Skip to main content

Part of the book series: ESO Monographs ((ESO MONOGRAPHS))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to outline the specific issues encountered in designing and analysing data from clinical trials on the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of therapies in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This is necessary not only to obtain optimal control of systematic errors, but also to describe their influence on the statistical analysis of the responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tonato M, Roila F, Del Favero A: Methodology of antiemetic trials: a review. Ann Oncol 1991 (2): 107–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Del Favero A, Roila F, Basurto C et al: Assessment of nausea. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1991 (38):115–120

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chevallier B, on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group: The control of acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A comparative study of granisetron and a combination regimen of high-dose metoclopramide and dexamethasone. Br J Cancer 1993 (68):176–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Soukop M on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group: A dose-finding study of granisetron, a novel antiemetic, in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Support Care Cancer 1994 (2): 177–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roila F, Tonato M, Cognetti F et al: Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis: a double-blind multicenter randomized crossover study comparing ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone. J Clin Oncol 1991 (9):675–678

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smyth F, Coleran RE, Nicholson M et al: Does dexamethasone enhance control of acute cispaltin induced emesis by ondansetron? Br Med J 1991 (303):1423–1426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hesketh P, Harvey WH, Harker WG et al: A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis. J Clin Oncol 1994 (12):596–600

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research: Dexamethasone, granisetron, or both for the prevention of nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy for cancer. N Engl J Med 1995 (322): 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roila F, Tonato M, Basurto C et al: Antiemetic activity of high doses of metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone vs metoclopramide alone in cisplatin-treated cancer patients: a randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. J Clin Oncol 1987 (5):141–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pater J, Slamet L, Zee B, Osoba D, Warr D, Rusthoven J: Inconsistency of prognostic factors for both chemotherapy-nausea and vomiting. Support Care Cancer 1994 (2):161–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roila F, Tonato M, Basurto C et al: Antiemetic activity of two different high doses of metoclopramide in cisplatin-treated cancer patients: a randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. Cancer Treat Rep 1985 (69): 1353–1357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roila F, Tonato M, Basurto C et al: Protection from nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients: high-dose metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine: a study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. J Clin Oncol 1989 (7):1693–1700

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research: Difference in persistence of two antiemetic regimens on acute emesis during cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1993(11):2396–2404

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roila F, Tonato M, Del Favero A: Publication of unethical studies on the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis (letter to Editor). J Clin Oncol 1991 (9):891–892

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruff P, Paska W, Goedhals L et al on behalf of the Ondansetron and Granisetron Emesis Study Group: Ondansetron compared with granisetron in the prophylaxis of cisplatin induced acute emesis: a multicenter double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Oncology 1994 (51):113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sorbe BG, Hogberg T, Glimelius B et al: A randomized, multicenter study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron, a new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, with a metoclopramide-containing antiemetic cocktail in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer 1994 (73):445–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Prescott RJ: The comparison of success rates in cross-over trials in the presence of an order effect. Appl Statistics 1981 (30):9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ballatori E: Modelli logistici nell’analisi di dati binari con misure ripetute. Proceedings of the ‘II Congresso Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di Sta-tistica Medica e Programmazione Socio Sanitaria’, Pavia, 26–28 Oct 1989:271–278

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kenward MG and Jones B: A log-linear model for binary cross-over data. Appl Statistics 1987 (36): 192–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research: On the relationship between nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 1994(2):171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research: Cisplatin-induced delayed emesis: pattern and prognostic factors during three subsequent cycles. Ann Oncol 1994(5):585–589

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ballatori, E., Roila, F., Favero, A.D. (1996). Methodology of Antiemetic Trials. In: Tonato, M. (eds) Antiemetics in the Supportive Care of Cancer Patients. ESO Monographs. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80240-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80240-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-80242-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80240-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics