Advertisement

Extensions of Beam Foil Spectroscopy

Chapter
Part of the Topics in Current Physics book series (TCPHY, volume 5)

Abstract

The key advantage of beam-foil spectroscopy over alternative methods of studying related atomic properties is its simple, straightforward application to the direct determination of lifetimes of excited states of atoms and ions through measurements of the decay in flight of such particles in beams of well-defined and easily measured velocity. The linear relation between velocity (~1 cm ns−1) and time after excitation in a thin target (thickness ~ a few hundred Å, transit time ~10−14 s) allows good measurements of macroscopic radiation decay lengths ~1 cm in the laboratory and equivalent fractional accuracy in the determination of lifetimes ~1 ns of excited ions undergoing decay in flight. Through such lifetime measurements, related quantities like transition probabilities, or equivalently, oscillator strengths for dominant decay modes, can frequently be established to accuracies limited by various systematic effects (e.g., target aging effects) to errors of a few percent or less. Fig.7.1 displays a typical decay in flight curve for the ~0.54 ns 11P0−23P1 inter-combination transition in heliumlike fluorine, measured in our laboratory by MOWAT et al. [7.1] a few years ago. This particular curve illustrates the principle of differential metastability, in that the fast decays of, for example, the unresolved resonance transition 11S0−21P1 had initially died out at the slight decay times after excitation corresponding to the leftmost data point shown. The longer-lived cascade feeding transitions which eventually dominate at points far downstream are sufficiently weak in the primary decay region of interest to permit an approximate background subtraction from the upstream portion of the curve. Establishment of the beam-velocity independence of the fitted lifetime (within experimental errors) for the upstream portion of the curve is an important test of the adequacy of this kind of background subtraction procedure. In this regard the measurement of metastable state decays, which arise through the violation of some selection rule whose magnitude is frequently the object of measurement, is often eased by the tendency of these decays to outlive all but very weak, long-lived cascade transitions which rarely repopulate the metastable state.

Keywords

Lifetime Measurement Hollow Cathode Discharge Auger Line Auger Decay Auger Electron Emission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 7.1
    J.R. Mowat, I.A. Sellin, R.S. Peterson, D.J. Pegg, M.D. Brown, J.R. Macdonald: Phys. Rev. A 8, 145 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 7.2
    I. Martinson: Beam Foil Spectroscopy, ed. by S. Bashkin, Topics in Current Physics, Vol. 1 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1976) pp. 33–57 7.3 S.L. Varghese, C.L. Cocke, B. Curnutte: Phys. Rev. A 14, 1729 (1976)Google Scholar
  3. 7.4
    H.W. Kugel, M. Leventhal, D.E. Murnick, C.K.N. Patel,—U.R. Wood, II: Beam Foil Spectroscopy, Vol. 2, ed. by I.A. Sellin and D.J. Pegg ( Plenum, New York 1976 ) pp. 815–827Google Scholar
  4. 7.5
    I.A. Sellin, S.B. Elston, J.P. Forester, P.M. Griffin, D.J. Pegg, R.S. Peterson, R.S. Thoe, C.R. Vane, J.J. Wright, K.-0. Groeneveld, F. Chen, R. Laubert: Phys. Lett. 61A, 107 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 7.6
    L.J. Curtis: Beam Foil Spectroscopy, ed. by S. Bashkin, Topics in Current Phy-Physics, Vol. 1 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1976 ) pp. 63–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.7
    D.J. Pegg, S.B. Elston, P.M. Griffin, H.C. Hayden, J.P. Forester, R.S. Thoe,R.S. Peterson, I.A. Sellin: Phys. R.v. A 14, 1036 (1976)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I.A. Sellin: Beam Foil Spectroscopy,ed. by S. Bashkin, Topics in Current Phy-Physics, Vol. 1 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1976) pp. 265–295 7.9 I.S. Dmitriev, V.S. Nikolaev: Zh. Eksper. I. Teor. Fiz. 47, 615 (1964) [Sov.Phys. - JETP 20, 409 (1964)]Google Scholar
  8. 7.10
    J.B. Marion, F.C. Young: Nuclear Reaction Analysis - Graphs and Tables ( North--Holland, Amsterdam 1968 )Google Scholar
  9. 7.11
    J.A. Martin: unpublished (1970)Google Scholar
  10. 7.12
    P.H. Stelson: Beam Foil Spectroscopy, Vol. 1, ed. by I.A. Sellin and D.J. Pegg (Plenum, New York 1976 ) pp. 401–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 7.13
    H.-D. Betz: Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 465 (1972)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 7.
    L. Barrette: unpublished (1975)Google Scholar
  13. 7.15
    E. Knystautas, R. Drouin: Beam Foil Spectroscopy, Vol. 1, ed. by I.A. Sellin and D.J. Pegg (Plenum, New York 1976 ) pp. 377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 7.16
    H.-D. Betz, F. Bell, H. Panke, G. Kalkolten, M. Welz, D. Evers: Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 807 (1974)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 7.17
    H. Panke, F. Bell, H.-D. Betz, W. Stehling, E. Spinder, R. Laubert: unpublished (1975)Google Scholar
  16. 7.18
    P. Erman: Physica Scripta 11, 65 (1975)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 7.19
    L.W. Dotchin, E.C. Chupp, D.J. Pegg: J. Chem. Phys. 59, 3960 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 7.20
    L.J. Curtis, P. Erman: private communication and to be published in J.O.S.A. (1977)Google Scholar
  19. 7.21
    R. Mann: unpublished thesis; R. Mann, R. Peterson, F. Folkmann, G. Szabo, K.O. Groeneveld: Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 22, 610 (1977)Google Scholar
  20. 7.22
    J.P. Buchet, M. Druetta: J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 991 (1975)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 7.23
    J.R. Mowat, I.A. Sellin, D.J. Pegg, R.S. Peterson, J.R. Macdonald, M.D. Brown: Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1289 (1974)Google Scholar
  22. 7.
    J.R. Mowat, I.A. Sellin, D.J. Pegg, R. Laubert, R.L. Kauffman, M.D. Brown, J.R.Macdonald, P. Richard: Phys. Rev. A 10, 1446 (1974), and references thereinGoogle Scholar
  23. 7.25
    R. Kauffman, C.W. Woods, K.A. Jamison, P. Richard: Phys. Lett. A 50, 117 (1974)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 7.26
    I.A. Sellin, C.R. Vane, S.B. Elston, J.P. Forester, P.M. Griffin, D. J. Pegg,R.S. Thoe,’K.-0. Groeneveld, R. Laubert, F. Chen: Phys. Lett. 61A 107 (1977)Google Scholar
  25. 7.27
    M.E. Rudd, J. Macek: Case Studies in Atomic Physics, Vol. III, No. 2, ed. By M.A.C. McDowell and E.W. McDaniel ( North-Holland, Amsterdam 1972 ) pp. 47–136Google Scholar
  26. 7.28
    K.D. Sevier: Low Energy Electron Spectroscopy ( Wiley, New York 1973 )Google Scholar
  27. 7.
    J. Electron. Spectros. 1, 1 (1972 to present)Google Scholar
  28. 7.30
    J.R. Mowat, I.A. Sellin, D.J. Pegg, R.S. Peterson, M.D. Brown, J.R. Macdonald: Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 128 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 7.31
    L.C. Northcliffe, R.F. Schilling: Nuclear Data Tables A 7, No. 3–4 (1970)Google Scholar
  30. 7.
    V.V. Zashkvara, M.I. Korsunkskii, O.D. Komachev: Zh. Tekn. Fiz. 36, 132 (1966) [Soy. Phys. 11, 96 (1966)]Google Scholar
  31. 7.33
    P. Dahl, M. 11Vdbro, B. Fastrup, M.E. Rudd: J. Phys. B 9, 1567 (1976)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 7.34
    D.J. Pegg, H.H. Haselton, R.S. Thoe, P.M. Griffin, M.D. Brown, I.A. Sellin: Phys. Rev. A 12, 1330 (1975)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. 7.35
    R. Bruch, G. Paul, H.J. Andrä: Phys. Rev. A 12, 1908 ( 1975 ); R. Bruch: Thesis, unpublished (1976)Google Scholar
  34. 7.
    N. Stolterfoht: Abstracts of the Ninth International Conference on the Physics of Electronic and Atomic Collisions, Vol. 1, ed. by J.S. Risley and R. Geballe (University of Washington, Seattle 1975) p. 419, and references thereinGoogle Scholar
  35. 7.37
    H.H. Haselton, R.S. Thoe, J.R. Mowat, P.M. Griffin, D.J. Pegg, I.A. Sellin: Phys. Rev. A 11, 468 (1975)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 7.38
    I.S. Dmitriev, V.S. Nikolaev, Y.A. Teplova: Phys. Lett. A 26, 122 (1968)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 7.39
    P. Feldman, R. Novick: Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 278 (1963); Phys. Rev. 160 143 (1967)Google Scholar
  38. 7.40
    M. Levitt, R. Novick, P. Feldman: Phys. Rev. A 3, 130 (1971)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 7.41
    S.T. Manson: Phys. Lett. 23, 315 (1966)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 7.42
    V.V. Balashov, V.S. Senas1nko, B. Tekou: Phys. Lett. A 25, 487 (1967)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 7.43
    K.T. Cheng, C.P. Lin, W.R. Johnson: Phys. Lett. A 48, 437 (1974)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  42. 7.
    R. Schumann: Thesis, unpublished (1976); R. Schumann, K.-0. Groeneveld: private communicationGoogle Scholar
  43. 7.45
    M.H. Chen, B. Crasemann: Phys. Rev. A 12, 959 (1975)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  44. 7.46
    D.L. Matthews, B.M. Johnson, C.F. Moore: Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 15, 41 (1975)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  45. 7.47
    D.J. Pegg, I.A. Sellin, P.M. Griffin, W.W. Smith: Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1615 (1972)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 7.48
    M. ROdbro, R. Bruch, P. Bisgaard: private communication, and to be published (1977)Google Scholar
  47. 7.49
    I.A. Sellin, R. Mann, H.J. Frischkorn, D. Rosich, S. Schumann, Gy. Szabo: Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 22, 1320 (1977)Google Scholar
  48. 7.50
    R.B. Barker, H.W. Berry: Phys. Rev. 151, 14 (1966)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1978

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations