Adaptive Closed-Loop Control of End-Tidal Concentrations of Volatile Agents

  • D. R. Westenskow
Conference paper

Abstract

In inducing anesthesia with the volatile agents, the goal is to rapidly achieve the desired brain concentration without creating a dangerously high level in the arterial blood. One protocol uses high fresh-gas flows (5 l/min) and an initial inspired concentration of 3–4 MAC. When the end-tidal concentration reaches the desired level, the vaporizer setting is reduced to 120% of the desired level. After 5 min the vaporizer is set to the desired level and the fresh-gas flow reduced to 1 l/min. Automatic control of this process could be implemented in a very straightforward way. Automation would reduce the human variability and might avoid potential injury when a clinician is busy with other tasks and forgets to reduce the vaporizer setting at the appropriate time. This chapter will review the design of the automatic controller and present its clinical advantages.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tatnall ML, Morris P, West PG (1981) Controlled anaesthesia: an approach using patient characteristics identified during uptake. Br J Anaesth 53: 1019–1025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Messer TM (1994) Control techniques for automated delivery of anesthesia: halo thane system. Masters Thesis, University of UtahGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loughlin PJ (1988) Computer-assisted anesthesia: a control system to aid the anesthetist in efficiently administering oxygen and anesthetic gases. Masters Thesis, University of UtahGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith NT, Quinn ML, Fukui Y, Fleming R, Coles JR (1984) Automatic control in anesthesia: a comparison in performance between the anesthetist and the machine. Anesth Analg 63: 715–722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Hara DA, Bogen DK, Noordergraaf A (1992) The use of computers for controlling the delivery of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 77: 563–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Westenskow DR, Meline L, Pace NL (1987) Controlled hypotension with sodium nitroprusside: anesthesiologist versus computer. J Clin Monit 3: 80–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fukui Y, Smith NT, Fleming RA (1982) Digital and sampled-data control of arterial blood pressure during halothane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 61: 1010–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zbinden AM, Frei R, Westenskow DR, Thomson DA (1986) Control of end-tidal halothane concentration. Br J Anaesth 58: 563–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luttropp HH, Rydgren G, Tomasson R, Werner O (1991) A minimal-flow system for xenon anesthesia. Anesthesiology 75: 896–902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zwart A, Smith NT, Beneken JEW (1972) Multiple model approach to uptake and distribution of halothane: the use of an analog computer. Comput Biomed Res 5:228– 238Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Millard RK, Monk CP, Prys-Roberts C (1988) Self-tuning control of hypotension during ENT surgery using a volatile anaesthetic IEE Proc 135D.-95–105Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monk CR, Millard RK, Hutton P, Prys-Roberts C (1989) Automatic arterial pressure regulation using isoflurane: comparison with manual control. Br J Anaesth 63: 22–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rehman HU, Linkens DA, Asbury AJ (1993) Neural networks and nonlinear regression modeling and control of depth of anaesthesia for spontaneously breathing and ventilated patient. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 40: 227–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Westenskow

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations