Advertisement

Mathematical Morphology in Hierarchical Image Representation

  • O. Ying-Lie
  • Alexander Toet
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 98)

Abstract

Hierarchical structural image representations that are based on mathematical morphology are presented. Morphological operations specifically manipulate the shapes in the image, and only alter certain details without affecting the remaining image structure. A morphological hierarchical representation reflects the natural decomposition of shapes in the image.

Keywords

Original Image Image Representation Description Method Mathematical Morphology Morphological Operation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burt, P.J. (1984). The pyramid as a structure for efficient computation. In: Multiresolution image processing and analysis, Rosenfeld, A. (ed.), Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 6–35.Google Scholar
  2. Burt, P.J., Adelson, E.H. (1983). The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code, IEEE Tr. on Comm., vol. COM-31, pp. 532–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burt, P.J., Hong, T.H., Rosenfeld, A. (1981). Segmentation and estimation of image region properties through cooperative hierarchical computation, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-11, pp. 802–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gauch, J.M., Oliver, W.R., Pizer, S.M. (1987). Multiresolution shape descriptions and their applications in medical imaging. In: Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Proc. of the 10th Conference, Graaf, C.N. de and Viergever, M.A. (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 131–149.Google Scholar
  5. Haralick, R.M., Lin, C., Lee, J.S.C., Zhuang, X. (1987). Multiresolution morphology. In: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Computer Vision, IEEE Computer Soc. Press, New York, pp. 516–520.Google Scholar
  6. Hong, T.H., Narayanan, K.A., Peleg, S., Rosenfeld, A., Silberberg, T. (1982). Image smoothing and segmentation by multiresolution pixel linking: further experiments and extension, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-12, pp. 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Koenderink, J.J., Doom, A.J. van (1979). The structure of two-dimensional scalar fields with applications to vision, Biol. Cybern., vol. 33, pp. 151–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Maragos, P.A. (1987). Tutorial on advances in morphological image processing and analysis, Optical Eng., vol. 26, pp. 623–632.Google Scholar
  9. Maragos, P.A., Schafer, R.W. (1986). Morphological skeleton representation and coding of binary images, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-34, pp. 1228–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Matheron, G. (1975). Random sets and integral geometry, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Pizer, S.M., Koenderink, J.J., Lifshitz, L.M., Helmink, L., Kaasjager, A.D.J. (1985). An image description for object definition, based on extremal regions in the stack. In: Information processing in Medical Imaging, Proc. of the 9th Conference, Bacharach, S.L. (ed.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 24–37.Google Scholar
  12. Serra, J. (1982). Image analysis and mathematical morphology, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Serra, J. (1988). Alternating sequential filters. In: Image analysis and mathematical morphology, vol. II: Advances in Mathematical Morphology, Serra, J. (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 203–216.Google Scholar
  14. Sternberg, S.R. (1986). Grayscale morphology, Comp. Vis. Graph. and Im. Proc., vol. 35, pp. 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Ying-Lie
    • 1
  • Alexander Toet
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Perception TNOUniversity Hospital UtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations