Skip to main content
  • 225 Accesses

Abstract

The propose-and-revise strategy is suitable for deriving values for a set of parameters. It makes possible an efficient, sequential determination of the parameter values, even when the search space is locally or globally under- or over-determined or when cyclic relationships exist. Its flexibility results from the fact that the parameter values first proposed can be corrected at any time with “revision knowledge” if this turns out to be necessary. It is suitable for cyclic parameter relationships because loops can be broken by taking a cyclic parameter as a starting parameter and estimating its value. If a contradiction occurs in the subsequent calculations on account of the cyclic relations, the parameter value is raised or lowered (Fig. 23.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Hartinger, M. and Wedel, T.: Stand des Expertensystems PAREX-CO zur wissensbasierten dynamischen Konfiguration von Parametern des PPS-Modularprogramms COPICS, Memo 1/1990, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Department of Business Computer Science, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, S.: SALT: A Knowledge Acquisition Tool for Propose-and-Revise Systems, in Marcus, S. (ed.): Automating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, Chap. 4, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988 (a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, S., Stout, J. and McDermott, J.: VT: An Expert Elevator Designer That Uses Knowledge-Based Backtracking, AI Magazine 9, 95–111, 1988 (b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, S. and McDermott, J.: SALT: A Knowledge Acquisition Language for Propose-and-Revise Systems, AI Journal 39, 1–38, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Puppe, F. (1993). Propose and Revise. In: Systematic Introduction to Expert Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77971-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77971-8_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77973-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77971-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics