Transducer Needs for Macrosonics

  • J. A. Gallego-Juarez
Conference paper

Abstract

Macrosonics is the term used for the application of high intensity acoustic energy for producing some kind of permanent effect in a treated medium. Most practical work in macrosonics is done at ultrasonic frequencies, generally within the range of 20 to 100 kHz, usingn acoustic intensities from about 0.1 W/cm to several kW/cm. The main effects produced in macrosonic applications are heat, cavitation, agitation, streaming, interface instabilities and friction, diffusion and mechanical rupture. Transducers for macrosonics are devices of various types with working frequencies within the range of 10 to 100 kHz, power capabilities from hundreds of watts to several kilowatts and large vibration amplitudes. At present, most macrosonic transducers are of the piezoelectric type and have structures based on the classical sandwich arrangement. The main problems for their successful application to industrial processes are related to obtaining uniform amplitude distribution and improving the design and the calculation methods. This paper presents a review of basic piezoelectric transducers for macrosonics and discusses the specific needs for different applications.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Refences

  1. 4.1
    A.E. Clark, “Highly magnetostrictive rare earth compounds for high power acoustic projectors,” in Power Sonic and Ultrasonic Transducers Design, Edited by B. Hamonic and J.N. Decarpigny, Springer-Veriag Berlin Heidelberg, 41–99 (1988).Google Scholar
  2. 4.2
    J.A. Gallego-Juárez, “Piezoelectric ceramics and ultrasonic transducers,” J. Phys. E. Sci. Instrum. 22, 804–816 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.3
    D. Berlincourt, “Piezoelectric crystals and ceramics,” Ultrasonic Transducer Materials, (Edited by O.E. Mattiat), Plenum Press New York, 63–124 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. 4.4
    D. Berlincourt, “Piezoelectric crystals and ceramics,” Ultrasonic Transducer Materials, (Edited by O.E. Mattiat), Plenum Press New York, 63–124 (1971).Google Scholar
  5. 4.5
    S. Van Randeraat, and R.E. Setterington, Piezoelectric ceramics, 2n edition, ( Mullard Ltd, London, 1974 ).Google Scholar
  6. 4.6
    E.A. Neppiras, “The prestressed piezoelectric sandwich transducer,” Ultrasonics International Conference Proc., 295–302 (1973).Google Scholar
  7. 4.7
    E.A. Neppiras, “Very high energy ultrasonics,” British Journal of Applied Physics, 11, 143– 150(1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 4.8
    D. Ensminger, Ultrasonics, 2nd edition, ( Marcel Dekker Inc. New York 1988 ).Google Scholar
  9. 4.9
    K. Adachi and S. Ueha, “Modal vibration control of large ultrasonic tools with the use of wave-trapped horns,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 208–214 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 4.10
    J.A. Gallego-Juárez, “High power ultrasonic transducers for use in gases and interphases,” in Power Sonic and Ultrasonic Transducers Design, Ed. B. Hamonic and J.N.Decarpigny, Springer-Veriag Berlin, 175–184 (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 4.11
    G. Rodriguez-Corral, J.L. San Emeterio, and J.A. Gallego-Juárez, “Focused high-power ultrasonic transducer with stepped-plate radiator for industrial application in gases,” Ultrasonics International Conf. Proc. 794–799 (1987).Google Scholar
  12. 4.12
    R. Montero de Espinosa, and J.A. Gallego-Juárez, “A directional single-element underwater acoustic projector, ” Ultrasonics 24, 100–104 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 4.13
    P. Tierce, and J.N. Decarpigny, “Design of high power transducers for use in macrosonics,” in Power Sonic and Ultrasonic Transducers Design, Ed. B. Hamonic and J.N.Decarpigny, Springer-Verlag Berlin, 185–207 (1988).Google Scholar
  14. 4.14
    J. Tsujino et al., “Some recent applications of high-power ultrasonic using multiple transducers and vibration system,” IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. Proc., 593–598 (1986).Google Scholar
  15. 4.15
    E. Mori et al., “New bolt clamped flexural mode ultrasonic high-power transducer with one dimensional construction,” Ultrasonics International Conf. Proc., 257–261 (1989).Google Scholar
  16. 4.16
    C. Schmidt, “New technology and trends in the industrial application of ultrasonic cleaning,” Ultrasonics International Conf. Proc., 334–339 (1989).Google Scholar
  17. 4.17
    E. Riera, F. Sarabia, and J.A. Gallego-Juárez, “Ultrasonic agglomeration of micron aerosols under standing wave conditions,” J. Sound Vib., 110, 413–427 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 4.18
    G. Rodriguez, J.A. Gallego-Juárez, A. Ramos, J.L. SanEmeterio, and F. Montoya, “Highpower ultrasonic equipment for industrial defoaming,” Ultrasonics International Conf. Proc., 506–511 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Gallego-Juarez
    • 1
  1. 1.UEI UltrasonidosInstituto de Acústica del CSICMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations