Advertisement

Early Versus Delayed Aneurysm Surgery in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Clinical Grade Hunt-Hess III

  • K. Lukow
  • W. Köning
  • J. Menzel
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Neurosurgery book series (NEURO, volume 20)

Abstract

Timing of aneurysm surgery in patients in grade III (according to Hunt and Hess) is still being discussed controversially, even reviewing last year’s literature. The main argument for early surgery [1, 2, 5, 7, 10] is recurrent hemorrhage. Its frequency is reported ranging from 9% to 22% during the first 2 weeks. Opponents of early surgery [4, 8, 9] list difficult intraoperative conditions, which include brain edema and the risk of vasospasm. Other authors do not see any essential difference between the results of early or delayed surgery [3, 6, 11]. They decide upon timing according to circumstances [12].

Keywords

Intracranial Aneurysm Glasgow Outcome Scale Cerebral Vasospasm Aneurysm Surgery Neurosurgical Department 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams HP Jr, Kassell NF, Tomer JC et al. (1981) Early management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A report of the cooperative aneurysma study. J Neurosurg 54:141–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gilsbach JM, Reulen HJ, Ljunggren B, Brandt L, v Hoist H, Mokrey M, v Essen C, Conzen M (1990) Early aneurysm surgery and preventive therapy with intravenously administered nimodipine: a multicenter, double-blind, dose-comparison study. Neurosurgery 26:458–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kassel NF, Tomer JC, Jane JA, Haley EC Jr, Adams HP et al. (1990) The international cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 73:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ljunggren B, Sàveland H, Brandt L (1983) Causes of unfavorable outcome after early aneurysm operation. Neurosurgery 13:629–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Öhman J, Heiskanen O (1989) Timing of operation for ruptured supratentorial aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. J Neurosurg 70:55–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Samson DS, Hodosh RM, Reid WR et al. (1979) Risk of intracranial aneurysm surgery in the good grade patient: early versus late operation. Neurosurgery 5:422–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sano K, Saito I (1978) Timing and indication of surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms with regard to cerebral vasospasm. Acta Neurochir 41:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sundt TM (1977) Cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoidal hemorrhage: evolution, management, and relationship to timing of surgery. Clin Neurosurg 56:228–239Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sundt TM, Kobayashi S, Fode NC, Whisnant JP (1982) Results and complications of surgical management of 809 intracranial aneurysms in 722 cases. J Neurosurg 56:753–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suzuki J, Onuma T, Yoshimoto T (1979) Results of early operations on cerebral aneurysms. Surg Neurol 11:407–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weir B, Aronyk K (1981) Management mortality and the timing of surgery for supratentorial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 54:146–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yasargil MG (1984) Microneurosurgery II. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 10–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Lukow
  • W. Köning
  • J. Menzel
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurochirurgische Klinik der Städtischen Krankenanstalten Köln-MerheimKöln 91Germany

Personalised recommendations