Cellular and Tissular Effects of Shock Wave-Induced Cavitation: Potential Application to Digestive Cancers

  • F. Prat
  • A. Arefiev

Abstract

Cavitation is assumed to be the essential factor of toxic interactions between acoustic fields and tissues. This property is likely to offer therapeutic potentialities for some cancers. However, the natural behaviour of shock waves in tissues does not induce irreversible damage. The enhancement of cavitation, either through the saturation of the focal field with gas-containing micro-bubbles or by using a specific generator characterized by a negative half-cycle waveform, may overcome this difficulty, we present a series of works undertaken to validate this hypothesis and enhance the clinical potential on necrosis-inducing extracorporeal focused cavitation.

Key words

Cancer cells Digestive cancer Cavitation Microbubbles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anon. (1983) World Health Organisation. Prevention of liver cancer: Report of WHO meeting In: World Health Organization Technical Report Series. Geneva: World Helth Organization 7–8Google Scholar
  2. Berens ME, Welander CE, Griffin AS, McCullough DL (1989) Effect of acoustic shock waves on clonogenic growth and drug sensitivity of human tumour cells in vitro. J. Urol. 142: 1090–1094Google Scholar
  3. Coleman AJ, Saunders JE (1993) A rewiew of the physical properties and biologcal effects of the high amplitude acoustic fields used in extracorporeal lithotripsy. Ultrasonics 31:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Durrant LG, Morris DL (1990) Shock waves increase the sensitivity of human gastric and colorectal cancer cells to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Gut 31: A526 (Abtsr.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flint EB, Suslick KS (1991) The temperature of cavitation. Science 253: 1397–1399CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Gambihler S, Delius M, Brendel W (1990) Biological effects of shock waves: cell disruption, viability, and proliferation of L1210 cells exposed to shock waves in vitro. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 16: 587–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geldof AA, De Voogt HJ, Rao BR (1989) High energy shock waves do not affect either primary tumor growth or metastasis of prostate carcinoma R3327 MatLyLu. Urol. Res 17: 9–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holmes RP, Yeaman LI, Li W, Hart LJ, Wallen CA, Woodruff RD, McCullough DL (1990) The combined effects of shock waves and cisplatin therapy on rat prostate tumours. J. Urology 144: 159–163Google Scholar
  9. Hoshi S, Orikasa S, Kuwahara MA, Yoshikawa K, Ohyama C, Satoh M, I Kawamura S, Nose M (1990) The effect of high energy shock waves on implanted urinary bladder cancer in rabbits. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 81: 317–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Laudone VP, Morgan TR, Huryk RF, Heston WD, Fair WR (1989) Cytotoxicity of high energy shock waves: methodologic considerations. J. Urology 141: 965–8Google Scholar
  11. Morton Kl, Ter Haar GR, Stratford IJ, Hill CR (1982) The role of cavitation in the interaction of ultrasound with V79 Chinese hamster cells in vitro. Br. J. Cancer 45: 147–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oosterhof GON, Smits GAHJ, De Ruyter AE, Schalken JA, De Bruyne FMJ (1991) Effects of high energy shock waves combined with biological response modifiers in different human kidney cancer xenografts. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 17: 391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oosterhof GON, Smits GAHJ, De Ruyter AE, Schalken JA, De Bruyne FMJ (1990) In vivo effects of high energy shock waves on urological tumours. An evaluation of treatment modalities. J. Urology 144: 785–789Google Scholar
  14. Prat F, Ponchon T, Berger F, Chapelon JY, Cathignol D (1991) Hepatic lesions in the rabbit induced by acoustic cavitation. Gastroenterology 100: 1345–1350Google Scholar
  15. Plat F, Chapelon JY, ChaufFert B, Ponchon T, Cathignol D (1991) Cytotoxic effects of acoustic cavitation on HT-29 cells and a rat colon carcinomatosis in vitro. Cancer Res. 51: 3024–3029Google Scholar
  16. Prat F, Chapelon JY, Abou El Fadil F, Theilliere Y, Ponchon T, Cathignol D (1993a) In vivo effects of cavitation alone or in combination with chemotherapy in a metastatic colon cancer in the rat. Br. J. Cancer 68:13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prat F, Sibille A, Luccioni C, Pansu D, Chapelon JY, Ponchon T, Cathignol D (1993 b) Increased chemotoxicity to colon cancer cells by shock-wave induced cavitation. Accepted to GastroenterologyGoogle Scholar
  18. Prat F, Chapelon JY, Abou El Fadil F, Sibille A, Theilliere Y, Ponchon T, Cathignol D (1994) Focused liver ablation by cavitation in the rabbit: a potential new method of extra-corporeal therapy. Gut 35: 395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Randazzo RF, Chaussy CG, Fuchs GJ, Bhuta SM, Lovrekovitch H, De Kernion JB (1988) The in vitro and in vivo effects of extracorporeal shock waves on malignant cells. Urol. Res 16: 419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Russo P, Stephenson RA, Mies C, Huryk R, Heston WDW, Melamed MR, Fair WR (1986) High energy shock waves suppress tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. J. Urology 135: 626–628Google Scholar
  21. Russo P, Myies C, Huryk R, Heston WDW, Fair WR (1987) Histopathologic and ultrastructural correlates of tumour growth suppression by high energy shock waves. J. Endourology 137: 338–341Google Scholar
  22. Smits GHJ, Oosterhof GON, De Ruyter AE, Schalken JA, Debruyne FMJ (1991) Cytotoxic effects of high energy shock waves in different in vitro models: influence of the experimental set-up. J. Urology 145:171–175Google Scholar
  23. van Dongen JW, van Steenbrugge GJ, Romitn JC, Schroder FH (1989) The cytocidal effect of high energy shock waves on human prostate tumour cell lines. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 25: 1173–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weiss N, Delius M, Gambihler S, Dirschedl P, Goetz A, Brendel W (1990) Influence of the shock wave application mode on the growth of A-Mel 3 and SSK2 tumours in vivo. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 16: 595–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilmer A, Gambihler S, Delius M, Brendel W (1989) In vitro cytotoxic activity of lithotripter shock waves combined with adriamycin or with cisplatin on L1210 mouse leukemia cells. J. Cancer Res. Clin; Oncol. 115: 229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zeman RK, Davros WJ, Garra BS, Goldberg JA, Hayes WS, Catteu EL, Horii SC, Cooper CJ, Silverman PM (1990) Cavitation effects during lithotripsy. Part II. Clinical observations. Radiology 177:163–166Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Prat
    • 1
  • A. Arefiev
    • 1
  1. 1.INSERM U281; 151Cours Albert ThomasLyon Cedex 03France

Personalised recommendations