Psychometric Evaluation of Neuropsychological Test Performances

  • K. Willmes


One characteristic of a developed scientific discipline is the availability of proper measurement models and instruments. Under this perspective, considerable progress has been made in psychology in general in the last three decades. Likewise, neuropsychology has to take up the challenge and has to incorporate these measurement models into its body of assessment procedures. Recent overviews are, however, still devoid of them (Lezak 1988).


Lexical Decision Psychometric Evaluation Latent Continuum Consonant Cluster Partial Credit Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berk RA (1980) Criterion-referenced measurement: the state of the art. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanken G (1988) Anmerkungen zur Methodologie der kognitiven Neurolinguistik. Neuro- linguistik 2: 127–147Google Scholar
  3. Borg I (ed) (1981) Multidimensional data representations: when & why? Mathesis, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  4. Canter D (ed) (1985) Facet theory: approaches to social research. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Caramazza A, McCloskey M (1988) The case for single-patient studies. Cogn Neuropsychol 5: 517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Bleser R, Denes GF, Luzzatti C, Mazzucchi A, Poeck K, Spinnler H, Willmes K (1986) UAachener Aphasie Test (AAT). I. Problemi e soluzioni per una versione italiana del test e per uno studio crosslinguistico dei disturbi afasici. Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr 47: 209–237Google Scholar
  7. Ellis AW, Young AW (1988) Human cognitive neuropsychology. Erlbaum HoveGoogle Scholar
  8. Hambleton RK (1978) On the use of cut-off scores with criterion referenced tests in instructional settings. J Educ Measure 15: 277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hambleton RK, Novick MR (1973) Toward an integration of theory and method for criterion-references tests. J Educ Measure 10: 159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland PW, Rubin DB (eds) (1982) Test equating. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Huber HP (1973) Psychometrische Einzelfalldiagnostik. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  12. Huber W, Poeck K, Willmes K (1984) The Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT). In: Rose FC (ed) Progress in aphasiology. Raven, New York, pp 291–303Google Scholar
  13. Huber W, Willmes K, Göddenhenrich S (1988) Diagnose von Leistungsdissoziationen beim lexika- lischen Diskriminieren. In: Günther KB (ed) Sprachstorungen. Schindele, Heidelberg, pp 306–329Google Scholar
  14. Klauer KJ (1987) Kriteriumsorientierte Tests. Hogrefe, Gattingen, FRGGoogle Scholar
  15. Lezak MD (1988) Neuropsychological test and assessment techniques. In: Boiler FC, Grafman J (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 47–68Google Scholar
  16. Lord FM, Novick MR (1968) Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  17. Luzzatti C, Willmes K, Bisiacchi P, De Bleser R, Faglia L, Mazzucchi A, Posteraro L, Thricco M (1987) L’ Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). II. Proprieta psichometriche della versione italiana. Arch Pscicol Neurol Psichiatr 48: 480–519Google Scholar
  18. Masters GN, Wright BD, Ludlow LH (1980) CREDIT item calibration and person management with ordered response categories. Computer program, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Nilipour R, Ashayeri H (1989) Alternating antagonism between two languages with successive recovery of a third in a bilingual aphasie patient. Brain Lang 36: 23–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Payne RW, Jones G (1957) Statistics for the investigation of individual cases. J Clin Psychol 13: 115–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Poeck K, Goddenhenrich S (1988) Standardized tests for the detection of dissociation in aphasie language performance. Aphasiology 2: 375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Price LC, Dayton CM, Macready GB (1980) Discovery algorithm for hierarchical relations. Psychometrika 45: 449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rasch G (1961) On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. Proceed 4th Berkeley Symp Math Statist Probab, pp 321–333Google Scholar
  24. Sergent J (1988) Some theoretical and methodological issues in neuropsychological research. In: Boiler FC, Grafman J (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 69–81Google Scholar
  25. Shallice T (1979) Case study approach in neuropsychological research. J Clin Neuropsychol 1: 183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tavare S, Altham PME (1983) Serial dependence of observations leading to contingency tables, and corrections to chi-squared statistics. Biometrika 70: 139–144Google Scholar
  27. Willmes K (1981) A new look at the Token Test using probabilistic test models. Neuropsychologia 19: 631–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Willmes K (1985) An approach to analyzing a single subject’s scores obtained in a standardized test with application to the Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 7: 331–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Willmes K, Ratajezak H (1987) The design and application of a data- and method base system for the Aachen Aphasia Test. Neuropsychologia 25: 725–733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Willmes K, Poeck K, Weniger D, Huber W (1983) Facet theory applied to the construction and validation of the Aachen Aphasia Test. Brain Lang 18: 259–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Willmes K, Luzzatti C, Mazzucchi A, De Bleser R, Colombo C, Bisiacchi P (1988) L’Aachener Aphasie Test. III. Procedimento diagnostico per casi singoli. Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr 49: 510–545Google Scholar
  32. Wright BD, Masters GN (1982) Rating scale analysis. Mesa, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Willmes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations