Advertisement

Preoperative Grading of Visual Function by Pattern Evoked Electroretinogram and Visual Evoked Cortical Potentials in Patients with Sellar and Parasellar Tumors

  • R. G. Lorenz
  • W. Steudel
  • W. Heider
  • R. Lorenz
Conference paper

Abstract

One of the major effects on the health of patients with sellar or parasellar tumors is impairment of the visual system by direct or indirect damage to the optic nerve, chiasma, or optic tract. Despite successful surgical intervention many of these patients do not regain normal visual function. A persistent visual impairment is, as a rule, caused by an irreversible degeneration of nerve fibers with subsequent degeneration of retinal ganglion cells. Preoperative ophthalmological examinations in these patients are usually limited to determining visual acuity and visual fields and to the ophthalmoscopic inspection of the optic disc.

Keywords

Visual Acuity Pituitary Adenoma Retinal Ganglion Cell Visual Function Cortical Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arden GB, Carter RM, Hogg C, Siegel JM, Margolis S (1979) A gold-foil electrode extending the horizons for clinical electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18: 421–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Armington JC (1974) The electroretinogram. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Berninger T and Schuurmans RP (1985) Spatial tuning of the pattern ERG across temporal frequency. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 61: 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawson W, Maida T, Rubin R (1982) Human pattern evoked retinal responses are altered by optic atrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 22: 796–803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dodt E (1987) The electrical responses of the human eye to patterned stimuli: clinical observations. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 65: 271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Granit R (1962) The visual pathway. In: Davson M (ed) The eye. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Granit R (1963) Sensory mechanisms of the retina. Hafner, New York Groneberg A (1980) Simultaneously recorded retinal and cortical potentials elicited by checkerboard stimuli. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 23: 255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Groneberg A, Teping C (1980) Topodiagnostik von Sehstörungen durch Ableitung retinaler und kortikaler Antworten auf Umkehr-Kontrastmuster. Ber Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges 77: 409–415Google Scholar
  9. HallidayAM, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1972) Delayed visual evoked responses in optic neuritis. Lancet 1: 982–985Google Scholar
  10. HallidayAM, McDonald WI, MushinJ (1973) Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br Med J IV: 661–664Google Scholar
  11. Holder GE (1978) The effects of chiasmal compression on the pattern visual evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45: 278–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kupfer C (1963) Retinal ganglion cell degeneration following chiasmal lesions in man. Arch Ophthalmol 70: 256–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lorenz RG, Dodt E, Heider W (1989) Pattern electroretinogram peak time as a clinical means of discriminating retinal from optic nerve disease. Doc Ophthalmol 71: 307–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lorenz RG, NiepelG, Heider W (1988) Amplituden- und Latenzänderungen im Muster- Elektroretinogramm (M-ERG) bei Netzhaut- und Sehnervenerkrankungen. Fortschr Ophthalmol 85, 3: 296–300Google Scholar
  15. Maffei L, Fiorentini A (1981) Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science 211: 953–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Papst N, Bopp M, Schnaudigel OE (1984) The pattern evoked electroretinogram associated with elevated intraocular pressure. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 222: 34–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Riggs LA, Johnson EP, Schick AML (1964) Electrical responses of the human eye to moving stimulus pattern. Science 144: 567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Seiple W, Price IM, Kupersmith M, Siegel IM, Carr RE (1983) The pattern electroretinogram in optic nerve disease. Ophthalmology 90: 1127–1132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Teping C (1981) Visusbestimmung mit Hilfe des visuell evozierten kortikalen Potentials. KlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Monatsbl Augenheilkd 179:169Google Scholar
  21. van Lith GHM (1980) Application of electroophthalmology. In: MichaelsonIC (ed) Textbook of the fundus of the eye. Churchill Livingstone, New York, p. 667Google Scholar
  22. Wanger P, Persson HE (1983) Pattern-reversal electroretinograms in unilateral glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24: 749–753PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zrenner E, Baker CL, Hess RF, Olsen BT (1986) Current source density analysis of linear and non-linear components of the primate electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci [Suppl] 242: 82Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. G. Lorenz
    • 1
  • W. Steudel
    • 1
  • W. Heider
    • 1
  • R. Lorenz
    • 1
  1. 1.Frankfurt/M.Germany

Personalised recommendations