDL TR. 66. 80, 1966.Google Scholar
- 9.Corradi, L.: On some “consistent” finite element approximations in non-linear structural analysis. Proc. 5th ALMETA Conference, Palermo, Italy, Oct. 1980.Google Scholar
- 10.Corradi, L.; Gioda, G.: On the finite element modelling of elastic-plastic behaviour with reference to geotechnical problems. 1st. Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods for Non-Linear Problems, Swansea, U.K. Sept.1980.Google Scholar
- 11.Martin, J.: Plasticity. MIT Press, 1975.Google Scholar
- 14.Cohn, M.Z.; Maier, G. Eds.: Engineering Plasticity by Mathematical Programming. Pergamon Press, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
- 15.Dang Hung, N.; Trapletti, M.; Ransart, D.: Bornes quasi inférieures et bornes supérieures de la pression de ruine de coques de révolution par la méthode des éléments finis et par la prograuimiation nonlinéare Int. J. Nonlinear Mech., 13 (1979) 79–102.Google Scholar