Skip to main content

Alternatives for the Traditional Overhead Cost Allocation

  • Chapter
  • 253 Accesses

Abstract

For years, in industrial firms the ratio of overhead costs to total costs has been increasing. This development involved a search for alternatives for the traditional overhead percentage cost accounting systems in manufacturing departments (for example with the machine overhead rate accounting) and in indirect departments afterwards. In the following, problems of the traditional overhead cost allocation are discussed and possible solutions are pointed out. In the second chapter, a method is described which makes it possible to allocate manufacturing overhead costs to different products easily. The paper finishes with a general description of an activity based overhead cost allocation.

Keywords

  • Activity Cost
  • Index Number
  • Cost Driver
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Overhead Cost

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Coenenberg, A. G. and Fischer, T. M. (1991), “Prozeßkostenrechnung — Strategische Neuorientierung in der Kostenrechnung”, DBW 51, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (1989), “You Need a New Cost System When…”, Harvard Business Review, Jan. — Feb. 1989, 76 – 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (1992), “Activity-Based Costing”, Handbuch der Kostenrechnung (Hrsg. W. Mannel), Wiesbaden, 360–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • COoper, R. and Kaplan, R. S. (1988), “Measure Costs Right: Make the Right Decisions”, Harvard Business Review, Sept - Oct., 96 – 103

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, A. and Jorasz, W. (1992), “Kalkulation von Fertigungsgemeinkosten bei Verwendung mehrerer Bezugsgrößen”, Handbuch der Kostenrechnung (Hrsg. W. Mannel), Wiesbaden, 563–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, I. and Mayer, R. (1989), “Prozeßkostenrechnung — Der neue Weg zu mehr Kostentransparenz und wirkungsvolleren Unternehmensstrategien”, Controlling 4, 214–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • JORASZ, W. and CHRISTMANN, A. (1989), “Anwendung von differenzierten Bezugsgrößenkalkulationen in anlageintensiven Unternehmen”, krp 3/89, 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (1992), “Prozeßkostenrechnung und Prozeßkostenmanagement: Konzept, Vorgehensweise und Einsatzmöglichkeiten”, Prozeßkostenmanagement (Hrsg. I. Horváth & Partner), München, 75 – 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, H.-C. and Stölzle, W. (1991), “Anwendungsbedingungen, Verfahren und Beurteilung der Prozeßkostenrechnung in industriellen Unternehmen”, ZfB 61. Jahrgang, 1281 – 1305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Christmann, A. (1993). Alternatives for the Traditional Overhead Cost Allocation. In: Diewert, W.E., Spremann, K., Stehling, F. (eds) Mathematical Modelling in Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78508-5_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78508-5_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78510-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78508-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive