Skip to main content

Subjective Quality of Life Assessment in Therapeutic Trials: Presentation of a New Instrument in France (SQLP: Subjective Quality of Life Profile) and First Results

  • Conference paper
Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives

Summary

In therapeutic trials, quality of life studies are usually based on a health model which results in a restrictive view. Therefore, it is important to clearly define the concept of the quality of life, since ambiguous concepts can alter the results. The key to this problem is the clear distinction between the two components of the quality of life, i.e., subjective and objective. The latter component is the only one considered in the current medical approach.

The use of the subjective quality of life introduces a number of methodological problems not found when the objective quality of life is assessed, and thus requires a specific model which can be derived from the model of “life goals” used by sociologists. This model is presented here and illustrated with some results obtained with a new questionnaire, the Subjective Quality of Life Profile (SQLP). We suggest that both subjective and objective quality of life studies should be considered in order to emphasize the humanistic approach to therapeutic indications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews FM, Witney SB (1976) Social indicators of well-being: American’s perception of life quality. New York, Plenum Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzecri JP (1979) L’analyse des données. Dunod 3°ed

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner M (1987) Development, testing and use of the Sickness Impact Profile. In: Walker SR, Rosser RM (eds) Quality of life: assessment and application. MTP Press Limited, Lancaster, Boston, The Hague, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim JL, Buyse M (1983) The anamnestic comparative self-assessment for measuring the subjective quality of life of cancer patients. J Psychol Soc 14: 25.38

    Google Scholar 

  • Cella DF, Tulsky DS (1991) Measuring quality of life today: methodological aspects (Appendix pp 209–232). Oncology 4: 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers LW (1987) The McMaster Health Index questionnaire: an update. In: Walker SR, Rosser RM (eds) Quality of life: assessment and application. MTP Press Limited, Lancaster, Boston, The Hague, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumbaugh JC (1968) Cross-validation of Purpose-in-life Test based on Frankl’s concepts. J Individ Psychol 24: 74–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerin P, Dazord A, Boissel JP, Hanauer MT, Moleur P, Chauvin F (1989) L’evaluation de la qualité de la vie dans les essais thérapeutiques. Aspects conceptuels et pré sentation d’un questionnaire. Thérapie 44: 355–364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerin P, Dazord A, Boissel JP, Hanauer MT (1990) Assessment of quality of life in therapeutic trials. In: Strauch G, Husson JM (eds) Recent trends in clinical pharmacology.EDITIONS INSERM, 186: 143–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerin P, Dazord A, Cialdella P, Leizorovicz A, Boissel JP, and the OCAPI Research Group (1991) Le questionnaire < <Profil de la Qualité de la Vie Subjective> > (PQVS). Premiers éléments de validation. Thérapie 46: 131–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerin P, Dazord A, Boissel JP, Chifflet R (1992) Quality of life assessment in therapeutic trials: rationale for and presentation of a more appropriate instrument. Fund Clin PharmacoI 6: 263–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce CRB (1987) Quality of life: the state of the art in clinical assessment. In: Walker SR, Rosser RM (eds) Quality of life: assessment and application. MTP Press, Limited, Lancaster, Boston, The Hague, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH (1949) The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents against cancer. In: McLeod CM (ed) Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky L, Crits-Cristoph P, Alexander L, Margolis M, Cohen M (1983) Two helping alliance methods of predicting outcomes of psychotherapy: a counting signs versus a global rating method. J Nervous Mental Dis 171: 590–603

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen J (1987) The Nottingham Health Profile: In: Walker SR, Rosser RM (eds) Quality of life: assessment and application. MTP Press Limited, Lancaster, Boston, The Hague, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery SA, Asberg M (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Brit J Psychiat 134: 382–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé H (1959) The analysis of variance. New York, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for behavioral sciences. MCGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dazord, A., Gerin, P., Boissel, J.P. (1994). Subjective Quality of Life Assessment in Therapeutic Trials: Presentation of a New Instrument in France (SQLP: Subjective Quality of Life Profile) and First Results. In: Orley, J., Kuyken, W. (eds) Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79125-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79123-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics