Tropospheric Photochemistry and its Response to UV Changes

  • Sasha Madronich
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 8)

Abstract

The photochemistry of the troposphere is highly non-linear, and may be changing due to emissions of gases related to human activities. Increases in tropospheric ultraviolet (UV) radiation, due to stratospheric ozone depletion, may also perturb the troposphere.

Keywords

Biomass Methane Sulfide Toluene Hydrocarbon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atlas E, Ridley BA, Hubler G, Walega JG, Carroll MA, Montzka DD, Huebert BJ, Norton RB, Grahek FE, and Schauffler S (1992) Partitioning and budget of NOy species during the Mauna Loa Observatory photochemistry experiment. J Geophys Res 97: 10449–10462Google Scholar
  2. Carroll MA, Ridley BA, Montzka DD, Hubler G, Walega JG, Norton RB, Huebert BJ, and Grahek FE (1992) Measurement of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide during the Mauna Loa Observatory photochemistry experiment. J Geophys Res 97: 10361–10374Google Scholar
  3. Gery MW (1989) Tropospheric air quality. In: UNEP Environmental Effects Panel Report. J. C. van der Leun, M. Tevini, and R. C. Worrest (eds) United Nations Environmental Programme, Nairobi KenyaGoogle Scholar
  4. IPCC (1990) Climate Change. In: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Report by Working Group 1. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu SC and Trainer M (1988) Responses of tropospheric ozone and odd hydrogen radicals to column ozone changes. J Atmos Chem 6: 221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Levy II, H (1971) Normal atmosphere: large radical and formaldehyde concentrations predicted. Science 173: 141–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Logan J A, Prather MJ, Wofsy SC, and McElroy MB (1981) Tropospheric chemistry: a global perspective. J Geophys Res 86: 7210–7254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Madronich S and Granier C (1992) Impact of recent total ozone changes on tropospheric ozone photodissociation, hydroxyl radicals, and methane trends. Geophys Res Lett 19: 465–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ridley BA, Madronich S, Chatfield RB, Walega JG, Shetter RE, Carroll MA, and Montzka DD (1992) Measurements and model simulations of the photostationary state during MLOPEX: Implications for radical concentrations and ozone production and loss rates. J Geophys Res 97: 10375–10388Google Scholar
  10. Schnell RC, Liu SC, Oltmans SJ, Stone RS, Hoffman DJ, Dutton EG, Deshler T, Sturges WT, Harder JW, Sewell SD, Trainer M and Harris JM (1991) Decreases of summer tropospheric ozone concentrations in Antarctica. Nature 351: 726–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stolarski RS, Bloomfield P, McPeters RD, and Herman JR (1991) Total ozone trends deduced from Nimbus 7 TOMS data. Geophys Res Lett 18: 1015–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Thompson AM (1992) The oxidizing capacity of the earth’s atmosphere: Probable past and future changes. Science 256: 1157–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. WMO (1991) Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1991. World Meteorological Organization Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No 25, GenevaaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sasha Madronich
    • 1
  1. 1.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations