The Role of the Macrophage in Early Post-traumatic Immunosuppression

  • C. C. Baker
Conference paper


The macrophage has achieved an area of preeminence over the last 10 years in sharp contradistinction to its previous image as a relatively inert phagocyte. This chapter will attempt to give some background on the reasons why the macrophage is important in trauma and multiple organ failure, some specific studies relating to post-traumatic immunosuppression, and some thoughts about future directions.


Femur Fracture Multiple Organ Failure Macrophage Function Antigen Recognition Cecal Ligation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baker CC, Openheimer L, Stephens B, Lewis FR, Trunkey DD (1980) The epidemiology of trauma deaths. Am J Surg 140:144–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maier RV (1993) The angry macrophage and its impact on host response mechanisms. In: Faist E, Merakins J, Schildberg R (eds) Host defense dysfunction in trauma, shock, and sepsis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 191–197Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wells CL, Jechorek RP, Gillingham KJ (1991) Relative contributions of host and microbial factors in bacterial translocation. Acta Med Scand 126:247–252Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker CC, Yamada A, Faist E, Kupper TS (1987) Interleukin-1 and T cell function following injury. J Burn Care Rehabil 8:503–508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lancaster JR Jr (1992) Nitric oxide in cells. Am Sci 80:248–259Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker CC, Miller CL, Trunkey DD (1979) Identity of mononuclear cells which compromise trauma patients’ resistance. J Surg Res 26:478–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Faist E, Kupper TS, Baker CC, Chaudry IH, Dwyer J, Baue AE (1986) Depression of cellular immunity after major injury: its association with posttraumatic complications and its restoration with immunomodulating agents. Arch Surg 121:100–105Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faist E, Mewes A, Baker CC, Strasser T, Alkan SS, Reiber P, Heberer G (1987) Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)-dependent suppression of IL-2 production in patients with major trauma. J Trauma 27:837–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wichterman KA, Baue AE, Chaudry IH (1980) Sepsis and septic shock — a review of laboratory models and a proposal. J Surg Res 29:189–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baker CC, Chaudry IH, Gaines HO, Baue AE (1983) Evaluation of factors affecting mortality rate after sepsis in a murine + cecal ligation and puncture model. Surgery 94(2):331–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaye J, Gillis S, Mizel SB et al. (1984) Growth of a cloned T cell line induced by monoclonal antibody specific for antigen receptor: interleukin-1 is required for the expression of receptors to interleukin-2. J Immunol 133:1339–1345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baker CC, Niven-Fairchild AS, Yamada A, Caragnano CL, Kupper TS (1991) Macrophage antigen presentation and interleukin-1 production after cecal ligation and puncture in C3H/HeN and C3H/HeJ mice. Arch Surg 126:253–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baker CC, Niven-Fairchild T, Caragnano C, Kupper TS (1991) Outcome following femur fracture and subsequent cecal ligation and puncture in endotoxin-sensitive (C3H/HeN) and Endotoxin-resistant (C3H/HeJ) mice. J Surg Res 50: 170–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schirmer WJ, Schirmer JM, Townsend MC, Fry DE (1988) Femur fracture with associated soft-tissue injury produces hepatic ischemia. Arch Surg 231:412–415Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. C. Baker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations