Interactivity and Intelligent Advisory Strategies in a Multimedia Learning Environment: Human Factors, Design Issues and Technical Considerations

  • Max Giardina
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 93)


Multimedia environments offer us a new perception of the state of changes in and the integration of technological environments which can increase our ability to process information in the field of education. Moreover, they are compelling us to change our idea of knowledge. This change is reflected in the obvious convergence of different types of access, communication and information exchanges. A number of related fields such as publishing, television, the mass media in general and the nascent data processing sector are overlapping more and more, altering each others’ characteristics, and spawning hybrid environments which make it possible to obtain information in new ways.


Educational Technology Interactive Environment Technological Environment Learning Situation Interactive Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.R., et al.: Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors. Proceeding of the Sixth Cognitive Science Society. Boulder, Colorado, 1984Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.R., and Reiser, B.j.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Science, Vol. 228, No. 4698, pp. 456–462 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arnold, J.R., Boyle, C.R., Farrell, R., and Reiser, B.j.: Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors. P. Morris (ed.). Modelling Cognition, Wiley, 1986Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnold, R.C.: Indicom project evaluation of CAI mathematic achievement. Pontiac, Ohio, 1970Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baker, D.: New techniques and approaches to integrating multi-media information in a videodisc program. Conference Proceedings, 1985, Videodisc, UPMCAL DISC and CD-ROM Conference and Exposition, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barker, P.: The many faces of human-machine interaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 74–80 (1986a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barker, P.: Multimedia Cal. computer education. British Journal of Education Technology, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 20–33 (1986b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barker, P.: A practical introduction to authoring for computer-assisted instruction. Part 8: Multi-media CAI. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 35–39 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bennion, J.: Authoring interactive video courseware. De Bloois (ed.). Videodisc/microcomputer Courseware Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Press, 1982Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bennion, J.: Student learning strategies on the TICCIT CAI system at BYU. Dissertation Abstract International Computer Sciences, Vol. 39/08-B, pp. 3919, (1978)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bitter, G.G.: Effect of computer applications on achievement in college introductory calculus course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, 1970Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bitzer, M.D., and Bitzer, D.L.: Teaching nursing by computer: an evaluative study. Computer in Biology and Medicine, Vol. 3, No.3, pp. 187–204 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bolt, R.A.: Spatial Data Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1979Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bolt, R.A.: The human interface: where people and computers meet. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications, 1984Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonner, J.: Computer Courseware: Frame-based or intelligent? Educational Technology, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 30–33. March 1987Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bork, A. et al.: Conference on intelligent videodisc systems. Brief Informal Summary. Irvine: University of California, 14 pp. December 1977Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bork, A. et al.: Computers and the future: education. Computer Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1–9 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bork, A. et al.: Interactive learning. American Journal of Physics, Vol. 47, pp. 5–10 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bork, A. et al.: Learning with computers. Bedford, MA: Digital Press. 1981Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bork, A. et al.: Personal Computers for Education. New York: Harper and Row. 1985Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bork, A. et al.: Physics in the Irvine Educational Technology Center. Computers and Education, Vol. 4, pp. 37–57 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bork, A. et al.: Visions: future for learning and technology. Education Technology Center Information and Computer Science. Irvine: University of California. September 1986Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burton, R.R., and Brown, J.S.: An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. D.Sleeman & Brown. New York: Academic Press, pp. 51–78 (1982)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burton, R.R., and Brown, J.S.: An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. INT-JRNL of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 11, pp. 5–24 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Charp, S.: Effectiveness of computers in instruction: viewpoints. Teaching and Learning, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 28–32 (1981)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clark, R.: The role of the videodisc in education and training. Media in Education and Development, pp. 190–192 (1984)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clément, F.: Affective considerations in computer-based education. Educational Technology, Vol. 21 No. 19, pp. 190–192 (1984)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cohen, V.B.: A reexamination of feedback in computer-based instruction: implications for instructional design. Educational Technology, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 33–37 (1985)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cohen, V.B.: Interactive features in the design of videodisc material. Educational Technology, Vol. 24, No. 1. (1984)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Collins, A.: Process in acquiring knowledge. In Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. (Anderson, R.C., Spiro, R.J., and Montague, W.E. eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1977Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Collins, A.: Component models of physical systems. Proceedings of the 7th Cognitive Society Conference. Irvine, CA, pp. 80–89 (1985)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Collins, A., and Stevens, A.I.: Goals and strategies of inquiry teachers. In Advances in Instructional Psychology.(Glaser, R. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Vol. 2 (1982)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Collins, A., and Brown, J.S.: The new apprenticeship: teaching students the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In Cognition and Instruction: Issues and Agendas. (Resnick, L.B. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1986Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Collins, A., and Brown, J.S.: The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. (Mandl, H. and Lesgold, A.M. eds.). New York: Springer-Verlag 1988Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Currier, R.L.: Interactive videodisc learning systems: A new tool for educational create visual lesson. High Technology, Vol. 3, No. 11, pp. 51–59 (1983)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Daynes, R. and Holder, S.: Controlling videodiscs with Micros. Bytem 1984Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Daynes, R.: Experimenting with videodisc. Instructional Innovator, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 24–25 (1982)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    De Bloois, M.: Videodisc/Micro-Computer Courseware Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications 1982Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Depover, C.: L’ordinateur média d’enseignement: un cadre conceptuel. Brussels: De Boeck-Wesmael 1987Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Depover, C.: Un cadre conceptuel pour un enseignement adaptif médiatisé par ordinateur. Mise au point de deux dispositifs d’évaluation formative extemporanée. Doctoral thesis, Faculté de psycho-pédagogie, Université de Mons, Belgium 1985Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dubreil, B.: Le vidéodisque pédagogique. Sonsvision, pp. 35–37 (1983)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Duchastel, P.: Design principle for intelligent systems in training. Université Laval: LIAE, Faculté des Sciences de l’éducation 1988Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Eastwood, L.: Motivations and deterrents to educational use of “intelligent videodisc systems”. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 303–305 (1978)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    England, G.E.: A study of computer-assisted budgeting among the developmentally handicapped. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary 1979Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Faiola, T., and De Bloois, M.: Designing a visual factor-based screen display interface: The new role of graphist technology. Educational Technology, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 12–20. August 1988Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Farrel, R., et al.: Interactive student modelling in a computer-based Lisp Tutor. Proceedings of the Sixth Cognitive Science Society Conference. Boulder, Colorado, pp. 152–155 (1984)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fletcher, J., and Atkinson, R.: Evaluation of the Stanford CAI programs in initial reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 63, pp. 507–602 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fletcher, J.: Intelligent instructional systems in training. In Application in Artificial Intelligence. (Andriole, J.J. ed.). Princeton, NJ: Petroncelli Books, 1985Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fowler, B.: The effectiveness of computer-controlled videodisc-based training. Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 42/01-A, p.60 (1980)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Frizot, D.: Future shock of today’s education. Introduction of a computer in a French secondary school. In Microcomputer in Secondary Education. (Tagg, E.D. ed). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company 1980Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gagné, R.M., and Dick, W.: Instructional psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 34, pp. 261–295 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gayesky, D.M.: Interactive video: integrating design “levels” and hardware “levels”. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 145–151 (1985)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gendele, J.F., and Gendele, J.G.: Interactive videodisc and its implications in education. Technological Horizons in Education, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 33–37 (1984)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Giardina, M. and Marton, Ph.: Références bibliographiques sur l’apprentissage interactif par vidéodisque et ordinateur. Université Laval: Département de technologie de l’enseignement 1987Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Giardina, M.; Duchastel, P., and Marton, Ph.: Vidéodisque et EIAO: une technologie en émergence. COGNITIVA 1987, Paris, La Villete. May 18–22 1987Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Goetzfried, L., and Hannafin, M.J.: The effects of embedded CAI instructional control strategies on the learning and application of mathematics rules. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 273–278 (1985)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gross, D., and Griffin, N.: Implementation and evaluation of a computer-assisted course in musical aural skills. AEDS Journal Spring, pp. 143–150 (1982)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hannafin, MJ., and Phillips, T.: Perspectives in the design of interactive video: Beyond tape versus disc. Journal of Research and Development in Education, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 44–60 (1988)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hannafin, M.J.: Empirical issues in the study of computer assisted interactive video. Educational communication and technology: A journal of theory, research and development. 33(4), pp. 235–247. Winter 1987Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hart, A.: Interactive video. Media in education and development, pp. 207–208. December 1984Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hassel, J.: An annotated bibliography summarizing and analyzing recorded research on the topic of computer assisted instruction and its effects on reading comprehension. Exit Project, Indiana University at South Bend, 1987Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hawkings, C.A.: The performance and promise of evaluation in computer-based learning. Computer and Education, Vol. 13, pp. 273–280 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hon, D.: Parameters for the design of interactive programs. In CD-I and Interactive Technology (Lambert, S. and Sallist, J. eds.). Indianapolis: Howard W. Sams and Company 1987Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hoisie, P.: Adopting interactive videodisc technology for education. Educational Technology, 27(7), Uly, pp. 5–10 (1987)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Johansen, K.J., and Tennyson, R.D.: Effect of adaptive advisement on perception in learner controlled, computer-based instruction use a rule-learning task. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 226–236 (1983)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Johnson, W., and Soloway, E.: Proust: Knowledge-based program debugging. Proceedings of the 7th International Software Engineering Conference. Orlando, Florida, pp. 369–380 (1985)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kulik, C.C., et al.: Computer-based instruction: what 200 evaluations say. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Atlanta. February 26-March 1, 1987Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kulik, J.: Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 19–26 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kulik, J.A., et al.: Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Computer in Human Behavior, Vol. 1, pp. 59–74 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kulik, J.L., Kulik, C.C., and Bangert-Drowns, R.L.: Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Computer in Human Behavior, Vol. 1, pp. 59–74 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lelu, A.: L’interactivité. Science et vie, les choc des média, No. 152, pp. 106–111 (1985)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Levin, W.: Interactive video: the state of the art teaching machine. The Computing Teacher, pp. 11–17 (1983)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Lippman, A.: Imaging and Interactivity. Proceedings of the 15th Joint Conference on Image Technology, pp. 17–19 (1984)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Marinick and Gerlach, S.: Designing interactive, responsive instruction: A set of procedures. Educational Technology, Vol. 26, No. 11. November 1986Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Martin, J.B.: A practical voice input system. In Computers and Communications: Implications for Education. (Seidel, R.J., and Rubin, M.C. eds.). New York: Academic Press 1975Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Marton, Ph.: La programmation télévisuelle: une première évaluation de l’application dans l’enseignement. Didasco, Vol. 1. Quebec. Fall 1983Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Marton, Ph.: Bilan des recherches sur l’apprentissage interactif (1983–1989). Groupe de recherche sur l’apprentissage interactif (GRAIN). Université Laval: Département de Technologie de l’enseignement 1989Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Martorella, P.: Interactive video systems in the classroom. Social Education, Vol. 97, No. 5, pp. 325–327 (1982)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    McEwing, R.A., and Roth, G.: Individualized learning with computer-based instruction. Educational Technology, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 30–32 (1985)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Merrill, M.D.: Learner control in CBL. Computers in Education, Vol. 4, pp. 77–95 (1980)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Merrill, M.D.: Component display theory, in Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview. (Reigeluth, C. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1983Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Merrill, M.D.: What is learner control? In Instructional Development: The State of the Art, II. (Bass, R.K., and Dills, C.R. eds.). Dubugue, IA: Kendall/Hunt 1984Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Merrill, M.D.: Where is the authoring in authoring systems? Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 90–96 (1985)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Merrill, M.D.: Prescriptions for an authoring system? Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, Vol. 14, No. 1 (1987)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Merrill, M.D.: The role of tutorial and experiential models in intelligent tutoring systems. Educational Technology, Vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 7–13. July 1988MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Merrill, M.D.: Schneider, E.W., and Fletcher, K.A.: “TICCIT.” Instructional Design Library, Vol. 40. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications 1980Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Merrill, M.D.: Schneider, E.W., and Fletcher, K.A.: “TICCIT.” Instructional Design Library, Vol. 40. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications 1983Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Merrill, P.F., and Bennion, J.: Videodisc technology in education: The current scene. NSPI Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 18–26. November 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Merrill, P.F.: Education and training applications of videodisc technology. In Videodiscs: The Technology, the Applications and the Future. (Siegel, E., Schubin, M., and Merrill, P.F. eds.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 69–101 (1981)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Meyer, R.: Borrow this new military technology and help win the war for kids’ minds. American School Board Journal, Vol. 71, No. 6, pp. 23–28 (1984)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Negroponte, N.: The Architecture Machine. Cambridge, MA: MTT Press 1972Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Pagliaro, L.A.: CAI in pharmacology: student academic performance and instructional interactions. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 131–144 (1983)Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Papert, S., Mindstorms, children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books 1980Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Park, O., and Tennyson, R.D.: Computer-based instructional systems for adaptive education: A review. Contemporary Education Review, Vol. 2, pp. 121–135 (1983)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Priestman, T.: Interactive video and its applications. Media in Education and Development, pp. 182–186. December 1984Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Reiser, R.A.: Reducing student procrastination in a personalized system of instruction course. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 41–49 (1984)Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Ross, S.M., et al. Matching the lesson to the student: Alternative adaptive design for individualized learning systems. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 41–49 (1984Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Russel, A.: From videotape to videodisc: From passive to active instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 61, No. 10, pp. 866–868 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Sandals, L.H.: Computer-assisted learning with the developmentally handicapped. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary 1973Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Schneider, E.W.: Application of videodisc technology to individualized instruction. In Computers and Communication: Implications for Education (Seidel, R.J., ed.). New York: Academic Press 1975Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Screen Digest., p. 38. February 1986Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Self, J.: Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. In Proceedings of ITS-88. Montreal: PUM, pp. 18–24 (1988)Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Siegel, E., Schubien, M., and Merrill, P.F.: Videodiscs: The Technology, the Applications and the Future. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1981Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Stevens, S.M.: Surrogate laboratory experiments: interactive computer/videodisc lessons and their effects on students’ understanding of science. Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 45/09-A, p. 2827 (1984)Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Strain, A.R.: Computer-assisted instruction in social arithmetic for the retarded. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Calgary 1974Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Streibel, M.J.: Dialog design and instructional systems design for an intelligent videodisc system. Videodisc and Optical Disk, Vol. 4, No. 3. June 1984Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Streibel, M.J.: How to design an intelligent videodisc system: visual principles and dialog-design. Paper presented at the International Visual Literacy Conference. Lexington, Kentucky. November 2 1981Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Suppes, P., and Morningstar, M.: Computer-Assisted Instruction at Stanford, 1966–68: Data, Models and Evaluation of the Arithmetic Programs. New York: Academic Press 1972Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Tarrant, N., Nelly, L., and Wakley, J.: Project Management Guidelines to Instructional Interactive Videodisc Production. Educational Technology, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 7–18. January 1988Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Tennyson, R.D., and Bultrey, T.: Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 169–176 (1980)Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Tennyson, R.D.: Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, pp. 525–532 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Tennyson, R.D.: Use of adaptive information for advisement in learning concepts and rules using computer assisted instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 18, pp. 425–438 (1981)Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Tennyson, R.D., et al.: Artificial intelligence methods in computer-based instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 17–22 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Wenger, E.: Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers 1987Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Wiser, M.: The differentiation of heat and temperature: An evaluation of the effect of microcomputer teaching on students’ misconceptions. Technical Report. Washington: Office of Educational Research and Improvement 1986Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Young, J., and Tosti, D.: The Effectiveness of Interactive Videodisc in Training. U.S. Army Technical Report, Georgia. 1984Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max Giardina
    • 1
  1. 1.Université de Montréal Études et administrationCanada

Personalised recommendations