Abstract
The advantages of using a likelihood ratio for forensic evidence interpretation has long been recognised by Ian Evett[1]. This approach has gained increasing support especially in the areas of DNA and glass evidence interpretation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Evett, I.W., Buffery, C., Willot, G. and Stoney, D. (1991) J. For. Sci. Soc, 31(l):31–40.
Evett, I.W. (1990) Forensic Science Progress 4. Springer, Berlin, pp 141–179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Monahan, D.L., Cordiner, S.J., Buckleton, J.S. (1996). The Use of Likelihood Ratios in Reporting Difficult Forensic Cases. In: Carracedo, A., Brinkmann, B., Bär, W. (eds) 16th Congress of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics (Internationale Gesellschaft für forensische Hämogenetik e.V.), Santiago de Compostela, 12–16 September 1995. Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics, vol 6. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80029-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80029-0_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60492-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80029-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive