Skip to main content

Using the System-Model-Operator Metaphor for Knowledge Acquisition

  • Conference paper
Book cover Second Generation Expert Systems

Abstract

The systems-model-operator perspective provides a unifying perspective for the ways that expert systems represent, organize, and apply knowledge representations. We use this metaphor to develop Topo, an expert system for configuration of computer networks. Generalizing Topo, we show that its modeling language and operators can be adapted to other tasks that require relating a physical/organizational structure to a service-supply network. This experiment demonstrates how expert systems can be generalized and more easily related to each other if we express control knowledge in terms of operators for constructing system models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chandrasekaran, B.: “Expert systems: Matching techniques to tasks,” in AI Applications for Business, W. Reitman, ed., Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, (1984) 116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clancey, W. J.: Heuristic classification, Artificial Intelligence 27 (1985) 289–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clancey, W. J.: Model Construction Operators, Artificial Intelligence 53 (1992) 1–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayes-Roth, B., Hewett, M., Vaughan Johnson, M., and Garvey, A.: “ACCORD: A Framework for a Class of Design Tasks,” Tech. Report KSL-88-19, Stanford Univ., Palo Alto, CA (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marcus, S.: Automating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. McDermott, J.: “Preliminary steps toward a taxonomy of problem-solving methods,” in Automating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, S. Marcus, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwood, MA (1988) 225–256.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McDermott, J.: R1: A rule-based configurer of computer systems, Artificial Intelligence 19 (1982) 39–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Musen, M.: Automated support for building and extending expert models, Machine Learning 4 (1989) 347–377.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson, T. and Clancey, W.J.: A qualitative modeling shell for process diagnosis, IEEE Software 3 (1986) 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Melle, W.: A Domain-Independent System that Aids in Constructing Knowledge-Based Consultation Pprograms, doctoral dissertation, Stanford Univ., Computer Science Department, Palo Alto, CA, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Clancey, W.J., Barbanson, M. (1993). Using the System-Model-Operator Metaphor for Knowledge Acquisition. In: David, JM., Krivine, JP., Simmons, R. (eds) Second Generation Expert Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77927-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77927-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77929-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77927-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics