Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria and Their Role in Biocorrosion

  • W. Allan Hamilton

Abstract

Sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are the microorganisms most widely implicated in cases of biocorrosion arising in a wide range of natural and industrial environments. Models for their mechanism of action have concentrated on cathodic stimulation of the electrochemical process by hydrogen oxidation and/or the production of iron sulphide corrosion products. Preventatitive measures are largely confined to cathodic protection by sacrificial anode or impressed current, or the use of biocides in contained systems. Although SRB are strictly anaerobic organisms, they can be responsible for extensive biocorrosion under aerobic environmental conditions.

Over recent years two features characteristic of biocorrosion have become domi-nant in our effort to first understand and then control the processes involved.
  1. a)

    The physical and chemical nature of the iron sulphide corrosion products and in particular their interaction with oxygen, appear to determine the rate and extent of corrosion.

     
  2. b)

    SRB exist as components of complex microbial communities within a biofilm adherent to the metal surface. This biofilm is a dynamic structure composed of cells, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), and inorganic inclusions including corrosion products. Many biological and chemical processes become diffusion-limited, and within the biofilm the presence of microenvironments is of great significance to both microbial activities and the electrochemical reactions of corrosion.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hamilton WA (1985) Sulphate-reducing bacteria and anaerobic corrosion Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 39, 159–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tiller AK (1982) Aspects of microbial corrosion In: Parkins RN (ed) Corrosion processes. Applied Science Publishers, London; 115–159Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Widdel F (1988) Microbiology and ecology of sulfate-and sulfur-reducing bacteria In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. John Wiley, London; 469–585Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    von Wolzogen Kühr CAM, van der Vlught IS (1934) The graphitization of cast iron as an electrobiochemical process in anaerobic soils. Water 18, 147–165Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costello JA (1974) Cathodic depolarisation by sulphate-reducing bacteria. S. Afr. J. Sci. 70, 202–204Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pankhania IP, Mossavi AN, Hamilton WA (1986) Utilization of cathodic hydrogen by Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough). J. Gen. Microbiol. 132, 3357–3365Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hardy JA (1983) Utilization of cathodic hydrogen by sulphate-reducing bacteria. Br. Corros. J. 18, 190–193Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cord-Ruwisch R, Kleinitz W, Widdel F (1987) Sulfate-reducing bacteria and their activities in oil production. J. Pet. Tech. Jan, 97–106Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guezennec J, Therene M (1988) A study of the influence of cathodic protection on the growth of SRB and corrosion in marine sediments by electrochemical techniques In, Sequeira CAC, Tiller AK (eds) Microbial corrosion 1. Elsevier Applied Science, London; 256–265Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    King RA, Miller JDA (1981) Corrosion by the sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature 233, 491–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    King RA, Miller JDA, Wakerley DS (1973) Corrosion of mild steel in cultures of sulphate-reducing bacteria: Effect of changing the soluble iron concentrations during growth. Br. Corros. J. 8, 89–93Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mara DD, Williams DJA (1972) The mechanism of sulphide corrosion by sulpha-te-reducing bacteria In: Walters A M, Hueck-van der Plas E H (eds) Biodeterioration of materials. Vol 2. Applied Science Publishers, London; 103–113Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosser, HR, Hamilton WA (1983) Simple assay for accurate determination of [35S] sulfate reduction activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 1956–1959Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jorgensen BB (1988) Ecology of the sulphur cycle: oxidation pathways in sedi-ments. Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol. 42, 31–63Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hardy JA, Bown J (1984) The corrosion of mild steel by biogenic sulfide films exposed to air. Corrosion 40, 650–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Braithwaite WR, Lichti KA (1980) Surface corrosion of metals in geothermal fluids at Broadlands, New Zealand. In: Casper LA, Pinchback TR (eds) Geothermal scaling and corrosion. ASTM STP 717. Amer Soc Test Mat; 81–112Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maxwell S, Hamilton WA (1986) Modified assay for determining the sulfate reduction activity at metal surfaces. J. Microb. Methods 5, 83–91Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilderer PA, Characklis WG (1989) Structure and function of biofilms. In: Cha-racklis WG, Wilderer PA (eds) Structure and function of biofilms. John Wiley, Chichester; 5–17Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Videla HA (1989) Metal dissolution/redox in biofilms. In: Characklis WG, Wilde-rer PA (eds) Structure and function of biofilms. John Wiley, Chichester; 301–320Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Allan Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular and Cell BiologyMarischal College University of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations