Advertisement

Sensitivity Analysis of Potential Problem by Regular- and Singular-function Trefftz Method

  • Eisuke Kita
  • Norio Kamiya
  • Youichi Ikeda
Conference paper

Abstract

Trefftz method is the boundary-type solution procedure which uses the function satisfying the governing equation as the approximation function of the solution of the problem. The regular T-complete function and the singular fundamental solution are employed as the approximation function. In this paper, the Trefftz methods formulated by the T-complete function and the fundamental solution are referred to “regular-function Trefftz method” [3,5–8,11,12,14] and “singular-function Trefftz method” [1, 4, 9, 10, 13], respectively. In the former, the regular expressions of the physical quantaties can be obtained because the regular T-complete function is employed. However, the condition number of the system of equations to be solved becomes large. In the latter, the source points are placed outside the object domain and the solution of the problem is approximated by the linear combination of the fundamental solution. Therefore, also in this case, the formulation is regular but the computational accuracy is strongly dependednt on the placement of the collocation points.

Keywords

Fundamental Solution Boundary Element Method Regular Expression Collocation Point Object Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    H. Antes. On a regular boundary integral equation and a modified Trefftz method in Reissner’s plate theory. Engineering Analysis, 1(3):149–153, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. A. Brebbia. The Boundary Element Method for Engineers. Pentech Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Y. K. Cheung, W. G. Jin, and O. C. Zienkiewicz. Direct solution procedure for solution of harmonic problems using complete, non-singular, Trefftz functions. Coram. Appl. Num. Meth., 5:159–169, 1989.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    U. Heise. Numerical properties of integral equations in which the given boundary values and the sought solutions are defined on different curves. Comp. Struct., 8:199–205, 1978.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    I. Herrera. Boundary Methods: An Algebraic Theory. Pitman, 1984.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ch. Hochard and L. Proslier. A Trefftz method for a simplified analysis of elastic structures. In Ch. Hirsch, O. C. Zienkiewicz, and E. Oñate, editors, Numerical Methods in Engineering’92, pages 375–382, Elsevier, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Jirousek and Lan Guex. The hybrid-Trefftz finite element model and its application to plate bending. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 23:651–693, 1986.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    N. Kamiya and S. T. Wu. Generalized eigenvalue formulation of the Helmholtz equation by the Trefftz method. Engineering Computations, 11:177–186, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    E. R. A. Oliveira. Plane stress analysis by a general integral method. J. Eng. Mech. Div., Proc. ASCE, 94:79–101, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. Patterson and M. A. Sheikh. On the use of fundamental solutions in Trefftz method for potential and elasticity problems. In C. A. Brebbia, editor, Boundary Element Methods in Engineering, pages 43–57, Springer Verlag, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    K. Peters, E. Stein, and W. Wagner. A new boundary-type finite element for 2D-and 3D-elastic structures. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 37:1009–1025, 1994.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Piltner. A quadrilateral hybrid-Trefftz plate bending element for the inclusion of warping based on a three-dimensional plate formulation. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 33:387–408, 1992.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. P. Zielinski and I. Herrera. Trefftz method: fitting boundary conditions. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 24:871–891, 1987.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. P. Zielinski and O. C. Zienkiewicz. Generalized finite element analysis with T-complete boundary solution function. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 21:509–528, 1985.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eisuke Kita
    • 1
  • Norio Kamiya
    • 1
  • Youichi Ikeda
    • 2
  1. 1.Nagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Daidoh Institute of TechnologyNagoya 457Japan

Personalised recommendations