Abstract
In those countries that have acquired considerable experience in the field of breast cancer screening by mammography, it is now generally acknowledged that a comprehensive system of quality assurance is a fundamental requirement. The reason for this is that mammography is a far from ideal screening test in that it requires a very high level of performance in the production and interpretation of the images to perform the function of a screening test successfully. In this context it is perhaps relevant to contrast mammography with a simple chest X-ray as a screening test. To produce a satisfactory chest X-ray, any standard films with moderate performance can be used: the performance of the intensifying screens is likewise uncritical, there is no need for a moving grid, exposure control is simple with considerable latitude, and the equipment required to produce the image can be very basic. There are no particular problems when processing the exposed film and the variations in normal appearances are considerably less than is the case in mammography. A satisfactory screening mammogram, on the other hand, requires a very high quality dedicated film-screen combination whose performance needs constant checking. The mammography unit required to produce the mammogram is necessarily dedicated and is subject to a detailed high specification in all aspects of its operation which again need constant monitoring. Positioning of the patient for the examination is a highly skilled operation and requires considerable training and experience. The processing of mammograms is a specialised process and dedicated processing facilities are needed. As with all other aspects of image production, the performance of the processing unit should be closely monitored. Sensitometric testing of the processor is necessary daily and sometimes more frequently. Finally, a high level of training and experience is needed to enable a radiologist to read screening mammograms successfully and reliably. For the process of screening by mammography to be successful, all elements in the chain must operate at an optimal level or the number of cancers missed by the process inevitably rises. Thus, mammography can only be an efficient screening test if strict quality-assurance guidelines exist for all aspects of any screening programme.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Roberts MM: Breast screening: time for a rethink? Br Med J 1989 (299):1153–1155
Dean C, Roberts MM, French K, Robinson S: Psychiatric morbidity after screening for breast cancer. J Epidemiol Comm Hlth 1986 (42):1239–1241
Ellman R, Angeli N, Christians A, Moss S, Chamberlain J, Maguire P: Psychiatric morbidity associated with screening for breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1989 (60):781–784
Gram IT, Lund E, Slenker SE: Quality of life following a false positive mammogram. Br J Cancer 1990 (62):1018–1022
de Koning HJ, van Oortmarssen GJ, van Ineveld BM, van der Maas PJ: Breast cancer screening: its impact on clinical medicine. Br J Cancer 1990 (61):292–297
Forrest P: Breast Cancer Screening. Report to the Health Ministers of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland by a working group chaired by Prof. Sir Patrick Forrest. London 1986
de Haes JCJM, de Koning HJ, van Oortmarssen GJ, van Agt HME, de Bruyn AE, van der Maas PJ: The impact of a breast cancer screening programme on quality-adjusted life-years. Int J Cancer 1991 (49):538–544
de Koning HJ, van Ineveld BM, van Oortmarssen GJ, de Haes JCJM, Collette HJA, Hendriks JHCL, van der Maas PJ: Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors. Int J Cancer 1991 (49):531–537
Torrance GW: Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 1976 (10):129–136
van Oortmarssen GJ, Habbema JDF, van der Maas PJ, de Koning HJ, Colette HJA, Verbeek ALM, Geerts AT, Lubbe KTN: A model for breast cancer screening. Cancer 1990 (66): 1601–1612
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kirkpatrick, A.E. (1993). Quality Control in Mammography. In: Gad, A., Del Turco, M.R. (eds) Breast Cancer Screening in Europe. ESO Monographs. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78154-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78154-4_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78156-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78154-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive