Comparison of Geopotential Recovery Capabilities of Some Future Satellite Missions

  • G. Balmino
  • F. Perosanz
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 113)

Abstract

The capabilities of presently studied satellite missions to map the Earth’s gravitational potential with unprecedented resolution and accuracy are presented in terms of error spectra on the recovered spherical harmonic coefficients of the classical expansion of the potential function. The analysis is made simpler by considering quasi-circular orbits only and the adopted time-wise approach in the frequency domain is very efficient at providing the covariance analysis results. Applications are made to the old ARISTOTELES-like project and to the STEP, GAMES, GRACE, BRIDGE and MARGOT concepts.

Keywords

Covariance Geophysics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balmino G. (1993). Orbit choice and the theory of radial orbit error for altimetry, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, Vol. 50, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Balmino G., Schrama E.J.O. and Sneeuw N. (1994). Compatibility of first-order circular orbit perturbation theories ; consequences for cross-track inclination functions, submitted to Manuscripta Geodaetica.Google Scholar
  3. Colombo O. (1989). Advanced techniques for high resolution mapping of the gravitational field, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, Vol. 25, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Kaula, W.M. (1966). Theory of Satellite geodesy, Blaisdell Pub. Co., Waltham, Mass., USA.Google Scholar
  5. Koop R. (1993). Global gravity field modelling using satellite gravity gradiometry, Delft University of Technology, Thesis, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Publication n°38.Google Scholar
  6. Makedonskii E.L., Balmino G., Galazin V.F., Kogan M.G., McNutt M.K. and Fairhead J.D. (1994). Gravity field over the former Soviet Union mapped, accepted in EOS (A.G.U.).Google Scholar
  7. Rummel R. (1989). Satellite gravity gradiometry principles and state of the art, in Study on Precise Gravity Field Determination Methods and Mission Requirements, Final Report, ESA 7521/87/F/FL.Google Scholar
  8. Rummel R., Van Gelderen M., Koop R., Schrama E., Sanso F., Brovelli M., Miggliaccio F., and Sacerdote F. (1993). Spherical Harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry, Nether. Geod. Commission, N 39.Google Scholar
  9. Schrama E.J.O. (1991). Gravity field error analysis : applications of GPS receivers and gradiometers of low orbiting platforms, J.G.R., Vol. 96, B12.Google Scholar
  10. Schwintzer P., Reigber Ch., Bode A., Kang Z., Zhu S.Y, Massmann F.H., Raimondo J.C., Biancale R., Balmino G., Lemoine J.M., Moynot B., Marty J.C., Barlier F. and Boudon Y. (1994). Improvement of global gravity field modelling : GRIM4, submitted to Bulletin Géodésique.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Balmino
    • 1
  • F. Perosanz
    • 1
  1. 1.GRGS - CNESToulouse CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations