Skip to main content
Book cover

Fragrances pp 153–158Cite as

A Reappraisal of the Guinea Pig Maximization Test

  • Conference paper
  • 298 Accesses

Abstract

The human maximization test was described 30 years ago, in 1966, followed 3 years later by the guinea pig maximization test [1,2]. Owing to limited access to human volunteers, it is the guinea pig test which has been far more frequently used. Although alternative animal models are receiving appreciable attention, the guinea pig maximization test is still the gold standard for assessing allergenicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kligman AM (1966) The identification of contact allergens by human assay. J Invest Derm 47:369

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Magnusson B, Kligman AM (1969) The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. J Invest Derm 52:268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kligman AM, Basketter DA (1995) A critical commentary and updating of the guinea pig maximization test. Contact Dermatitis 32:129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schlede VE, Eppler R (1993) Prüfung auf Hautsensibilisierung nach den Kriterien des Chemikaliengesetzes am Beispiel des Magnusson-Kligman-Tests. Bundesgesundheitsamt 12:519

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buehler EU (1996) Non-specific hypersensitivity: false positive responses with the use of Freund’s adjuvant. Contact Dermatitis 34:111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Andersen KE, Frankild S, Wahlberg JE, Boman A (1996) Nonspecific hyper-reactivity related to the use of Freund’s Adjuvant. Contact Dermatitis 35:2:127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchell J (1975) The angry back syndrome: eczema creates eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1:193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maibach HE (1981) The excited skin syndrome. In: Ring J, Burg G (eds) New trends in allergy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 208–221

    Google Scholar 

  9. von Zumbusch L (1921) Über die Behandlung des Ekzems. Munchner Med Wochenschr 68:408

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bloch B (1924) Pathogenesis des Ekzems. Archiv Dermatol Syphol 145:34

    Google Scholar 

  11. Geiger R (1929) Unspezifische Desensibilisierungs-Versuche an Ekzematikern mit Tarpentinol auf perkutanem Wege. Archiv Dermatol Syphol 158:76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bjornberg A (1968) Skin reactions to primary irritants in patients with hand eczema. Thesis, University of Goteberg Doctoral. Oscar Isacion

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kligman AM, Gollhausen R (1986) The “angry back”: a new concept or old confusion. Br J Derm 115[Suppl 31]:93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruynzeel DP, van Ketel WG, von Blomberg BME, van der Flees, Schepes RD (1983) Angry back or the excited skin syndrome. J Am Acad Derm 8:392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. von Luderschmidt C, Heilgemier R, Ring J, Burg G (1982) Polyvalente Kontaktallergie versus “angry back”. Allergologie 5:262

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pasche-koo F, Hauser C (1992) How to better understand the angry back syndrome. Dermatology 184:237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Andersen KE, Bruee M, Karlberg DT, Wahlberg JE, Voland A (1994) How to do sensitization tests in guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis 81:278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell JC (1996) Egregious blunder of maximization by the angry back and a note on unconfirmed ergodata. Contact Dermatitis 35:131–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kligman, A.M. (1998). A Reappraisal of the Guinea Pig Maximization Test. In: Frosch, P.J., Johansen, J.D., White, I.R. (eds) Fragrances. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80340-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80340-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-80342-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80340-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics