Gravity Field Determination for the Territory of Croatia

Preliminary Results
  • T. Bašić
  • K. Čolić
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 112)


As a independent state, Croatia needs much better knowledge of the gravity field parameters, especially in connection with the present realization of GPS-measurements on its territory. In order to get the best possible gravity field solution in the case of really large relief variety, different kind of data — gravity anomalies, vertical deflections, satellite altimetry — has to be appropriately combined, taking also into account the topographic/bathymetric information. In this paper some preliminary results for the gravimetric geoid are presented for the first time. It’s comparison with the existing astrogeodetic solution for Slovenia and a part of Croatia is given and future possible steps described.


Gravity Field Gravity Anomaly Digital Terrain Model Altimeter Data Vertical Deflection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bašić, T. (1991): Recovery of gravity anomalies and geoid undulations using satellite altimeter data and bathymetric data. Wiss. Arb. d. Fachr. Verm. wesen, Univ. Hannover, Nr. 172, 37–45, Hannover 1991.Google Scholar
  2. Bašić, T. and R.H. Rapp (1992): Oceanwide prediction of gravity anomalies and sea surface heights using Geos-3, Seasat and Geosat altimeter data and Etopo5u bathymetric data. Dept. of Geod. Sci. and Surv. Rep. 416, Ohio State Univ., Columbus 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Colié, K., T. Basié, S. Petrovié, B. Pribicevié, M. Ratkajec, H. Sünkel, N. Kühtreiber (1992a): New geoid solution for Slovenia and a part of Croatia. IAG-1st Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe, Prague 1992, (Proceedings in print).Google Scholar
  4. Colié, K., T. Bas“ié, S. Petrovié, B. Pribicevié, M. Ratkajec (1992b): Improved geoid solution for Slovenia and a part of Croatia. 7th Int. Symp. ”Geodesy and Physics of the Earth“, Potsdam 1992 (This Proceedings).Google Scholar
  5. Denker, H. (1989): A new gravimetric quasigeoid for the Federal Republic of Germany, Deutsche Geod. Komm., Reihe B, Nr. 291, München 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Forsberg, R. (1984): A Study of Terrain Reductions, Density Anomalies and Geophysical Inversion Methods in Gravity Field Modelling. Dept. of Geod. Sci. and Surv. Rep. 355, Ohio State Univ., Columbus 1984.Google Scholar
  7. Forsberg, R. and D. Solheim (1988): Performance of FFT Methods in Local Gravity Field Modelling. Chapman Conf. on Progress in the Determination of Earth’s Gravity Field, Ft. Lauderdale 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Bašić
    • 1
  • K. Čolić
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of GeodesyUniversity of ZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations