Skip to main content

Surface Geochemical Studies in the Norwegian Barents Sea: Comparison with Drilling Results

  • Conference paper
Generation, Accumulation and Production of Europe’s Hydrocarbons III

Abstract

During the last 4 years, a number of surface geochemical studies have been undertaken in the Barents Sea. Acreage in all of the areas has subsequently been licensed for exploration. Sampling for surface geochemistry has been undertaken using a gravity corer, where samples were taken 2 m below the seafloor. The sampling grids were either regular or irregular based on known geological features in the areas, or a combination of the two. The samples were analyzed for interstitial gas, adsorbed gas, grain-size distribution, organic and inorganic carbon content, fluorescence of the hexane extract and heavy hydrocarbons in the hexane extract. The results from the different areas ranged from barren, i.e. no indication of petrogenic hydrocarbons at the surface; anomalies of petrogenic hydrocarbons, i.e. indicating the generation of gas, condensate or oil; to extremely strong anomalies of oil interpreted as indicators of direct leakage from source rocks or a defective caprock.

In the meantime a number of wells have been drilled over the surveyed areas, where the results vary from dry to oil/gas shows and to residual oil shows. Detailed results from the surveys are discussed and compared with the drilling results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beghtel F W, Hitzman D O, Sundberg K R (1987) Microbial oil survey technique (MOST) evaluation of new field wildcat wells in Kansas. Assoc Pet Geochem Explor Bull 3: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund L T, Augustson J, Faerseth R (1986) The evolution of the Hammerfest Basin. In: Spencer AM et al. (eds) Habitat of hydrocarbons on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Graham and Trotman, London, pp 319–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard B B, Brooks J M, Sackett W M (1977) Natural gas seepage in the Gulf of Mexico. Earth Planet Sci Lett 32: 48–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks J M, Kennicutt II M C, Fay R R, MacDonald T J, Sassen R (1984) Thermogenic gas hydrates in the Gulf of Mexico. Science 225: 409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks J M, Cox H B, Kennicutt II M C, Pflaum R C (1987) Association of oil seepage and gas hydrates in the Gulf of Mexico. Org Geochem 10: 221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cline J D, Holmes M L, (1977) Submarine seepage of natural gas in Norton Sound, Alaska. Science 198: 1149–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan T J, Forgey R L, Roberts A A (1979) Aeromagnetic detection of diagenetic magnetite over oil fields. AAPG Bull 63: 246–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan T J, O’Brien D P, Bryan J G, Cunningham KI (1986) Near- surface magnetic indicators of buried hydrocarbons: aeromagnetic detection and separation of spurious signals. Assoc Pet Geochem Explor Bull 2: 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchscherer Jr W (1981) Carbonates and isotope ratios from surface rocks: a geochemical guide to underlying petroleum accumulations. In: Gottlieb B M (ed) Unconventional methods in exploration for petroleum and natural gas II. SMU Dallas, pp 201–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchscherer Jr W (1988) Organic carbon contamination and the delta carbon method of geochemical hydrocarbon prospecting. Assoc Pet Geochem Explor Bull 4: 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmel R H, Bjoroy M, van Grass G (1985) Geochemical exploration on the Norwegian Continental Shelf by analysis of shallow cores. In: Thomas B M et al. (eds) Geochemistry in exploration of the Norwegian Shelf. Graham and Trotman, London, pp 239–246

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Faber E, Stahl W (1983) Analytical procedure and results of an isotope geochemical surface survey in an area of the British North Sea. In: Brooks J (ed) Petroleum geochemistry and exploration of Europe. Geol Soc Spec Publ 12. Blackwell Oxford, pp 51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber E, Stahl W (1984) Geochemical surface exploration on hydrocarbons in the North Sea. AAPG Bull 68: 363–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J (1985) The genesis of radiometric anomalies above petroleum accumulations. Assoc Pet Geochem Explor Bull 1; 99: 27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote R S (1987) Correlations of borehole rock magnetic properties with oil and gas producting areas. Assoc Pet Geochem Explor Bull 3: 114–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevirtz J L, Carey B D, Blanco S R (1983) Surface geochemical exploration in the North Sea. In: Brooks J (ed) Petroleum geo-chemistry and exploration of Europe. Geological Society Spec Publ 12. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevirtz J L, Carey B D, Blanco S R (1985) Regional geochemical analysis of the southern portion of the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. In: Thomas BM et al. (eds) Petroleum geochemistry in exploration of the Norwegian Shelf. Graham & Trotman, London, pp 247–261

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harland W B, Dowdeswell E K (1988) Geological evolution of the Barents Shelf region. Graham and Trotman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz L (1939) On geochemical prospecting. Geophysics 4: 210–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland M, Judd A G (1988) Seabed pockmarks and seepages. Impact on geology, biology and the marine environment. Graham & Trotman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland M, Talbot M R, Quale H, Olaussen S, Aasberg L (1987) Methane-related carbonate cements in pockmarks of the North Sea. J Sediment Petrol 57: 881–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones V T, Drozd R J (1983) Predictions of oil or gas potential by near- surface geochemistry. AAPG Bull 67: 932–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennicutt II M C, Brooks J M (1988) Relation between shallow sediment bitumen and deeper reservoired hydrocarbons, offshore Santa Maria Basin, California, USA. Appl Geochem 3: 573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennicutt II M C, Sericano J, Wade T L, Alcazar F, Brooks J M (1987a) High-molecular weight hydrocarbons in Gulf of Mexico continental slope sediments. Deep-Sea Res 34 (3): 403–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennicutt II M C, Denoux G J, Brooks J M, Sandberg W A (1987b) Hydrocarbons in Mississippi fan and intraslope basin sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 51: 1457–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennicutt II M C, Brooks J M, Burke Jr R A (1989) Hydrocarbon seepage, gas hydrates, and authigenic carbonate in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. OTC 5952, 21st Annu Offshore Technology Conf, pp 649–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausman R W, Voorhees K J, (1983) A new development in petroleum exploration technology. Mines Mag 73: 6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvenvolden D A, Vogel T M, Gardner J V (1981) Geochemical prospecting for hydrocarbons in the outer continental Shelf, South Bering Sea, Alaska. J Geochem Explor 14: 209–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubmeyer G (1933) A new geophysical prospecting method, especially for deposits of hydrocarbons. Petroleum (Lond) V (29): 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Price L C (1985) A critical overview of and proposed working for hydrocarbon microseepage. US Geol Survey Open-File Rep pp 85–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts H H, Sassen R, Aharon P (1988) Petroleum derived auth-igenic carbonates of the Louisiana continental slope. Proc Oceans ’88 Conf, pp 101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts H H, Carney R, Aharon P (1989) Carbonate buildups on the continental slope off Lousiana. Proc Offshore Technol Conf 5953, pp 655–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock B N (1984) Geobotanical remote sensing — a case study of plant/soil interaction: 187th American Chemical Society Natl Meet, St. Louis, MO, April 8–14th

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom M W, Meridith D, Kaplan I R (1983) Hydrocarbon geochemistry in surface sediments of Alaskan outer Continental Shelf, Part 2. Distribution of hydrocarbon gases. AAPG Bull 67: 2047–2052

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiener E J, Stober G, Faber E (1985) Surface geochemical ex-ploration for hydrocarbons in offshore area—principles, methods and results. In: Thomas B M et al. (eds) Petroleum geochemistry in exploration of the Norwegian Shelf. Graham & Trotman, London, pp 223–238

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov V A (1933) The gas survey as a method of prospecting for oil and gas formations. Technika, NGRI No. 1 (Feb)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedesco S A (1988) The use of radiometrics with soil gas geochemistry to define and delineate Hoing Sandstone reservoirs in the western Illinois Basin. Assoc Pet Geochem Explor Bull 4: 1–17

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bjøroy, M., Løberg, R. (1993). Surface Geochemical Studies in the Norwegian Barents Sea: Comparison with Drilling Results. In: Spencer, A.M. (eds) Generation, Accumulation and Production of Europe’s Hydrocarbons III. Special Publication of the European Association of Petroleum Geoscientists, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77859-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77859-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77861-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77859-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics