Quantitative Analysis of the Skin’s Surface by Digital Signal Processing

  • U. Hoppe
  • R. Lunderstadt
  • G. Sauermann


The human skin’s three dimensional surface is subjected to continuous structural changes. These result from the influences of the seasons, climate, diurnal rhythms, pathological conditions, age, psychic reactions, and cosmetics [1–6].


Digital Signal Processing Amplitude Spectrum Skin Sample Periodic Component Stochastic Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hoppe U (1976) Topologie der Hautoberfldche. Symposium “Stratum comeum ” Berlin, 3–4 December 1976Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoppe U Müller L (1977) Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Rauhigkeit der Oberfldche der menschlichen Haut. DBP 2719341; 30 April 1977Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoppe U (1979) Topologie der Hautoberfläche. J Soc Cosmet Chem 30: 213–239Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoppe U (1981) “Stratum corneum” Struktur and Function. Klaschka F (ed) 1981 In: Cosmetic technology. Grosse, Berlin, pp 141–158Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoppe U (1981) The topology of the skin, part I. Cosmet Technol Febr. 1981 XX: 54–59Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoppe U (1981) The topology of the skin part II. Cosmet Technol March 1981 XX: 32–38Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cook TH (1980) Profilometry of skin—a useful tool for the substantiation of cosmetic efficacy. J Soc Cosmet Chem 31: 339–359Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cook TH, Craft TJ, Brunelle RL, Norris F, GriffinWA (1982) Quantification of the skin’s topography by skin profilometry. Int J Cosmet Sci 4: 195–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barbenel JC, Makki S, Agache P (1980) The variability of skin surface contours. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 8 (2) 175–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marks R, Nicholls SC (1981) Drugs which influence the stratum corneum and techniques for their evaluation. Clin Exp Dermatol 6: 419–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Makki S, Mignot J, Nadvornik IM, Agache P (1982) Statistical analysis of human skin microtopographical profiles. Proceedings of the 12th IFSCC congress, Paris 13–17 September 1982, E 2, pp 257–269Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deutsche Norm DIN 4760 bis 4766, 4768 and 4769, 4771 bis 4775. Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bendat JS, Piersol AG, Random data: analysis and measurement procedures. Wiley, (1980) New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mesch F (1980) Beschreibung rauher Oberfldchen lurch zweidimensionale Korrelations-funktionen and Spektren. V Oberflächenkolloquium, DresdenGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lunderstädt R, (1980) Rechnerorientierte Verfahren der Regelungstechnik, Teil I II: Stochastische Systeme. Lecture, Hochschule der Bundeswehr Hamburg (HSBwH), HamburgGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Papoulis A (1965) Probability, random variables and stochastic processes Mc-Graw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Korn GA, Korn TM (1961) Mathematical handbook for scientists and engineers. Mc-Graw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oppenheirn AV, Schafer RW (1975) Digital signal processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bitz G (1982) Verfahren zur Bestimmung von Rauhigkeitskenngr, 5Ben lurch Specklekorrelation. VDI Fortschrittsbericht, part 8, no. 47, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Hoppe
    • 1
  • R. Lunderstadt
    • 2
  • G. Sauermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Paul Gerson, Unna, Forschungszentrum Beiersdorf AGHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Universität der BundeswehrHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations