Advertisement

Literatur

  • Achim Schneider
  • Viola Schneider
  • Günther Schlunck

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

Empfohlene Nachschlagewerke

  1. Käser O, Friedberg V, Ober KG, ThoMsen K, Zander J (Hrsg). Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Bd. IL, 2. Auflage, ThieMe, Stuttgart, 1981Google Scholar
  2. Knörr K, Knörr-Gärtner H, Beller FK, Lauritzen C. Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie. 3. Auflage. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1989Google Scholar
  3. Niswander KR (ed.). Manual of Obstet1rics. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, Toronto, 1987Google Scholar
  4. Pschyrembel W, Dudenhausen JW. Praktische Geburtshilfe und geburtshilfliche Operationen. 16. Aufl., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Scott JR, DiSaia PJ, Hammond CB, Spellacy WN (eds). Danforth’ Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6th ed., Lippincott, London, 1990 ÄusserewendungGoogle Scholar

Äussere wendung

  1. Brocks V, Philipsen T, Secher NJ. A randomized trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:653–56, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dyson DC, Ferguson JE 2d, Hensleigh P. Antepartum external cephalic version under tocolysis. Obstet Gynecol 67:63–68, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Egge T, Schauberger C, Schaper A. Dysfunctional labor after external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol 83:771–773, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. External cephalic version [editorial]. Lancet 2:385, 1984Google Scholar
  5. Fortunato SJ, Mercer LJ, Guzick DS. External cephalic version with tocolysis: Factors associated with success. Obstet Gynecol 72:59–62, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hofmayr GJ, Sonnendecker EW. Cardiotocographic changes after external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90:914–18, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ranney B. The gentle art of external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol n6:239–51, 1973 Amniocentese Und ChorionzottenbiopsieGoogle Scholar

Amniocentese Und Chorionzottenbiopsie

  1. Boehm FH, Salyer SL, Dev VG, Reed GW. Chorionic villus sampling: quality control—a continuous improvement model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:1766–1775, 1993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brambati B, Lanzani A, Tului L. Transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling: Efficiency and risk evaluation of 2,411 cases. Am J Med Genet 35:160–64, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callen DF, Korban G, Dawson G, Gugasyan L, Krumins EJ, Eichenbaum S, Petrass J, Purvis-Smith S, Smith A, den Dulk G, Martin N. Extra embryonic/fetal karyotypic discordance during diagnostic chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn 8:453–60,1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuckle HS, Wald NJ, Thompson SG. Estimating a woman’s risk of having a pregnancy associated with Down’s syndrome using her age and serum alpha-fetoprotein level. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:387–402, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans MI, Drugan A, Koppitch FC, Zador IE, Sacks AJ, Sokol RJ. Genetic diagnosis in the first trimester: The norm for the 1990s. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:1332–39, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Furhmann W. Impact, logistics and prospects of traditional prenatal diagnosis. Clin Genet 36:378–85, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldberg JD, Porter AE, Golbus MS. Current assessment of fetal losses as a direct consequence of chorionic villus sampling. Am J Med Genet 35:174–77, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hunter A. False-positive and false-negative findings on chorionic villus sampling [letter]. Prenat Diagn 8:475, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ledbetter DH, Martin AO, Verlinsky Y, Pergament E, Jackson L, et al. Cytogenetic results of chorionic villus sampling: High success rate and diagnostic accuracy in the United States collaborative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:495–501, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Leschot NJ, Wolf H, Weening GH. False negative findings at third trimester chorionic villus sampling (C.V.S.). Clin Genet 34:204–05, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Multicentre randomised clinical trial of chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis. First report. Canadian Collaborative CVS-Amniocentesis Clinical Trial Group. Lancet 1:1–6, 1989Google Scholar
  12. Murken JD (Hrsg). Pränatale Diagnostik und Therapie. Erike, Stuttgart, 1987Google Scholar
  13. Nisani R, Chemke J, Voss R, Appelman Z, Caspi B, Lewin A, Dar H, Reiter A. The dilemma of chromosomal mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling -‘direct’ versus long-term cultures. Prenat Diagn 9:223–26, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rhoads GG, Jackson LG, Schlesselman SE, de la Cruz FF, Desnick RJ, et al. The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities. N Engl J Med 320:609–17, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simpson JL, Mills JL, NICHD Diabetes in Early Pregnancy Project. Methodological problems in determining fetal loss rates: Relevance to chorionic villi sampling. In: M. Fraccaro et al (eds). First Trimester Fetal Diagnosis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1985, pp 321–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tabor A. Genetic amniocentesis — indications and risks. Dan Med Bull 35:520–37, 1988 AmnioninfektionssyndromPubMedGoogle Scholar

Amnioninfektionssyndrom

  1. Altshuler G, Hyde S. Clinicopathologic considerations of fusobacteria cho-rioamnionitis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67:513–17, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amon E, Lewis SV, Sibai BM, Villar MA, Arheart KL. Ampicillin prophylaxis in preterm premature rupture of the membranes: A prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:539–43, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Azziz R, Cumming J, Naeye R. Acute myometritis and chorioamnionitis during cesarean section of asymptomatic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:1137–39, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bek KM, Nielsen FR, Qvist I, Rasmussen PE, Tobiassen M. C-reactive protein (CRP) and pregnancy. An early indicator of chorioamnionitis. A review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 35:29–33, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bone RC. Sepsis, the sepsis syndrome, multi-organ failure: a plea for comparable definitions [editorial] [see comments]. Ann Intern Med 114:332–333, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Broekhuizen FF, Gilman M, Hamilton PR. Amniocentesis for gram stain and culture in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 66:316–21, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chorioamnionitis: Cause or effect? [editorial]. Lancet 1:362, 1989Google Scholar
  8. Dinsmoor MJ, Gibbs RS. Previous intra-amniotic infection as a risk factor for subsequent peripartal uterine infections. Obstet Gynecol 74:299–301, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Easterling TR, Garite TJ. Fusobacterium: Anaerobic occult amnionitis and premature labor. Obstet Gynecol 66:825–28, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Feinstein SJ, Vintzileos AM, Lodeiro JG, Campbell WA, Weinbaum PJ, No-chimson DJ. Amniocentesis with premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 68:147–52, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferguson MG, Rhodes PG, Morrison JC, Puckett CM. Clinical amniotic fluid infection and its effect on the neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:1058–61, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischbach F. Genitale Infektionen und Schwangerschaftsverlauf. In: A. Bolte, H.W. Eibach (Hrsg). Genitale Infektionen. Steinkopff, Darmstadt 1990, S. 175–78Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs RS, Dinsmoor MJ, Newton ER, Ramamurthy RS. A randomized trial of intrapartum versus immediate postpartum treatment of women with in-tra-amniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol 72:823–28, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilstrap LC, Bawdon RE, Burris J. Antibiotic concentration in maternal blood, cord blood, and placental membranes in chorioamnionitis. Obstet Gynecol 72:124–25, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilstrap LC, Leveno KJ, Cox SM, Burris JS, Mashburn M, Rosenfeld CR. Intrapartum treatment of acute chorioamnionitis: Impact on neonatal sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:579–83, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilstrap LC, Cox SM. Acute chorioamnionitis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 16:373–79, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Graeff H, Fischbach F. Infektionsrisiken bei unzeitigem Blasensprung. Arch Gynecol 238:234–40, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guzick DS, Winn K. The association of chorioamnionitis with preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 65:11–16, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hager WD, Pascuzzi M, Vernon M. Efficacy of oral antibiotics following parenteral antibiotics for serious infections in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 73:326–29, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardt NS, Kostenbauder M, Ogburn M, Behnke M, Resnick M, Cruz A. Influence of chorioamnionitis on long-term prognosis in low birth weight infants. Obstet Gynecol 65:5–10, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC, Hankins GD, Connor KD. Term maternal and neonatal complications of acute chorioamnionitis. Obstet Gynecol 66:59–62, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hillier SL, Martius J, Krohn M, Kiviat N, Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA. A case-control study of chorioamnionic infection and histologic chorioamnionitis in prematurity. N Engl J Med 319:972–78, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ismail MA, Zinaman MJ, Lowensohn RI, Moawad AH. The significance of C-reactive protein levels in women with premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:541–44, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirshon B, Moise KJ, Wasserstrum N. Effect of acetaminophen on fetal acid-base balance in chorioamnionitis. J Reprod Med 34:955–59, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lopez Bernal A, Hansell DJ, Canete Soler R, Keeling JW, Turnbull AC. Prostaglandins, chorioamnionitis and preterm labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:1156–58, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martius J, Eschenbach DA. The role of bacterial vaginosis as a cause of amniotic fluid infection, chorioamnionitis and prematurity — a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 247:1–13, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mercer BM, Ramsey RD, Sibai BM. Prenatal screening for group B Streptococcus. I. Impact of antepartum screening on antenatal prophylaxis and intrapartum care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:837–841, 1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mercer BM, Ramsey RD, Sibai BM. Prenatal screening for group B Streptococcus. II. Impact of antepartum screening and prophylaxis on neonatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:842–846, 1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morales WJ. The effect of chorioamnionitis on the developmental outcome of preterm infants at one year. Obstet Gynecol 70:183–86, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mueller-Heubach E, Rubinstein DN, Schwarz SS. Histologic chorioamnionitis and preterm delivery in different patient populations. Obstet Gynecol 75:622–26, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Newton ER, Prihoda TJ, Gibbs RS. Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for intra-amniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol 73:571–75, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Perkins RP, Zhou SM, Butler C, Skipper BJ. Histologic chorioamnionitis in pregnancies of various gestational ages: Implications in preterm rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 70:856–60, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Potkul RK, Moawad AH, Ponto KL. The association of subclinical infection with preterm labor: The role of C-reactive protein. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:642–45, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Quinn PA, Butany J, Taylor J, Hannah W. Chorioamnionitis: Its association with pregnancy outcome and microbial infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:379–87, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Redline RW, Abramowsky CR. Clinical and pathologic aspects of recurrent placental villitis. Hum Pathol 16:727–31, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Romero R, Emamian M, Quintero R, Wan M, Hobbins JC, Mitchell MD. Amniotic fluid prostaglandin levels and intra-amniotic infections [letter]. Lancet 1:1380, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Romero R, Emamian M, Quintero R, Wan M, Hobbins JC, Mazor M, Edberg S. The value and limitations of the Gram stain examination in the diagnosis of intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:114–19, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Romero R, Quintero R, Oyarzun E, Wu YK, Sabo V, Mazor M, Hobbins JC. Intraamniotic infection and the onset of labor in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:661–66, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rouse DJ, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP, Cutter GR, Mennemeyer ST, Fargason CA. Strategies for the prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal sepsis: a decision analysis. Obstet Gynecol 83:483–494, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmidt-Rhode P, Sturm G, Schulz KD. Labordiagnostik bei Genitalinfektionen in der Schwangerschaft. In: A. Bolte, H.W. Eibach (Hrsg). Genitale Infektionen. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, 1990, S. 179–92Google Scholar
  41. Silver HM, Sperling RS, St. Clair PJ, Gibbs RS. Evidence relating bacterial vaginosis to intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:808–12, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Soper DE, Mayhall CG, Dalton HP. Risk factors for intraamniotic infection: A prospective epidemiologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:562–68, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sperling RS, Ramamurthy RS, Gibbs RS. A comparison of intrapartum versus immediate postpartum treatment of intra-amniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol 70:861–65, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Stovall TG, Ambrose SE, Ling FW, Anderson GD. Short-course antibiotic therapy for the treatment of chorioamnionitis and postpartum endomyometritis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:404–07, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Svensson L, Ingemarsson I, Mardh PA. Chorioamnionitis and the isolation of microorganisms from the placenta. Obstet Gynecol 67:403–09, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Winn HN, Egley CC. Acute Haemophilus influenzae chorioamnionitis associated with intact amniotic membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:458–59, 1987 AmnioskopiePubMedGoogle Scholar

Amnioskopie

  1. Berg D. Kritische Bilanz der Fruchtwasseruntersuchungen in der Schwangerschaft. Gynäkologe 7:4–12, 1974Google Scholar
  2. Hutchinson DL, Gray MJ, Pienti AA, Caldeyro-Barcia HA, Kaplan B, Lind J. The role of the fetus in the water exchange of the amniotic fluid of normal and hydramniotic patients. J Clin Invest 38:971–80, 1959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lucas A, Christofides ND, Adrian TE, Bloom SR, Aynsley-Green A. Fetal distress, meconium and motilin [letter]. Lancet 1:718, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Nöschel H, Stech D, Zenner J. Bedeutung von mekoniumhaltigem Fruchtwasser zu Geburtsbeginn nach normalem Schwangerschaftsverlauf. Zbl Gynäkol 97:590–94, 1975Google Scholar
  5. Saling E. Die Amnioskopie, ein neues Verfahren zur Erkennung von Gefahrenzuständen des Feten bei noch stehender Fruchtblase. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 22:830–45, 1962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Saling E. Amnioskopie — neueres Zahlenmaterial. In: E. Saling, F.-J. Schulte (Hrsg). Perinatale Medizin. Thieme, Stuttgart, 1972, S. 33–34 Atonische NachblutungGoogle Scholar

Atonische Nachblutung

  1. Cruikshank SH. Management of postpartum and pelvic hemorrhage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 29:213–19, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Elbourne D, Prendiville W, Chalmers I. Choice of oxytocic preparation for routine use in the management of the third stage of labour: An overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95:17–30, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Evans S, McShane P. The efficacy of internal iliac artery ligation in obstetric hemorrhage. Surg Gynecol Obstet 160:250–53, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gilbert L, Porter W, Brown VA. Postpartum haemorrhage — a continuing problem. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:67–71, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayashi RH, Castillo MS, Noah ML. Management of severe postpartum hemorrhage with a prostaglandin F20α analogue. Obstet Gynecol 63:806–08, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Herbert WN, Cefalo RC. Management of postpartum hemorrhage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:139–47, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Meinen K, Lange R, Breinl H. Intramyometriale PGF20α-Applikation zur Beherrschung schwerer atonischer Nachblutungen. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 48:268–70, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zanini A, Norchi S, Beretta E, Bottino S. Postpartum haemorrhage — a continuing problem. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95:731–32, 1988 BeckenendlagePubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckenendlage

  1. Benson WL, Boyce DC, Vaughn DL. Breech delivery in the Primigravida. Obstet Gynecol 40:417–28, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg D, Albrecht H, Dudenhausen JW, Hochuli E, Neuhäuser G, Versmold HT, Brand M, Eskes TKAB, Kubli F, Staudach A, Wulf H. Bericht der Standardkommission “Beckenendlage”. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 44:406–08, 1984Google Scholar
  3. Bird CC, McElin TW. 500 Consecutive term breech deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 35:451–57, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird CC, McElin TW. A six-year prospective study of term breech deliveries utilizing the Zatuchni-Andros prognostic scoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 121:551–58, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brady K, Duff P, Read JA, Harlass FE. Reliability of fetal buttock blood sampling in assessing the acid-base balance of the breech fetus. Obstet Gynecol 74:886–88, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Confino E, Gleicher N, Elrad H, Ismajovich B, David MP. The breech dilemma. A review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 40:330–37, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collea JV, Chein C, Quiligan EJ, The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: A study of 208 cases. Am J Ostet Gynecol 137, 235–242, 1980Google Scholar
  8. Flanagan TA, Mulchahey KM, Korenbrot CC, Green JR, Laros RK Jr. Management of term breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:1492–502, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zatuchni GI, Andros GJ. Prognostic index for vaginal delivery in breech presentation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 98:854–57, 1967 CardiotokographiePubMedGoogle Scholar

Cardiotokographie

  1. Anyaegbunam A, Brustman L, Divon M, Langer O. The significance of antepartum variable decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:707–10, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arabin B, Lorenz U, Rüttgers H, Kubli F. Course and predictive value of fetal heart rate parameters. Am J Perinatol 5:272–76, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekedam DJ, Visser GHA, Mulder EJH, Poelmann-Weesjes G. Heart rate variation and movement incidence in growth-retarded fetuses: The significance of antenatal late heart rate decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157:126–33, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Collea JV, Holls WM. The contraction stress test. Clin Obstet Gynecol 25:707–18, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer WM. Kardiotokographie. Thieme, Stuttgart, 1981Google Scholar
  6. Gagnon R, Campbell K, Hunse C, Patrick J. Patterns of human fetal heart rate accelerations from 26 weeks to term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157:743–48, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Goeschen K. Kardiotokographie-Praxis. Thieme, Stutt-gart, 1985Google Scholar
  8. Jenkins HM. Thirty years of electronic intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: Discussion paper. J R Soc Med 82:210–14, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lavery JP. Nonstress fetal heart rate testing. Clin Obstet Gynecol 25:689–706, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nicolaides KH, Sadovsky G, Visser GHA. Heart rate patterns in normoxemic, hypoxemic, and anemic second-trimester fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:1034–37, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nielsen PV, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, Nim J. Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 66:421–24, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paul RH, Miller FC. Antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Clin Obstet Gynecol 21:375–84, 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schneider EP, Hutson JM, Petrie RH. An assessment of the first decade’s experience with antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Am J Perinatol 5:134–41, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thacker SB, Berkelman RL. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of selected antepartum fetal surveillance techniques. Obstet Gynecol Surv 41:121–41, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

CERVIX-SCORE nach BISHOP

  1. Bishop E. Pelvic screening for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 24:266–68, 1964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Crump WJ. Bishop score and labor duration: A new look. South Med J 80:1294–95, 1987Google Scholar
  3. Elliott JP, Flaherty JF. The use of breast stimulation to ripen the cervix in term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:553–56, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Harris BA Jr, Huddleston JF, Sutliff G, Perlis HW. The unfavorable cervix in prolonged pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 62:171–74, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dammrisse

  1. Borgatta L, Piening SL, Cohen WR. Association of episiotomy and delivery position with deep perineal laceration during spontaneous delivery in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:294–97, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gass MS, Dunn C, Stys SJ. Effect of episiotomy on the frequency of vaginal outlet lacerations. J Reprod Med 31:240–44, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Grant A. Repair of episiotomies and perineal tears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:417–19, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hirsch HA. Episiotomie und Dammriß. Thieme, Stuttgart, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. Legino LJ, Woods MP, Rayburn WF, McGoogan LS. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. J Reprod Med 33:423–26, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Thorp JM Jr, Bowes WA. Episiotomy: Can its routine use be defended? Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:1027–30, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wilcox LS, Strobino DM, Baruffi G, Dellinger WS Jr. Episiotomy and its role in the incidence of perineal lacerations in a maternity center and a tertiary hospital obstetric service. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:1047–52, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar

Diabetes Mellitus

  1. ACOG technical bulletin: Diabetes and pregnancy. Number 200 — December 1994 (Replaces No. 92, May 1986). Int J Gynecol Oncol 48:331–339, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumenthal SA, Abdul-Karim RW. Diagnosis, classification, and metabolic management of diabetes in pregnancy: Therapeutic impact of self-monitoring, of blood glucose and of newer methods of insulin delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 42:593–604, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan TA, Unterman TG, Metzger BE. The medical management of diabetes in pregnancy. Clin Perinatol 12:625–50, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dickinson JE, Palmer SM. Gestational diabetes: Pathophysiology and diagnosis. Semin Perinatol 14:2–11, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Freinkel N, Metzger BE, Phelps RL, Simpson JL, Martin AO, Radvany R, Ober C, Dooley SL, Depp RO, Belton A. Gestational diabetes mellitus: A syndrome with phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity. Horm Metab Res 18:427–30, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hollingsworth DR. Alterations of maternal metabolism in normal and diabetic pregnancies: Differences in insulin-dependent, non-insulin-dependent, and gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146:417–29, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Langer O, Rodriguez DA, Xenakis EM, McFarland MB, Berkus MD, Arren-dondo F. Intensified versus conventional management of gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1036–1046, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Reece EA, Hobbins JC. Diabetic embryopathy: pathogenesis, prenatal diagnosis and prevention. Obstet Gynecol Surv 41:325–35, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Weiss PAM, Hofmann H. Diabetes mellitus und Schwangerschaft. In: E. Burkhardt (Hrsg.), Spezielle Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Springer, Heidelberg, 1987, s. 337–427Google Scholar

Doppler-Sonographie

  1. Arabin B, Bergmann PL, Pachaly J, Saling E. Perzentilenkurven qualitativer Doppler-Blutflußparameter uteroplazentarer und fetaler Gefäße. Ultraschall Klin Prax 3:132–40, 1988Google Scholar
  2. Brar HS. The use of Doppler ultrasound to assess intrauterine growth retardation in the fetus. Semin perinatol 12:40–51, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke G, Stuart B, Crowley P, Scanaill SN, Drumm J. Is intrauterine growth retardation with normal umbilical artery blood flow a benign condition? BMJ 300:1044–45, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell S, Hernandez CJ, Cohen-Overbeek TA, Pearce JMF. Assessment of fetoplacental and uteroplacental blood flow using duplex pulsed Doppler ultrasound in complicated pregnancies. J Perinat Med 12:262–65, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eik-Nes SH, Brubakk AO, Ulstein MK. Measurement of human fetal blood flow. Br Med J 5:283–84, 1980Google Scholar
  6. Farmakides G, Schulman H, Schneider E, Mesogitis S, Coury A. Umbilical artery velocimetry in multiple pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 32:687–91, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. FitzGerald DE, Drumm JE. Non-invasive measurement of human fetal circulation using ultrasound: A new method. Br Med J 2:1450–51, 1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fok RY, Pavlova Z, Bernischke K, Paul RH, Platt LD. The correlation of arterial lesions with umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the placentas of small-for-dates pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 75:578–83, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gill RW. Doppler ultrasound — Physical aspects. Semin Perinatol 11:292–99, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanretty KP, Whittle MJ. Doppler uteroplacental waveforms in pregnancy-induced hypertension: A re-appraisal. Lancet 1:850–52, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Indik JH, Chen V, Reed KL. Association of umbilical venous with inferior vena cava blood flow velocities. Obstet Gynecol 77:551–557, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Newnham JP, Patterson LL, James IR, Diepeveen DA, Reid SE. An evaluation of the efficacy of Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis as a screening test in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:403–07, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Reed KL, Appleton CP, Anderson CF, Shenker L, Sahn DJ. Doppler studies of vena cava flows in human fetuses. Insights into normal and abnormal cardiac physiology. Circulation 81:498–505, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Steel SA, Pearce JM, McParland P, Chamberlain GVP. Early doppler ultrasound screening of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Lancet 335:1548–1551, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Trudinger BJ, Cook CM, Giles WB, Connelly A, Thompson RS. Umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms in high-risk pregnancy. Lancet 1:188–90, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Trudinger BJ, Cook CM. Doppler umbilical and uterine flow waveforms in severe pregnancy hypertension. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:142–48, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weiner CP. The relationship between the umbilical artery systolic/diastolic ratio and umbilical blood gas measurements in specimens obtained by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:1198–1202, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wladimiroff JW, Huisman TW, Stewart PA, Stijnen T. Normal fetal Doppler inferior vena cava, transtricuspid, and umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms between 11 and 16 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:921–924, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dystokie

  1. Brenner WE. Abnormal progression of labor (dystocia). Clin Obstet Gynecol 16:243–61, 1973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garfield RE. Cellular and molecular bases for dystocia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 30:3–18, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jacobs JB. Solving the problem of cervical dystocia and prolonged labor [letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:650, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lindgren L. The influence of uterine motility upon cervical dilatation in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 117:530–36, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Seitchik J, Holden AE, Castillo M. Amniotomy and oxytocin treatment of functional dystocia and route of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:585–92, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Seitchik J. The management of functional dystocia in the first stage of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 30:42–49, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Episiotomie

  1. Beynon CL. Midline episiotomy as a routine procedure. J Obstet Gynecol 81:126–30, 1974Google Scholar
  2. Copony L, Werner Ch. Vergleichende Studie über Früh- und Spätergebnisse nach transcutaner und intracutaner Naht der mediolateralen Episiotomie. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 184:223–26, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Glasenapp KH. Mediane contra mediolaterale Episiotomie, ein Vergleich. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 33737–42, 1973Google Scholar
  4. Grant A. Repair of episiotomies and perineal tears [editorial]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:417–19, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC 3d, Ward SC, Hankins GD. Early repair of an external sphincter ani muscle and rectal mucosal dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol 67:806–09, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirsch HA. Episiotomie und Dammriß. Thieme, Stuttgart, 1989Google Scholar
  7. Isager-Sally L, Legarth J, Jacobsen B, Bostofte E. Episiotomy repair — immediate and long-term sequelae. A prospective randomized study of three different methods of repair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:420–25, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sleep J, Grant A, Garcia J, Elbourne D, Spencer J, Chalmers I. West Berkshire perineal management trial. Br Med J 289:587–90, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sleep J, Grant A. West Berkshire perineal management trial: Three year follow up. Br Med J 295:749–51, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Varner MW. Episiotomy: Techniques and indications. Clin Obstet Gynecol 29:309–17, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forceps

  1. Beller FK, Quakernack K. Geburtsunterstützung durch die Bek-kenausgangszange. Med Welt 28:1665–68, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd ME, Usher RH, McLean FH, Norman BE. Failed forceps. Obstet Gynecol 68:779–83, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardozo LD, Gibb DM, Studd JW, Cooper DJ. Should we abandon Kielland’s forceps? Br Med J 287:315–17, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiswick ML, James DK. Kielland’s forceps: Association with neonatal morbidity and mortality. Br Med J 1:7–9, 1979Google Scholar
  5. Chow SL, Johnson CM, Anderson TD, Hughes JH. Rotational delivery with Kielland’s forceps. Med J Aust 146:616–19, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidson AC, Weaver JB, Davies P, Pearson JF. The relation between ease of forceps delivery and speed of cervical dilatation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 83:279–83, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dierker LJ Jr, Rosen MG, Thompson K, Lynn P. Midforceps deliveries: Long-term outcome of infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:764–68, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Drife JO. Kielland or Caesar? [editorial]. Br Med J 287:309–10, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Healy DL, Quinn MA, Pepperell RJ. Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kiel-land’s forceps and two other methods compared. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89:501–06, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hickl EJ. Indikation und Risiko von Zangen- und Vakuumextraktion heute. Gynäkologe 8:13–18, 1975Google Scholar
  11. Johanson R, Pusey J, Livera N, Jones P. North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96:537–44, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laube DW. Forceps delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 29:286–98, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Punnonen R, Aro P, Kuukankorpi A, Pystynen P. Fetal and maternal effects of forceps and vacuum extraction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:1132–35, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sipli W, Krone HA. Ein neues Zangenmodell. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 36:592–95, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith EC. A new obstetric forceps. For rotation and extraction of the fetal head in a single application. Am J Obstet Gynecol 94:931–35, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Traub AI, Morrow RJ, Ritchie JW, Dornan KJ. A continuing use for Kiel-land’s forceps? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:894–98, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frühgeburt

  1. Arias F, Knight AB, Tomich PB. A retrospective study on the effects of steroid administration and prolongation of the latent phase in patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:1059–63, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayers JWT, DeGrood RM, Compton AA, Barclay M, Ansbacher R. Sonographic evaluation of cervical length in pregnancy: Diagnosis and management of preterm cervical effacement in patients at risk for premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol 71:939–44, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowes WA. Clinical management of preterm delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 31:652–61, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eggleston MK. Management of preterm labor and delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 29:230–39, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Escobedo MB. Follow-up of prematurely born infants. Clin Obstet Gynecol 31:662–68, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fangman JJ, Mark PM, Pratt L, Conway KK, Healey ML, Oswald JW, Uden DL. Prematurity prevention programs: an analysis of successes and failures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:744–750, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaudier FL, Goldenberg RL, Nelson KG, Peralta Carcelen M, Johnson SE, Du-Bard MB, Roth TY, Hauth JC. Acid-base status at birth and subsequent neurosensory impairment in surviving 500 to 1000 gm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:48–53, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hack M, Fanaroff AA. The outcome of growth failure associated with preterm birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:647–63, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hobel CJ, Ross MG, Bemis RL, Bragonier JR, Nessim S, Sandhu M, Bear MB, Mori B. The West Los Angeles Preterm Birth Prevention Project. I. Program impact on high-risk women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:54–62, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffman HJ, Bakketeig LS. Risk factors associated with the occurrence of preterm birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:539–52, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. lams JD, Johnson FF, Creasy RK. Prevention of preterm birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 31:599–615, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kristal AR, Rush D. Maternal nutrition and duration of gestation: A review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:553–61, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Low JA, Panagiotopoulos C, Derrick EJ. Newborn complications after intrapartum asphyxia with metabolic acidosis in the preterm fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:805–810, 1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maher JE, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, Copper RL. The effect of corticosteroid therapy in the very premature infant. March of Dimes Multi-center Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:869–873, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA. Delivery room management of the low birth weight infant. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:636–46, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCarton CM, Vaughan HG. Perinatal variables and neurodevelopmental outcomes with preterm births. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:664–71, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mortensen OA, Franklin J, Löfstrand T, Svanberg B. Prediction of preterm birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 66:507–12, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nwaesei CG, Young DC, Byrne JM, Vincer MJ, Sampson D, Evans JR, Allen AC, Stinson DA. Preterm birth at 23 to 26 weeks’ gestation: Is active obstetric management justified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 157:890–97, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Parisi VM. Cervical incompetence and preterm labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 31:585–98, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pohlandt Frank. Frühgeborenen-Überlebensstatistik der Universitäts-Kinderklinik und Poliklinik Ulm; persönliche MitteilungGoogle Scholar
  21. Romero R, Mazor M. Infection and preterm labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 31:553–84, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tejani N, Verma U, Hameed C, Chayen B. Method and route of delivery in the low birth weight vertex presentation correlated with early periventricular/intraventricular hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 69:1–4, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar

Geburtseinleitung

  1. Bernstein P, Leyland N, Gurland P, Gare D. Cervical ripening and labor induction with prostaglandin E2 gel: A placebo-controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:336–40, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bidgood KA, Steer PJ. A randomized control study of oxytocin augmentation of labour. 2. Uterine activity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:518–22, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dowding VM, Duignan NM, Henry GR, MacDonald DW. Induction of labour, birthweight and perinatal mortality by day of the week. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:413–19, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ekman G, Granström L, Ulmsten U. Induction of labor with intravenous oxytocin or vaginal PGE2 suppositories. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 65:857–59, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horenstein JM, Phelan JP. Previous cesarean section: The risks and benefits of oxytocin usage in a trial of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:564–69, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Laube DW, Zlatnik FJ, Pitkin RM. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel. Obstet Gynecol 68:54–57, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Prins RP, Neilson DR Jr, Bolton RN, Mark C, Watson P. Preinduction cervical ripening with sequential use of prostaglandin E2 gel. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:1275–79, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Trofatter KF Jr, Bowers D, Gall SA, Killam AP. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (Prepidil) gel. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:268–71, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Seitchik J, Holden AEC, Castillo M. Amniotomy and the use of oxytocin in labor in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:848–54, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Seitchik J, Holden AEC, Castillo M. Amniotomy and oxytocin treatment of functional dystocia and route of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:585–92, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Silva-Cruz A, Godinho F, Pinto JM, Andrade L, Simoes D. Prostaglandin E2 gel compared to oxytocin for medically-indicated labour induction at term: A controlled clinical trial. Pharmatherapeutica 5:228–32, 1988Google Scholar

Gemini

  1. Gaudhi J, Gugliocci L. Intrapartum management of twin gestation. Bull NY Acad Med 59:358–71, 1983Google Scholar
  1. Ghai V, Vidyasagar D. Morbidity and mortality factors in twins. An epidemiologic approach. Clin Perinatol 15:123–40, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gocke SE, Nageotte MP, Garite T, Towers CV, Dorcester W. Management of the nonvertex second twin: Primary cesarean section, external version, or primary breech extraction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:111–14, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Laros RK Jr, Dattel BJ. Management of twin pregnancy: The vaginal route is still safe. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158:1330–38, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Leveno KJ., Quirk JG, Whalley PJ, Herbert WN, Trubey R. Fetal lung maturation in twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:405–11, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rabinovici J, Barkai G, Reichman B, Serr DM, Mashiach S. Randomized management of the second nonvertex twin: Vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:52–56, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Saunders MC, Dick JS, Brown IM. The effects of hospital admission for bed rest on the duration of twin pregnancy: A randomised trial. Lancet 2:793–95, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Warenski JC, Kochenour NK. Intrapartum management of twin gestation. Clin Perinatol 16:889–97, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar

Gerinnungsstörungen

  1. Feinstein D. Treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis 14:351–62, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fruchtman S, Aledort L. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:159–67, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kwaan HC. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:101–06, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Van Dam P, Renier M, Baekelandt M, Buytaert P, Uyttenbroeck F. Disseminated intravascular coagulation and the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets in severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 73:97–102, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Weenink G, ten Cate J, Treffers P. Hypertensive disorders. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:37–52, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Weiner C. The obstetric patient and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Clin Perinatol 13:705–17, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar

Hellp-Syndrom

  1. Benacerraf B, Frigoletto FD, Martini CA. Sonographic findings in severe preeclampsia twenty-four hours prior to clinical signs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152:684–85, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. McKenna J, Dover NL, Breme RG. Preeclampsia associated with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets — an obstetric emergency? Obstet Gynecol 62:751–54, 1983Google Scholar
  3. Poldre PA. Haptoglobin helps diagnose the HELLP syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157:1267, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sibai BM, Taslimi MM, El-Nazer A, Amon E, Mabie BC, Ryan GM. Maternal-perinatal outcome associated with the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets in severe preeclampsia-eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:501–09, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Van Dam PA, Renier M, Baekelandt M, Buytaert P, Uyttenbroeck F. Disseminated intravascular coagulation and the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets in severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 73:97–102, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Weinstein L. Syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count: A severe consequence of hypertension in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2:159–67, 1982Google Scholar

HIV-Infektion und Schwangerschaft

  1. Weinstein L. Preeclampsia/eclampsia with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and thrombocytopenia. Obstet Gynecol 66:657–60, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Birth outcomes following zidovudine therapy in pregnant women [published erratum appears in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1994 Jun 24;43(24):450]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 43:409, 415–6, 1994Google Scholar
  3. Caesarean section and risk of vertical transmission of HIV-1 infection. The European Collaborative Study [see comments]. Lancet 343:1464–1467, 1994Google Scholar
  4. Blanche S, Mayaux MJ, Rouzioux C, Teglas JP, Firtion G, Monpoux F, Ciraru Vigneron N, Meier F, Tricoire J, Courpotin C, et al. Relation of the course of HIV infection in children to the severity of the disease in their mothers at delivery [see comments]. N Engl J Med 330:308–312, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biedermann K, Rudin C, Irion O, Spoletini G, Lauper U, Kind C. [Pregnancies in HIV infected women in Switzerland]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 55:447–455, 1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goedert JJ, Duliege AM, Amos CI, Felton S, Biggar RJ. High risk of HIV-1 infection for first-born twins. The International Registry of HIV-exposed Twins [see comments]. Lancet 338:1471–1475, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lindsay MK. Human immunodeficiency virus and the obstetrician. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:821–831, 1993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mofenson, L., Balsley, J., Simonds, R.J., Rogers, M.F., and Moseley, R.R. Recommendations of the U.S. public health service task force on the use of zidovudine to reduce perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus. MMWR 43, 1–20, 1994Google Scholar
  9. Rogers MF, Jaffe HW. Reducing the risk of maternal-infant transmission of HIV: a door is opened [editorial; comment]. N Engl J Med 331:1222–1223, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sperling RS, Stratton P. Treatment options for human immunodeficiency virus-infected pregnant women. Obstetric-Gynecologic Working Group of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Obstet Gynecol 79:443–448, 1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Temmerman M, Chomba EN, Ndinya Achola J, Plummer FA, Coppens M, Piot P. Maternal human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 83:495–501, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wagner R, Mayer J, Wolf H. [Current advances in HIV pathogenesis. Results of therapy and vaccine development]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 120:728–736, 1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Intrauteriner Fruchttod

  1. Freeman RK, Dorchester W, Anderson G, Garite TJ. The significance of a previous stillbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:7–13, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hovatta O, Lipasti A, Rapola J, Karjalainen O. Causes of stillbirth: A clinicopathological study of 243 patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90:691–96, 1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kochenour NK. Management of fetal demise. Clin Obstet Gynecol 30:322–30, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mursch G, Kassowitz C, Arzt W, Fröhlich H. Prostaglandine zur Schwangerschaftsbeendigung im 2. und 3. Trimenon. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 12:893–95, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rath W, Kuhn W. Prostaglandine in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Arzneimitteltherapie 6:111–21, 1988Google Scholar

Manuelle Placentalösung

  1. Gibbs RS, Weinstein AJ. Puerperal infection in the antibiotic era. Am J Obstet Gynecol 124:769–87, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Reddy VV, Carey JC. Effect of umbilical vein oxytocin on puerperal blood loss and length of the third stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:206–08, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar

Mekoniumaspirationssyndrom

  1. Abramovici H, Brandes JM, Fuchs K, Timor-Tritsch I. Meconium during delivery: A sign of compensated fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 118:251–55, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacsik R. Meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatr Clin North Am 24:463–79, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gregory GA, Gooding CA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH. Meconium aspiration in infants — a prospective study. J Pediatr 85:848–52, 1974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Miller FC, Sacks DA, Yeh SY, Paul RH, Schifrin BS, Martin CB, Hon EH. Significance of meconium during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122:573–80, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nathan L, Leveno KJ, Carmody TJ, 3rd, Kelly MA, Sherman ML. Meconium: a 1990s perspective on an old obstetric hazard. Obstet Gynecol 83:329–332, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ting P, Brady JP. Tracheal suction in meconium aspiration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122:767–71, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar

Mikroblutuntersuchung (MBU)

  1. Goeschen K, Gruner T, Saling E. Stellenwert des Hammacher-Scores und der Fetalblutanalyse bei der subpartalen Überwachung des Kindes. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 188:12–20, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Saling E, Schneider D. Biochemical supervision of the foetus during labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 74:799–811, 1967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Saling E. Introduction and clinical aspects of biochemical monitoring of the fetus. J Perinat Med Suppl 1:23–47, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nabelschnurvorfall

  1. Anderson GV Jr, Anderson GV Sr. Umbilical cord prolapse in the emergency department (editorial). J Emerg Med 7:207, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Critchlow CW, Leet TL, Benedetti TJ, Daling JR. Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case-control study among births in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:613–618, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Driscoll JA, Sadan O, Van Gelderen CJ, Holloway GA. Cord prolapse — can we save more babies? Case reports. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:594–95, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fribourg S. Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 65:772, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson RL, Anderson JC, Irsik RD, Goodlin RC. Duplex ultrasound diagnosis of umbilical cord prolapse. JCU 15:282–84, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Katz Z, Shoham Z, Lancet M, Blickstein I, Mogilner BM, Zalel Y. Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse: A 5-year study. Obstet Gynecol 72:278–81, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Levy H, Meier PR, Makowski EL. Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 64:499–502, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Woo JSK, Ngan YS, Ho-Kei Ma. Prolapse and presentation of the umbilical cord. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaec 23:142–45, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ylä-Outinen A, Heinonen PK, Tuimala R. Predisposing and risk factors of umbilical cord prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 64:567–70, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nachtastung und Nachcurettage

  1. Epperly TD, Fogarty JP, Hodges SG. Efficacy of routine postpartum uterine exploration and manual sponge curettage. J Fam Pract 28:172–76, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Packin GS. A study of routine postpartum manual sponge curettage. J Am Osteopath 74:839–43, 1975Google Scholar

Partogramm

  1. Cardozo LD, Gibb DM, Studd JW, Vasant RV, Cooper DJ. Predictive value of cervimetric labour patterns in Primigravidae. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89:33–38, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Drouin P, Nasah BT, Nkounawa F. The value of the Partogramme in the mangement of labor. Obstet Gynecol 53:741–45, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Duncan GR, Costello E. The partogram: A graphic guide to progress in labour. N Z Med J 82:193–95, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Earn AA. The partographic labor board: An alternative for earlier decisions regarding management during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144:858–59, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Friedman EA. The labor curve. Clin Perinatol 8:15–25, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Philpott RH. The recognition of cephalopelvic disproportion. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 9:609–24, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Studd JW, Philpott RH. Partograms and action line of cervical dilatation. Proc R Soc Med 65:700–01, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Studd J. Partograms and nomograms of cervical dilatation in management of primigravid labour. Br Med J 4:451–55, 1973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelvimetrie

  1. Alder C, Aebi S, Bernhard M. Der Stellenwert der radiologischen Bekkenmessung. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 47:483–86, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Compton AA. Soft tissue and pelvic dystocia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 30:69–76, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deutinger J, Bernaschek G. Vaginosonographical determination of the true conjugate and the transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet. Arch Gynecol 240:241–46, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fine EA, Bracken M, Berkowitz RL. An evaluation of the usefulness of X-ray pelvimetry: Comparison of the Thorns and modified Ball methods with manual pelvimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137:15–20, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Frame S, Moore J, Peters A, Hall D. Maternal height and shoe size as predictors of pelvic disproportion: An assessment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92:1239–45, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hughes AB, Jenkins DA, Newcombe RG, Pearson JF. Symphysis-fundus height, maternal height, labor pattern, and mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:644–48, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. MacMahon B. Prenatal X-ray exposure and childhood cancer. JNCI 28:1173–91, 1962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mandry J, Grandjean H, Reme JM, Pastor J, Levade C, Pontonnier G. Assessment of the predictive value of X-ray pelvimetry and biparietal diameter in cephalopelvic disproportion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 15:173–79, 1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morgan MA, Thurnau GR, Fishburne JI. The fetal-pelvic index as an indicator of fetal-pelvic disproportion: A preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:608–13, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Morgan MA, Thurnau GR. Efficacy of the fetal-pelvic index in patients requiring labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:621–25, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Muncie HL. Relationship of shoe size and cephalopelvic disproportion [letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:931–32, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yamazaki H, Uchida K. A mathematical approach to problems of cephalopelvic disproportion at the pelvic inlet. Am J Obstet Gynecol 147:25–37, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar

Pharmaka

  1. Baxi LV, Petrie RH. Pharmacologic effects on labor: Effects of drugs on dystocia, labor, and uterine activity. Clin Obstet Gynecol 30:19–32, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gilman A, Goodman LS, Rall TW, Murad F. Goodman and Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. Macmillan Pergamon Publishing Corp., New York, Toronto, London, 1990Google Scholar
  3. Goeschen K. Behandlung mit Prostaglandinen in Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie. Enke Verlag Stuttgart, 1989Google Scholar
  4. Kleinebrecht J, Fränz J, Windorfer A. Arzneimittel in der Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, 1990Google Scholar
  5. Spielmann H, Steinhoff R. Taschenbuch der Arzneimittelverordnung in Schwangerschaft und Stillperiode. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, 1990Google Scholar

Placenta praevia

  1. Chervenak FA, Lee Y, Hendler MA, Monoson RF, Berkowitz RL. Role of attempted vaginal delivery in the management of placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 64:798–801, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Farine D, Fox HE, Jakobson S, Timor-Tritsch IE. Vaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:566–69, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. McShane PM, Heyl PS, Epstein MF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity resulting from placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 65:176–82, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sampson MB, Lastres O, Tomasi AM, Thomason JL, Work BA. Tocolysis with terbutaline sulfate in patients with placenta previa complicated by premature labor. J Reprod Med 29:248–50, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sauer M, Parsons M, Sampson M. Placenta previa: An analysis of three years experience. Am J Perinatol 2:39–42, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Präeklampsie

  1. Belizan JM, Villar J, Gonzalez L, Campodonico L, Bergel E. Calcium supplementation to prevent hypertensive disorders of pregnancy [see comments]. N Engl J Med 325:1399–1405, 1991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. CLASP: a randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant women. CLASP (Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy) Collaborative Group [see comments]. Lancet 343:619–629, 1994Google Scholar
  3. Chesley LC. History and epidemiology of preeclampsia-eclampsia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:801–20, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chesley LC. Diagnosis of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 65:423–25, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. DeVoe SJ, O’Shaughnessy R. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:836–53, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, Parker CR, Jr., Cutter GR, Cliver SP. Low-dose aspirin: lack of association with an increase in abruptio placentae or perinatal mortality. Obstet Gynecol 85:1055–1058, 1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Redman CW, Jefferies M. Revised definition of pre-eclampsia. Lancet 1:809–12, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schiff E, Friedman SA, Sibai BM. Conservative management of severe preeclampsia remote from term. Obstet Gynecol 84:626–630, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sibai BM, Mabie BC, Harvey CJ, Gonzalez AR. Pulmonary edema in severe preeclampsia-eclampsia: Analysis of thirty-seven consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:1174–79, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Stone JL, Lockwood CJ, Berkowitz GS, Alvarez M, Lapinski R, Berkowitz RL. Risk factors for severe preeclampsia [see comments]. Obstet Gynecol 83:357–361, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Worley RJ. Pathophysiology of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:821–35, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zuspan FP. Hypertension and renal disease in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:797–800, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zuspan FP. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:854–73, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reanimation Des Neugeborenen

  1. Behnke M, Carter RL, Hardt NS, Eyler FD, Cruz AC, Resnick MB. The relationship of Apgar Scores, gestational age, and birthweight to survival of low-birthweight infants. Am J Perinatol 4:121–24, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Glass L, Silverman WA, Sinclair JC. Effect of the thermal environment on cold resistance and growth of small infants after the first week of life. Pediatrics 41:1033–46, 1968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Goldenberg RL, Huddieston JF, Nelson KG. Apgar scores and umbilical arterial pH in preterm newborn infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 49:651–54, 1984Google Scholar
  4. Hörnchen H, Wicher W. Reanimation von Früh- und Neugeborenen. Beitr Intens Notfallmed 6:71–81, 1987Google Scholar
  5. Hodson WA, Truog WE. Critical care of the newborn. 2nd ed., WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1988Google Scholar
  6. Lindemann R. Resuscitation of the newborn with endotracheal administration of epinephrine. Acta Paediatr Scand 73:210, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Meuret GH, Abel M. Pringsheim W, Wiemers K. Therapieempfehlungen in der Reanimation von Kindern. Klin Pädiatr 196:21–27, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Obladen M (Hrsg). Neugeborenenintensivpflege. Grundlagen und Richtlinien. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1989Google Scholar
  9. Palme C, Nystrom B, Tunnell R. An evaluation of face masks in the resuscitation of newborn infants. Lancet 1:207–10, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Richmond S, Niswander K, Snodgrass CA, Wagstaff I. The obstetric management of fetal distress and its association with cerebral palsy. Obstet Gynecol 83:643–646, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rogers MC. New developments in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pediatrics 71:655–58, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Scheller JM, Nelson KB. Does cesarean delivery prevent cerebral palsy or other neurologic problems of childhood? [see comments]. Obstet Gynecol 83:624–630, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Socol ML, Garcia PM, Riter S. Depressed Apgar scores, acid-base status, and neurologic outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:991–998, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar

Rhesus-Inkompatibilität

  1. Berkowitz RL, Chitkara U, Wilkins I, Lynch L, Mehalek K. Technical aspects of intravascular intrauterine transfusions. Lessons learned from thirty-three procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157:4–9, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Holzgreve W. Pränatale Medizin, Springer, Berlin, S. 150–66, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. Lemery D, Urbain MF, Van Lieferinghen P, Micorek JC, Jacquetin B. Intrauterine exchange transfusion under ultrasound guidance. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 33:161–68, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Nikolaides KH, Rodeck CH, Mibashan RS, Kemp JR. Have Liley charts outlived their usefulness? Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:90–94, 1987Google Scholar
  5. Rodeck CH, Kemp JR, Holman CA, Whitmore DN, Karnicki J, Austin MA. Direct intravascular fetal blood transfusion by fetoscopy in severe Rhesus isoimmunisation. Lancet 1:625–27, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rodeck CH, Nikolaides KH, Warasof SL, Fysh WJ, Gamsu HR, Kemp JR. The management of severe rhesus isoimmunisation by fetoscopic intravascular transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150:769–74, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Scott JR, Kochenour NK, Larkin RM, Scott MJ. Changes in the management of severely Rh-immunized patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 149:336–41, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar

Schulterdystokie

  1. Acker DB, Sachs BP, Friedman EA. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 66:762–68, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellmann OM, Niesen M. Die Schulterdystokie. Gynäkologe 7:95–101, 1974.Google Scholar
  3. Hibbard LT. Shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 34:424–29, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rubin A. Management of shoulder dystocia. JAMA 189:835–37, 1964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sandberg EC. The Zavanelli maneuver: A potentially revolutionary method for the solution of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152:479–84, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Schwartz BC, Dixon DM. Shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 11:468–71, 1958.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shute WB. Management of shoulder dystocia with the Shute parallel forceps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 84:936–39, 1962Google Scholar

Sectio, Primäre

  1. Danforth DN. Cesarean section. JAMA 253:811–18, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goyert GL, Bottoms SF, Treadwell MC, Nehra PC. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates. N Engl J Med 320:706–09, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Petitti DB. Maternal mortality and morbidity in cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:763–69, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Westgren M, Paul RH. Delivery of the low birth weight infant by cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:752–62, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Witter FR, Repke JT, Niebyl JR. The effect of maternal age on primary cesarean section rate. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 27:51–55, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sectio, Sekundäre

  1. Chestnut DH, Eden RD, Gall SA, Parker RT. Peripartum hysterectomy: A review of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 65:365–70, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Choate JW, Lund CJ. Emergency cesarean section: An analysis of maternal and fetal results in 177 operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 100:703–15, 1968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen WR, Schifrin BS, Doctor G. Elevation of the fetal presenting part: A method of intrauterine resuscitation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 123:646–49, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Flamm BL. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Controversies old and new. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:735–44, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibbs RS. Infection after cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:697–710, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodlin RC. An incision technique for emergency cesarean section. Surg Gynecol Obstet 165:544–46, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Haynes DM, Martin BJ Jr. Cesarean hysterectomy: A twenty-five-year review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 134:392–98, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Iams JD, Reiss R. When should labor be interrupted by cesarean delivery? Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:745–51, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Muth H. Zur Schnellsectio im Kreißbett. Zbl Gynäkol 93:873–76, 1971Google Scholar
  10. Nageotte MP. Cesarean section for fetal distress. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:770–81, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nielsen TF, Hoekegard KH. Postoperative cesarean section morbidity: A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146:911–16, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Philipson EH, Rosen MG. Trends in the frequency of cesarean births. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:691–96, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sturdee DW, Rushton DI. Caesarean and post-partum hysterectomy 1968–1983. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:270–74, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wallace RL, Yonekura ML. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing emergency primary cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 147:533–36, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar

Symphysiotomie

  1. Menticoglou SM. Symphysiotomy for the trapped aftercoming parts of the breech: A review of the literature and a plea for its use. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 30:1–9, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. van Roosmalen J. Symphysiotomy as an alternative to cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 25:451–58, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thrombopenien

  1. Dan U, Barkai G, David B, Goldenberg M, Kukkia E, Mashiach S. Management of labor in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Gynecol Obstet Invest 27:193–96, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Göltner E. Thrombozytäre hämorrhagische Diathesen. In: O Käser, V Friedberg, KG Ober, K Thomsen, J Zander (Hrsg). Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Schwangerschaft und Geburt, Bd. II., Thieme, Stuttgart 1981, S.8.63–8.66Google Scholar
  3. Knitza R, Wisser J, Mempel M, Hiller E. Idiopathische thrombozytopenische Purpura und Schwangerschaft. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 45:797–802, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kwaan HC. Thrombotic trombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic Syndrome in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:101–06, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rote NS, Lau J. Immunologic thrombocytopenic purpura. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:84–100, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Übertragung

  1. A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:716–723, 1994Google Scholar
  2. Boyd ME, Usher RH, McLean FH, Kramer MS. Obstetric consequences of postmaturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158:334–38, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chervenak JL, Divon MY, Hirsch J, Girz BA, Langer O. Macrosomia in the postdate pregnancy: Is routine ultrasonographic screening indicated? Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:753–56, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cucco C, Osborne MA, Cibils LA. Maternal-fetal outcomes in prolonged pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:916–20, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lagrew DC, Freeman RK. Management of postdate pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:8–13, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Leveno KJ, Quirk JG Jr, Cunningham FG, Nelson SD, Santos-Ramos R, Toofanian A, DePalma RT. Prolonged pregnancy. I. Observations concerning the causes of fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150:465–73, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Phelan JP. The postdate pregnancy: An overview. Clin Obstet Gynecol 32:221–27, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rath W, Kuhn W. Prostaglandine in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Arzneimitteltherapie 6:111–21, 1988Google Scholar
  9. Resnik R. Postterm gestation. A symposium. J Reprod Med 33:249–51, 1988Google Scholar
  10. Shime J, Gare DJ, Andrews J, Bertrand M, Salgado J, Whillans G. Prolonged pregnancy: Surveillance of the fetus and the neonate and the course of labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:547–52, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar

Ultraschall

  1. Ewigman B, LeFevre M, Hesser J. A randomized trial of routine prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 76:189–94, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hansmann M, Hackelöer BJ, Staudach A (Hrsg). Ultraschalldiagnostik in Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie. Lehrbuch und Atlas. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, 1985Google Scholar
  3. Romero R, Pilu G, Jeanty P, Ghidini A, Hobbins J (eds). Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Appleton & Lange (Prentice Hall), Norwalk, Connecticut, 1988Google Scholar

Schulterdystokie

  1. Chestnut DH. Uterine rupture and epidural anesthesia [letter]. Obstet Gynecol 66:295–96, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Elder MG. Uterine rupture with the use of vaginal prostaglandin E2 [letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:342, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nielsen TF, Ljungblad U, Hagberg H. Rupture and dehiscence of cesarian section scar during pregnancy and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:569–73, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Thiery M. Uterine rupture and labor induction with prostaglandin (letter). Am J Obstet Gynecol 152:914, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar

Vakuumextraktion

  1. Baerthlein WC, Moodley S, Stinson SK. Comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity in midforceps delivery and midpelvis vacuum extraction. Obstet Gynecol 67:594–97, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Broekhuizen FF, Washington JM, Johnson F, Hamilton PR. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: Indications and complications 1979 to 1984. Obstet Gynecol 69:338–42, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chalmers JA, Fothergill RJ. Use of vacuum extractor (ventouse) in obstetrics. Br Med J 5187:1684–89, 1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Vacuum versus forceps [editorial]. Lancet 1:144, 1984Google Scholar
  5. Evelbauer K. Vakuum-Extraktion. Arch Gynäkol 198:523–43, 1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hickl EJ. Indikation und Risiko von Zangen- und Vakuumextraktion heute. Gynäkologe 8:13–18, 1975Google Scholar
  7. Malmström T. The vacuum-extractor. Indications and results. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 43, Suppl. 1:5–52, 1964Google Scholar
  8. Malmström T, Jansson I. Use of the vacuum extractor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 8:893–913, 1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ryden G. Vacuum extraction or forceps? [editorial]. Br Med J 292:75–76, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vorzeitiger Blasensprung

  1. Alger LS, Pupkin MJ. Etiology of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Clin Obstet Gynecol 29:758–70, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artal R, Sokol RJ, Neuman M, Burstein AH, Stojkov J. The mechanical properties of prematurely and non-prematurely ruptured membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 125:655–59, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlson DE, Platt LD, Medearis AL, Horenstein J. Quantifiable polyhydramnios: diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol 75:989–93, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Graeff H, Fischbach F. Infektionsrisiken bei unzeitigem Blasensprung. Arch Gynecol 238:234–40, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hadi HA, Hodson CA, Strickland D. Premature rupture of the membranes between 20 and 25 weeks’ gestation: role of amniotic fluid volume in perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1139–1144, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Iams JD, Stilson R, Johnson FF, Williams RA, Rice R. Symptoms that precede preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:486–90, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nagey DA, Sailer DN Jr. An analysis of the decisions in the management of premature rupture of the membranes. Clin Obstet Gynecol 29:826–34, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Newton ER, Prihoda TJ, Gibbs RS. Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for intra-amniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol 73:571–75, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Potkul RK, Moawad AH, Ponto KL. The association of subclinical infection with preterm labor: The role of C-reactive protein. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:642–45, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Romero R, Sirtori M, Oyarzun E, Avila C, Mazor M, Callahan R, Sabo V, Athanassiadis AP, Hobbins JC. Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:817–24, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wagner MV, Chin VP, Peters CJ, Drexler B, Newman LA. A comparison of early and delayed induction of labor with spontaneous rupture of membranes at term. Obstet Gynecol 74:93–97, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar

Vorzeitige Placentalösung

  1. Abdella TN, Sibai BM, Hays JM Jr, Anderson GD. Relationship of hypertensive disease to abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 63:365–70, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bond AL, Edersheim TG, Curry L, Druzin ML, Hutson JM. Expectant management of abruptio placentae before 35 weeks gestation. Am J Perinatol 6:121–23, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gonen R, Hannah ME, Milligan JE. Does prolonged preterm premature rupture of the membranes predispose to abruptio placentae? Obstet Gynecol 74:347–50, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Harris BA jr. Peripheral placental separation: A review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 43:577–81, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Krohn M, Voigt L, McKnight B, Daling JR, Starzyk P, Benedetti TJ. Correlates of placental abruption. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:333–40, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kunz S, Schlotter CM, Briel RC. Symptomatologie der vorzeitigen Lösung der Placenta während Tokolyse. Arch Gynekol 224:196–97, 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nyberg DA, Cyr DR, Mack LA, Wilson DA, Shuman WP. Sonographic spectrum of placental abruption. AJR 148:161–64, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sholl JS. Abruptio placentae: Clinical management in nonacute cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:40–51, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar

Vorzeitige Wehentätigkeit

  1. Benedetti TJ. Life-threatening complications of betamimetic therapy for preterm labor inhibition. Clin Perinatol 13:843–52, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brustman LE, Langer O, Damus K, Anyaegbunam A, Merkatz IR. Uterine contractility patterns after an episode of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 75:346–49, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Caritis SN, Darby MJ, Chan L. Pharmacologic treatment of preterm labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 31:635–51, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gauthier DW, Meyer WJ, Bieniarz A. Correlation of amniotic fluid glucose concentration and intraamniotic infection in patients with preterm labor or premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:1105–1110, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gazaway P, Mullins CL. Prevention of preterm labor and premature rupture of the membranes. Clin Obstet Gynecol 29:835–49, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Iams JD, Stilson R, Johnson FF, Williams RA, Rice R. Symptoms that precede preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:486–90, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. King JF, Grant A, Keirse MJ, Chalmers I. Beta-mimetics in preterm labour: An overview of the randomized controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95:211–22, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lipshitz J, Shaver DC, Anderson GD. Hexoprenaline tokolysis for intrapartum fetal distress and acidosis. J Reprod Med 31:1023–26, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nuwayhid B, Rajabi M. Beta-sympathomimetic agents: Use in perinatal obstetrics. Clin Perinatol 14:757–82, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar

Wachstumsretardierung

  1. Brar HS, Rutherford SE. Classification of intrauterine growth retardation. Semin Perinatol 12:2–10, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. DeVore GR, Platt LD. Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation: The use of sequential measurements of fetal growth parameters. Clin Obstet Gynecol 30:968–84, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harding JE, Charlton V. Treatment of the growth-retarded fetus by augmentation of substrate supply. Semin Perinatol 13:211–23, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kuss E. Was ist “Das Plazenta-Insuffizienzsyndrom”? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 47:664–70, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Largo RH, Wälli R, Duc G, Fanconi A, Prader A. Evaluation of perinatal growth. Helv Paediatr Acta 35:419–36, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mintz MC, Landon MB. Sonographic diagnosis of fetal growth disorders. Clin Obstet Gynecol 31:44–52, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sarmandal P, Grant JM. Effectiveness of ultrasound determination of fetal abdominal circumference and fetal ponderal index in the diagnosis of asymmetrical growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:118–23, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Teberg AJ, Walther FJ, Pena IC. Mortality, morbidity, and outcome of the small-for-gestational age infant. Semin Perinatol 12:84–94, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Villar J, Belizan JM. The evaluation of the methods used in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol Surv 41:187–99, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Weiner CP. Pathogenesis, evaluation, and potential treatments for severe, early onset growth retardation. Semin Perinatol 13:320–27, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Achim Schneider
    • 1
  • Viola Schneider
    • 2
  • Günther Schlunck
    • 3
  1. 1.Abteilung FrauenheilkundeKlinikum der Friedrich-Schiller-UniversitätJenaDeutschland
  2. 2.JenaDeutschland
  3. 3.Universitäts-AugenklinikFreiburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations