Advertisement

Modeling the Primary Productivity of the World

  • Helmut Lieth
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 14)

Abstract

The many problems of energy and nutrient flow and their relationship to the structure of communities and potential for harvest make primary productivity interesting. The correlation between the productivity and character of vegetation cover, and the potential for agriculture and the environmental aspects of cultural development, have created additional interest. This volume emphasizes the fact that assessment of primary productivity is a time-consuming and expensive procedure. In some cases, it is even logistically impossible to measure the current productivity rate directly. Under such circumstances, one is inclined to look for indirect ways to estimate the productive capacity of any given region. The most feasible approach to the task is the elaboration of models that predict productivity from environmental parameters that have been measured in a reasonably dense network over the world.

Keywords

Primary productivity terrestrial ecosystems global modeling environmental correlation models precipitation temperature evapotranspiration vegetation period computer model global pattern 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Art, H. W., and P. L. Marks. 1971. A summary table of biomass and net annual primary production in forest ecosystems of the world. In Forest Biomass Studies, H. E. Young, ed., pp. 3–34. (Int. Union of Forest Res. Organizations Conf. Sect. 25, Gainesville, Florida.) Orono, Maine: Univ. of Maine, Life Sciences and Agriculture Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  2. Drozdov, A. V. 1971. The productivity of zonal terrestrial plant communities and the moisture and heat parameters of an area. Soviet Geogr. Rev. Transl. 12: 54–60.Google Scholar
  3. Dudnik, E. E. 1972. SYMAP Manual. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Laboratory of Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis, Graduate School of Design, Harvard Univ.Google Scholar
  4. Ewel, T. 1971a. Biomass changes in early tropical forest succession.Turrialba 21: 110–112.Google Scholar
  5. —. 1971b. Ph.D. thesis, Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Univ. of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  6. Geiger, R. 1965. World Atmosphere Series of Maps, Map No. WA6: Annual Effective Evapotranspiration. Darmstadt: Justus Perthes.Google Scholar
  7. Gessner, F. 1959. Hydrobotanik, Vol. 2. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  8. Jordan, C. F. 1971. Productivity of a tropical forest and its relation to a world pattern of energy storage. J. Ecol. 59:127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kira, T., and H. Ogawa. 1971. Assessment of primary production in tropical and equatorial forests. (French summ.) In Productivity of Forest Ecosystems: Proc. Brussels Symp. 1969, P. Duvigneaud, ed. Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 4: 309–321. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  10. Lieth, H. 1956. Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Korrelation zwischen mittleren Klimawerten und Vegetationsformationen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges. 69:169–176.Google Scholar
  11. —, and F. Zauner. 1957. Vegetationsformationen und mittlere Klimadaten. Flora 144:290–296.Google Scholar
  12. —. 1961. La producción de sustancia organica por la capa vegetal terrestre y sus problemas. Acta Cient. Venez. 12:107–114.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1962. Die Stoffproduktion der Pflanzendecke. 156 pp. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
  14. —. 1963. The role of vegetation in the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere.J. Geophys. Res. 68:3887–3898.Google Scholar
  15. —. 1964. Versuch einer kartographischen Darstellung der Produktivität der Pflanzendecke auf der Erde. In Geographisches Taschenbuch 1964/65, pp. 72–80. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
  16. —, D. Osswald, and H. Martens. 1965. Stoffproduktion, Spross/Wurzel-Verhlätnis, Chlorophyllgehalt und Blattfläche von Jungpappeln. Mitt. Ver. Forstl. Standortsk. Forstpflanz. 1965:70–74.Google Scholar
  17. —. 1965a. Ökologische Fragestellungen bei der Untersuchung der biologischen Stoffproduktion. Qual Plant. Mater. Veg. 12:241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. —. 1965b. Indirect methods of measurement of dry matter production. Methodology of Plant Ecophysiology: Proc. Montpellier Symp., F. E. Eckardt, ed. Arid Zone Research, Vol. 25:513–518. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  19. —. 1968. The determination of plant dry matter production with special emphasis on the underground parts. (French summ.) In Functioning of Terrestrial Ecosystems at the Primary Production Level: Proc. Copenhagen Symp. 1965, F. E. Eckardt, ed. Natural Resources Res., Vol. 5:179–186. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  20. —. 1970. Predicted annual fixation of carbon for the land-masses and oceans of the world. [Map on front end paper.] In Analysis of Temperate Forest Ecosystems, D. Reichle, ed. Ecological Studies, Vol. 1. Heidelberg: Springer- Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. —. 1971. Mathematical modeling for ecosystems analyses. (French summ.) In Productivity of Forest Ecosystems: Proc. Brüssels Symp. 1969, P. Duvigneaud, ed. Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 4:567–575. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  22. —. 1972a. Über die Primärproduktion der Pflanzendecke der Erde. (Symp. German Botanical Soc., Innsbruck, Austria, Sept., 1971.) Z. Angew. Bot. 46: 1–37.Google Scholar
  23. —. 1972b. Modeling the primary productivity of the world, 10 pp. (offset) Deciduous Forest Biome Memo Rep. 72–9, March 1972.Google Scholar
  24. —. 1973. Primary production: Terrestrial ecosystems. Human Ecol 1:303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. —, ed. 1974a Phenology and Seasonality Modeling. Ecological Studies, Vol. 8, 444 pp. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. —, 1974b. Primary productivity of successional stages. In Vegetation Dynamics, R. Knapp, ed.Handbook of Vegetation Science, Vol. 8:187–193. The Hague: W. Junk.Google Scholar
  27. —. 1975. The primary productivity in ecosystems. Comparative analysis of global patterns. In Unifying Concepts in Ecology, W. H. Dobben and R. H. Lowe-McConnel, eds. The Hague: W. Junk. (In press.)Google Scholar
  28. —, and E. Box. 1972. Evapotranspiration and primary productivity; C. W. Thornthwaite Memorial Model. Publications in Climatology, Vol. 25(2): 37–46. Centerton/Elmer, New Jersey: C. W. Thornthwaite Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Medina, E. 1970. Estudios eco-fisiologicos de la vegetation tropical. Bol. Soc. Venez. Cine. Nat. 29:63–88.Google Scholar
  30. Mitscherlich, E. A. 1954. Bodenkunde für Landwirte. In Forstwirte und Gärtner, 7th ed. Berlin and Hamburg: Parey.Google Scholar
  31. Nemeth, J. 1971. Doctoral thesis, Raleigh, North Carolina: North Carolina State Univ.Google Scholar
  32. Reader, R. 1971. Net primary productivity and peat accumulation in Southeastern Manitoba, 220 pp. Master’s thesis. Winnipeg: Univ. of Manitoba.Google Scholar
  33. —. 1973. Leaf Emergence, Leaf Coloration, and Photosynthetic Period-productivity Models for the Eastern Deciduous Forest Biome, 167 pp. and appendix. Doctoral thesis. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Univ. of North Carolina, Ecology Curriculum.Google Scholar
  34. —, and UNC Applied Programming Group. 1972. SYMAP (Version 5.16A) Instruction Manual, 65 pp. Document No. LSR-139–0. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: Triangle Universities Computation Center.Google Scholar
  35. —, J. S. Radford, and H. Lieth. 1974. Modeling important phytophenological events in Eastern North America. In Phenology and Seasonality Modeling, H. Lieth, ed. Ecological Studies, Vol. 8:329–348. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Walter, H. 1939. Grasland, Savanne und Busch der ariden Teile Afrikas in ihrer ökologischen Bedingtheit. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 87:850–860.Google Scholar
  37. —. 1964. Die Vegetation der Erde in Öko-physiologischer Betrachtung. Vol. 1: Die tropischen und subtropischen Zonen, 538 pp. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
  38. —. 1968. Die Vegetation der Erde in öko-physiologischer Betrachtung, Vol. 2: Die gemässigten und arktischen Zonen, 1001 pp. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
  39. —, and H. Lieth. 1960–1967.Climate Diagram World Atlas. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
  40. Wells, C., and H. Lieth. 1970. Preliminary assessment of the productivity of a Pinus taeda plantation in the Piedmont of North Carolina, 41 pp. (mimeogr.) Report to the Deciduous Forest Biome Headquarters.Google Scholar
  41. Whittaker, R. H. 1966. Forest dimensions and production in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 47:103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. —, and G. M. Woodwell. 1971. Measurement of net primary production of forests. (French summ.) In Productivity of Forest Ecosystems: Proc. Brussels Symp. 1969, P. Duvigneaud, ed. Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 4:159–174. Paris: UNESCOGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut Lieth

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations