Symmetries in Physics pp 176-184 | Cite as

# The Relativistic Oscillator and Mass Formulas

## Abstract

The mass spectrum of hadrons is as important a problem in relativistic physics as the energy spectrum of molecules and nuclei was in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. In molecular physics the spectrum is explained in terms of single particle excitations and collective rotations and vibrations [1]. In nuclear physics the “parts” of the collective model are also rotations and vibrations [2], with the main difference between molecular and nuclear collective motions being that in molecular physics the rotational and vibrational mode are well separated from each other and from the particle excitations and in nuclear physics these “parts” are not well separated from each other and rotation-vibration particle interactions play an important role. Hadrons are relativistic extended objects and if the analogy between molecular and nuclear physics persists also for the relativistic domain we would expect the collective mode of hadrons to be relativistic rotators and relativistic oscillators.

## Keywords

Flux Tube Mass Formula Extended Object Vibrational Quantum Number Single Particle Excitation## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [1]G. Herzberg,
*Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure*(D. van Nos-trand Publishers, 1966).Google Scholar - [2]A. Bohr and B. Mottelson,
*Nuclear Structure*(Benjamin, 1969) Vol. II.Google Scholar - [3]
- [4]T. Takabayashi,
*Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.***67**, 1 (1979) and references therein.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - [5]See also Y.S. Kim and E. Noz,
*Theory and Applications of the Poincaré group*(Reidel Publishing, 1986) for additional references.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [6]
- [6a]M. Moshinsky, G. Loyola, A. Szczepaniak, C. Villegas, and N. Aquino,
*Proceedings of the Rio de Janeiro International Workshop*(World Scientific, 1990), p. 271Google Scholar - [6b]M. Moshinsky, G. Loyola and A. Szczepaniak,
*Anniversary Volume for J.J. Giambiaggi*(World Scientific, 1990).Google Scholar - [7]A. Bohm, M. Loewe, P. Magnollay, M. Tarlini, R.R. Aldinger, L.C. Biedenharn, and H. van Dam,
*Phys. Rev. D***31**, 2304 (1985)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [7a]
- [7c]
- [7c]
- [8]V.I. Borodulin, G.P. Pron’ko, A.V. Razumov, L.D. Soloviev, and O.L. Zorin,
*Proceedings of the International Conference on High Energy Physics*(Bari, Italy, July 1985); G.P. Pron’ko,*Quantum Theory of String in the Four-Dimensional Space-Time*(Serpukhov Preprint 86–42); M.S. Plyushchay*et al., Light Meson Spectroscopy*(Serpukhov Preprint 87–24).Google Scholar - [9]
- [9a]F. Rohrich, in
*Recent Developments in Particle and Field Theory*, W. Dittrich, editor (Vieweg Braunschweig, 1977)Google Scholar - [9b]M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,
*Superstrings*(Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar - [10]
- [10a]
- [10b]
- [10c]E. Angelopoulos, in
*Quantum Theory, Groups, Fields and Particles*, p. 101, Ed. by A.O. Barut (Reidel, 1983) and reference 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [11]The representations of
*SO*(3, 2) have also been disscussed by M. Moshinsky, see E. Chacón, P.O. Hess, and M. Moshinsky,*J. Math. Phys.***28**, 2223 (1987) and references therein.CrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar