Impairments of Attention in Brain-Damaged Patients

  • A. H. van Zomeren
  • L. Fasotti

Abstract

People who have sustained cerebral damage often complain of increased mental fatiguability, poor concentration, and an inability to divide their attention over two simultaneous tasks. These impairments seem related to a central concept of attention. However, it is difficult to describe the clinical phenomena in unequivocal terms. Attention is definitely not a clearcut function, as the word refers to several aspects of perceptual processes and motor responses. Moreover, the term also covers basic biological aspects of the central nervous system, such as its level of activation. This chapter is concerned with attention on task level, and hence with a psychological approach. In the next section, impairments in five aspects of attention will be discussed. The last section deals with attempts to ameliorate attentional impairments by cognitive rehabilitation.

Keywords

Radionuclide Assimilation Neurol Tate Encephalitis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert ML (1973) A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology (Minneap) 23: 658–664Google Scholar
  2. Barry P, Riley JM (1987) Adult norms for the Kaufman Hand Movement Test and a single-subject design for acute brain injury rehabilitation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 9: 449–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Yishay Y, Piasetsky EB, Rattock J (1987) A systematic method for ameliorating disorders in basic attention. In: Meyer MJ, Benton AL, Diller L (eds) Neuropsychological rehabilitation. Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackburn HL, Benton AL (1955) Simple and choice reaction time in cerebral disease. Confin Neurol 15: 327–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benton AL, Joynt RJ (1958) Reaction time in unilateral cerebral disease. Confin Neurol 19: 247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brouwer WH, Ponds RWHM, van Wolffelaar PC, van Zomeren AH (1989) Divided attention 5 to 10 years after closed head injury. Cortex 25: 219–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Caplan B (1987) Assessment of unilateral neglect: a new reading test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 9: 359–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chadwick O, Rutter M, Brown G, Shaffer D, Traub M (1981) A prospective study of children with head injuries. II. Cognitive sequelae. Psychol Med 11: 49–61Google Scholar
  9. Dencker SJ, Löfving B (1958) A psychometric study of identical twins discordant for closed head injury. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand [Suppl 122] 33Google Scholar
  10. Diller L, Weinberg J (1977) Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation: the evolution of a rational remediation program. In: Weinstein EA, Friedland RP (eds) Advances in neurology vol 10. Raven, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstein K (1952) The effects of brain damage on personality. Psychiatry 15: 245–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray JM, Robertson I, Pentland B, Smith S (1992) Microcomputer-based attentional retraining after brain damage: a randomised group controlled trial. Neuropsych Rehabil (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Greber R, Perret E (1985) Attention and short-term memory disorders after brain stem lesions.Google Scholar
  14. EBBS Workshop, Zurich Gronwall D, Sampson H (1974) The psychological effects of concussion. Auckland University Press, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  15. Gross Y, Schutz LE (1986) Intervention models in neuropsychology. In: Uzzell BP, Gross Y (eds) Clinical neuropsychology of intervention. Nijhoff, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris JE, Sunderland A (1981) A brief survey of the management of memory disorders in rehabilitation units in Britain. Int Rehabil Med 3: 206–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E (1985) Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E (eds) Clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Hicks L, Birren JE (1970) Aging, brain damage and psychomotor slowing. Psychol Bull 74: 377–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoist P, Villki J (1988) Effect of frontalmedial lesions on performance on the Stroop test and word fluency tasks. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 10: 79–80Google Scholar
  20. Lezak MD (1982) The problems of assessing executive functions. Int J Psychol 17: 281–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lezak MD (1983) Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Lüria AR (1966) Higher cortical functions in man. Tavistock, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Malec J, Rao N, Jones R, Stubbs K (1984) Video game practice effects on sustained attention in patients with craniocerebral trauma. Cogn Rehabil 2: 18–23Google Scholar
  24. Miller E (1971) Simple and choice reaction time following severe head injury. Cortex 6: 121–127Google Scholar
  25. Miller E, Cruzat A (1981) A note on the effects of irrelevant information on task performance after mild and severe head injury. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 20: 69–70Google Scholar
  26. Norrman B, Svahn K (1961) A follow-up study of severe brain injuries. Acta Psychiatr Scand 37: 236–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Shaugnessy EJ, Fowler RS, Reid V (1984) Sequelae of mild closed head injuries. J Fam Pract 18: 391–394Google Scholar
  28. Perret E (1974) The left frontal lobe in man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behavior. Neuropsychologia 12: 323–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ponsford JL, Kinsella G (1988) Evaluation of a remedial programme for attentional deficits following closed head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 10: 693–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Powell GE (1981) Brain function therapy. Gower-Aldershot, HantsGoogle Scholar
  31. Rao SM, Bieliauskas LA (1983) Cognitive rehabilitation two-and- one-half years post right temporal lobectomy. J Clin Neuropsychol 5: 313–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robertson I, Gray JM, Pentland B, Waite LJ (1990) A randomised controlled trial of microcomputer-based rehabilitation for unilateral left visual neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71: 663–668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosvold HE, Mirsky AF, Sarason I, Bransome ED, Beck LH (1956) A Continuous Performance Test of brain damage. J Consult Psychol 20: 343–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shallice T (1982) Specific impairments of planning. In: Broadbent DE, Weiskrantz L (eds) The neuropsychology of cognitive function. Royal Society, London, pp 199–209Google Scholar
  35. Shiffrin RM, Schneider W (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing. II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev 84: 127–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sivak M, Schneider W (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing . II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev 84: 127–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sivak M, Hill CS, Henson DL, Butler BP, Silber SM, Olson PL (1984b) Improved driving performance following perceptual training in persons with brain damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 65: 163–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA (1987) Effectiveness of an attention training program. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 9: 117–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18: 643–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sturm W, Dahmen W, Hartje W, Willmes K (1983) Ergebnisse eines Trainingsprogramms zur Verbesserung der visuellen Auffassungsschnelligkeit und Konzentrationsfahigkeit bei Hirnge- schadigten. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 233: 9–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stuss DT, Ely P, Hugenholtz H, Richard MT, Larochelle S, Poirier CA, Bell I (1985) Subtle neuropsychological deficits in patients with good recovery after closed head injury. Neurosurgery 17: 41–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wade DT, Wood VA, Langton Hewer R (1988) Recovery of cognitive function soon after stroke: a study of visual neglect, attention span and verbal recall. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51: 10–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Webster JS, Scott RR (1983) The effects of self-instructional training on attentional deficits following head injury. Clin Neuropsychol 5: 69–74Google Scholar
  44. Wechsler D (1955) The measurement of adult intelligence. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Halligan P (1987) The development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68: 98–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wood RL (1987) Brain injury rehabilitation: a neurobehavioral approach. Croon Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Wood RL, Fussey I (1987) Computer-based cognitive retraining: a controlled study. Int Disabil Stud 9: 149–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Zomeren AH, Brouwer WH (1987) Head injury and concepts of attention. In: Levin HS, Grafman J, Eisenberg HM (eds) Neurobehavioral recovery from head injury. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Zomeren AH, Deelman BG (1978) Long-term recovery of visual reaction time after closed head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41: 452–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Zomeren AH, van den Burg W (1985) Residual complaints of patients two years after severe closed head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 48: 21–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Zomeren AH, Brouwer WH, Rothengatter JA, Snoek JW (1988) Fitness to drive a car after recovery from severe head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69: 90–96PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. H. van Zomeren
  • L. Fasotti

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations