Skip to main content

Effect of ATG prophylaxis in sensitized and non-sensitized kidney graft recipients

  • Conference paper
  • 17 Accesses

Abstract

In our effort to find an optimum immunosuppressive protocol for kidney transplantation we introduced two forms of ATG prophylaxis: 1. high-dose single-bolus prophylaxis (9 mg/kg) in non-sensitized patients (PRA <5%); and 2. low-dose 8-day prophylaxis (1.5–3.0 mg/kg) in sensitized patients (PRA > 5%). A total of 204 kidney graft recipients were included in this study and treated with a triple-drug therapy (TDT). In comparison with TDT-treated controls, in sensitized patients the 8-day ATG prophylaxis resulted in a reduced rate of rejection episodes (25.5% vs 47%), an improved 1-year graft survival (82% vs 71%) and patient survival (94% vs 90%). In non-sensitized patients the high-dose single-bolus ATG prophylaxis induced a T-cell lymphopenia lasting 4 to 5 days and, in comparison with the corresponding controls, resulted in a shortened hospital stay (31.2 days vs 36.7 days), a reduced rate of rejection episodes (25.5% vs 53%), an improved 1-year graft survival (92% vs 86%) and patient survival (100% vs 94%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benvenisty AI, Cohen D, Stegall MD, Hardy MA (1990) Improved results using OKT3 as induction immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients with delayed graft function. Transplantation 49:321–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dendorfer U, Hillebrand G, Kasper C, Smely S, Weschka M, Hammer C, Racenberg J, Gurland H-J, Land W (1990) Effective prevention of interstitial rejection crises in immunological high risk patients following renal transplantation: Use of high doses of the new monoclonal antibody BMA 031. Transplant Proc 22: 1789–1790

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eichler C, Kaden J, Strobelt V, Oesterwitz H, Scholz D (1989) Cytomegalievirusnachweis mittels monoklonaler Antikorper an Aspirationsmaterial von Nierentransplantaten. Z Urol Nephrol 82:13–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fries D, Hiesse C, Charpentier B, Cantarovich M, Lantz O, Benoit G (1989) Optimal results in cadaveric renal transplantation with low-dose cyclosporine and steroids combined with prophylactic anti-lymphocyte globulin. Transplant Proc 20:23–25

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman MH, Regester RF, Freeman MB, Tyler B, Tyler JD (1991) Induction therapy with antilymphocyte serum (NATS) increases graft survival and function in kidneys with initial poor function. Transplant Proc 23:1753–1754

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grino JM, Bas J, Gonzalez C, Castelav AM, Seron D, Mestre M, Buendia E, Sabate R, Diaz C, Alsina J (1990) Low incidence of rejection and in vitro donor-specific hyporesponsiveness using pretransplant ALG, low-dose cyclosporine and steroids in kidney cadaveric transplantation. Transplant Proc 22:1376–1368

    Google Scholar 

  7. Groth J, Leverenz S, Koall W, Schmitt E, Kaden J, Schirrow R, Matzanke G, Strobelt V, Barz D, May G, Scholz D (1987) EinfluB immunologischer Faktoren auf die Frtihfunktion nach Nieren-transplantation. Z Klin Med 42:2249–2252

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grundmann R, Hesse U, Wienand P, Baldamus C, Arns W (1987) Graft survival and long-term renal function after sequential conventional cyclosporin A therapy in cadaver kidney transplantation- a prospective randomized trial. Klin Wochenschr 65: 879–884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hammond Eh, Wittwer CT, Greenwood J, Knape WA, Yowell RL, Menlove RL, Craven C, Renlund DG, Bristow MR, DeWitt CW, O&#x2019;Connell JB (1990) Relationship of OKT3 sensitization and vascular rejection in cardiac transplant patients receiving OKT3 rejection prophylaxis. Transplantation 50:776–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Illner W-D, Schleibner S, Abendroth D, Land W (1988) Quadruple-drug induction therapy in highly sensitized patients. Transplant Proc 20 [Suppl 1]: 410–411

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jondal M, Holm G, Wigzell H (1972) Surface markers on human B and T lymphocytes. I. A large population of lymphocytes forming non-immune rosettes with sheep red blood cells. J Exp Med 136:207–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaden J, Groth J (1983) Zur Dynamik und diagnostischen Wer-tigkeit der T-Lymphozytenzahl bei Patienten nach Nierentrans-plantation. Dtsch Gesundh.-wesen 38:342–347

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaden J, Strobelt V, Oesterwitz H, Groth J, May G, Eichler C (1987) Monitoring of renal allograft rejection with fine needle aspiration biopsy and serum C-reactive protein determinations. Transplant Proc 19:1657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kormos RL, Armitage JM, Dummer JS, Miyamoto Y, Griffith BP, Hardesty R (1990) Optimal perioperative immunosuppression in cardiac transplantation using rabbit antilymphocyte globulin. Transplantation 49:306–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Land W, Hillebrand G, Illner W-D, Abendroth D, Hancke E, Schleibner S, Hammer C, Racenberg J (1988) First clinical experience with a new TCR/CD3-monoclonal antibody (BMY 031) in kidney transplant patients. Transplant Int 1:116–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Light JA, Khawand N, Ali A, Brems W, Aquino A (1989) Comparison of Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin and OKT3 for induction of immunosuppression in renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc 21:1738–1740

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matas AJ, Tellis VA, Quinn TA, Glicklich D, Soberman R, Veith FJ (1988) Individualization of immediate posttransplant immunosuppression. Transplantation 45:406–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas F, Cunningham P, Sash C, Gross U, Thomas J (1988) Superior cadaver renal transplantation survival and increased cost-effectiveness using individualized quadruple immunosuppression. Transplant Proc 20 [Suppl 1]: 412–414

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weimar W, Baumgartner D, Hendriks GFJ, Hesse CJ, Balk AHHM, Simoons ML, Bos E (1988) The prophylactic use of or-thoclone OKT3 in kidney and heart transplantation. Transplant Proc 20 [Suppl 6]: 96–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wonigkeit K, Nashan B, Schwinzer R, Schlitt HJ, Kurrle R, Racenberg J, Seiler Fr, Ringe B, Pichlmayr R (1989) Use of a monoclonal antibody against the T cell receptor for prophylactic immunosuppressive treatment after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 21:2258–2259

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

May, G. et al. (1992). Effect of ATG prophylaxis in sensitized and non-sensitized kidney graft recipients. In: Kootstra, G., Opelz, G., Buurman, W.A., van Hooff, J.P., MacMaster, P., Wallwork, J. (eds) Transplant International Official Journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77423-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77423-2_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55342-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77423-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics