Skip to main content

Quality Control in Mammography

  • Conference paper
Breast Cancer Screening in Europe

Part of the book series: ESO Monographs ((ESO MONOGRAPHS))

  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

In those countries that have acquired considerable experience in the field of breast cancer screening by mammography, it is now generally acknowledged that a comprehensive system of quality assurance is a fundamental requirement. The reason for this is that mammography is a far from ideal screening test in that it requires a very high level of performance in the production and interpretation of the images to perform the function of a screening test successfully. In this context it is perhaps relevant to contrast mammography with a simple chest X-ray as a screening test. To produce a satisfactory chest X-ray, any standard films with moderate performance can be used: the performance of the intensifying screens is likewise uncritical, there is no need for a moving grid, exposure control is simple with considerable latitude, and the equipment required to produce the image can be very basic. There are no particular problems when processing the exposed film and the variations in normal appearances are considerably less than is the case in mammography. A satisfactory screening mammogram, on the other hand, requires a very high quality dedicated film-screen combination whose performance needs constant checking. The mammography unit required to produce the mammogram is necessarily dedicated and is subject to a detailed high specification in all aspects of its operation which again need constant monitoring. Positioning of the patient for the examination is a highly skilled operation and requires considerable training and experience. The processing of mammograms is a specialised process and dedicated processing facilities are needed. As with all other aspects of image production, the performance of the processing unit should be closely monitored. Sensitometric testing of the processor is necessary daily and sometimes more frequently. Finally, a high level of training and experience is needed to enable a radiologist to read screening mammograms successfully and reliably. For the process of screening by mammography to be successful, all elements in the chain must operate at an optimal level or the number of cancers missed by the process inevitably rises. Thus, mammography can only be an efficient screening test if strict quality-assurance guidelines exist for all aspects of any screening programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Roberts MM: Breast screening: time for a rethink? Br Med J 1989 (299):1153–1155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dean C, Roberts MM, French K, Robinson S: Psychiatric morbidity after screening for breast cancer. J Epidemiol Comm Hlth 1986 (42):1239–1241

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellman R, Angeli N, Christians A, Moss S, Chamberlain J, Maguire P: Psychiatric morbidity associated with screening for breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1989 (60):781–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gram IT, Lund E, Slenker SE: Quality of life following a false positive mammogram. Br J Cancer 1990 (62):1018–1022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Koning HJ, van Oortmarssen GJ, van Ineveld BM, van der Maas PJ: Breast cancer screening: its impact on clinical medicine. Br J Cancer 1990 (61):292–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Forrest P: Breast Cancer Screening. Report to the Health Ministers of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland by a working group chaired by Prof. Sir Patrick Forrest. London 1986

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Haes JCJM, de Koning HJ, van Oortmarssen GJ, van Agt HME, de Bruyn AE, van der Maas PJ: The impact of a breast cancer screening programme on quality-adjusted life-years. Int J Cancer 1991 (49):538–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Koning HJ, van Ineveld BM, van Oortmarssen GJ, de Haes JCJM, Collette HJA, Hendriks JHCL, van der Maas PJ: Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors. Int J Cancer 1991 (49):531–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Torrance GW: Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 1976 (10):129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Oortmarssen GJ, Habbema JDF, van der Maas PJ, de Koning HJ, Colette HJA, Verbeek ALM, Geerts AT, Lubbe KTN: A model for breast cancer screening. Cancer 1990 (66): 1601–1612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kirkpatrick, A.E. (1993). Quality Control in Mammography. In: Gad, A., Del Turco, M.R. (eds) Breast Cancer Screening in Europe. ESO Monographs. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78154-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78154-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78156-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78154-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics