Rockwool as a Substrate for Greenhouse Crops

Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 17)


In the Scandinavian countries, the first crops were grown on rockwool in the beginning of the 1970’s. From 1975, rockwool was used by Dutch growers, and soon a growing system was developed for fruit vegetable crops, like tomato, cucumber, sweet pepper, and eggplant. Later, systems were developed also for cut flowers, like gerbera, rose, and carnation. In the meantime systems came into being for plant propagation, rooting of cuttings, and growing of container plants. For these purposes, propagating cubes, plugs, and granulated rockwool were produced.


Nutrient Solution Drainage Water Phosphate Content Sweet Pepper Water Retention Capacity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams P (1987) The test of raised salinity. Grower 107; 2:(supplement) 23–27Google Scholar
  2. Barker AV, Mills HA (1980) Ammonium and nitrate nutrition of horticultural crops. Hortic Rev v2: 395–423Google Scholar
  3. Bennett AC (1974) Toxic effects of aqueous ammonia, copper, zinc, lead, boron and manganese on root growth. In: Carson EW (ed) The plant root and its environment. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, pp 669–683Google Scholar
  4. Broer S, Sonneveld C (1973) Mangaanvergiftiging bij roos. Vakbl Bloemisterij 28; 48: 10–11Google Scholar
  5. Chong PC, Ito T (1982) Growth, fruit yield and nutrient absorption of tomato plant as influenced by solution temperature in nutrient film technique. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 51 (1): 44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Graaf R (1988) Automation of the water supply of glasshouse crops by means of calculating the transpiration and measuring the amount of drainage water. Acta Hortic 229: 219–231Google Scholar
  7. De Kock PC, Hall A, Inkson RHE (1979) Active iron in plant leaves. Ann Bot 43:737–740Google Scholar
  8. Gosselin A, Trudel MJ (1982) Influence de la temperature du substrat sur la croissance, le développement et le contenu d’eléments minéraux de plants de tomate (cv. Vendor ). Can J Plant Sci 62: 751–757Google Scholar
  9. Gosselin A, Trudel MJ (1983) Interactions between air and root temperature on greenhouse tomatoes. I Growth, development, and yield. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 108: 901–905Google Scholar
  10. Graves CJ (1983) The nutrient film technique. Hortic Rev 5: 1–44Google Scholar
  11. Hipp BW, Gerard CJ (1969) Magnesium-phosphorus interrelationship in tomatoes. Agron J 61: 403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howell W, Bernard RL (1961) Phosphorus response of soybean varieties. Crop Sci 1: 311–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hurd RG, Graves CJ (1985) Some effects of air and root temperature on the yield and quality of glasshouse tomatoes. J Hortic Sci 60: 359–371Google Scholar
  14. Kabu KL, Toop EW (1970) Influence of soil temperature and potassium fertilization on magnesium content of tomato plants. Can J Plant Sci 50: 740–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindsay WL, Hodgson JF, Norvell WA (1967) The physico-chemical equilibrium of metal chelates in soils and their influence on the availability of micro nutrient cations. Trans Meet Commns II and IV, Int Soc Soil Sci 1966, pp 305–316Google Scholar
  16. Maas EV, Hoffman GJ (1977) Crop salt tolerance - current assessment. J Irrigation and Drainage Div, Proc Amer Soc of Civil Engineers, 103, (IR 2): 115–134Google Scholar
  17. Maher MJ (1978) The effect of root-zone warming on tomatoes grown in nutrient solution at two air temperatures. Acta Hortic 82: 113–120Google Scholar
  18. Moorby L, Graves CJ (1980) Root and air temperature effects on growth and yield of tomatoes and lettuce. Acta Hortic 98: 29–43Google Scholar
  19. Proefstation voor Tuinbouw onder Glas (1988) Kwantitatieve informatie voor de Glastuinbouw, 1988–1989, Glasshouse Crops Research Station, Naaldwijk, The Netherlands, p 22Google Scholar
  20. Royle D (1985) Zinc deficiency causes problems in tomatoes on rockwool. Grower 104; 13: 11Google Scholar
  21. Runia WTh, van Os EA, Bollen GJ (1988) Disinfection of drainwater from soilless cultures by heat treatment. Neth J Agric Sci 36: 231–238Google Scholar
  22. Sonneveld C (1987) Magnesium deficiency in rockwool-grown tomatoes as affected by climatic conditions and plant nutrition. J Plant Nutr 10: 1591–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sonneveld C (1988) Rockwool as a substrate in protected cultivation. In: Organizing Committee of Intern. Symp High Technology in Protected Cultivation. Horticulture in High Technology Era, Tokyo, pp 173–191Google Scholar
  24. Sonneveld C, de Bes SS (1984) Micro nutrient uptake of glasshouse cucumbers grown on rockwool. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15: 519–535Google Scholar
  25. Sonneveld C, Straver N (1989) Nutrient solutions for vegetables and flowers grown in water or substrates. Proefstation voor Tuinbouw onder Glas, Naaldwijk, The Netherlands (Voedingsoplossingen glastuinbouw, nr. 8 )Google Scholar
  26. Sonneveld C, Voogt SJ (1975) Studies on the manganese uptake of lettuce on steam-sterilised glasshouse soils. Plant Soil 42: 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sonneveld C, Voogt W (1985a) Studies on the application of iron to some glasshouse vegetables grown in soilless culture. Plant Soil 85: 55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sonneveld C, Voogt W (1985b) Growth and cation absorption of some fruit-vegetable crops grown on rockwool as affected by different cation ratios in the nutrient solution. J Plant Nutr 8: 585–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sonneveld C, Voogt W (1986) Supply and uptake of potassium, calcium and magnesium of spray carnations (Dianthiis caryophyllus) grown in rockwool. Plant Soil 93: 259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sonneveld C, Welles GWH (1984) Growing vegetables in substrates in the Netherlands. Proc Sixth Intern Congr Soilless Culture, Lunteren, ISOSC, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 613–632Google Scholar
  31. Sonneveld C, Welles GWH (1988) Yield and quality of rockwool-grown tomatoes as affected by variations in EC-value and climatic conditions. Plant Soil 111: 37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van der Burg AMM, Sonneveld C (1988) Specific effects of sodium chloride on sweet pepper grown on rockwool in a recirculation system. Glasshouse Crops Res Station, Naaldwijk, The Netherlands. Annu Rep, 1987, 21Google Scholar
  33. van der Burg AMM, Hamaker Ph (1987) Variatie in waterafgifte druppelaars en wateropname. Groenten en Fruit 42; 19: 30–33Google Scholar
  34. van der Burg AMM, Theune D, Sonneveld C (1987) Specific effects of sodium chloride on tomatoes grown in nutrient film. Glasshouse Crops Res Station, Naaldwijk, The Netherlands. Annu Rep 1986, 16Google Scholar
  35. van Os PC, de Kreij C (1987) EC van 2 het beste voor produktie en kwaliteit. Vakbl Bloemisterij 42; 43: 56–57Google Scholar
  36. Verdegaal J (1987) Hoge EC beinvloedt kwaliteit negatief. Vakbl Bloemisterij 42; 42: 65Google Scholar
  37. Voogt W (1988a) K and Ca ratios in the nutrient solution with beefsteak tomatoes. Acta Hortic 222: 155–165Google Scholar
  38. Voogt W (1988b) pH and Mn levels with gerbera. Glasshouse Crops Res Station, Naaldwijk, The Netherlands, Annu Rep 1987, 16Google Scholar
  39. Went FW (1944) Plant growth under controlled conditions. II Thermoperiodicity in growth and fruiting of tomato. Am J Bot 31: 135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zijlstra S, den Nijs APM, Sonneveld C, Vos G (1987) Een nieuwe aanpak van het necroseprobleem bij meeldauwresistente komkommers. Prophyta 41: 138–140Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Glasshouse Crops Research StationNaaldwijkThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations