A Functional Approach to the Development of the Head of Teleosts: Implications on Constructional Morphology and Constraints

  • Karel F. Liem

Summary

The relative roles of intrinsic and extrinsic determinants of form in teleost skulls is assessed on the basis of a functional approach to development. The patterns of emerging kinematic connections, changing proportions of structural elements, and their probable functions have been analyzed in phylogenetically closely related lineages with strikingly different modes of development: (1) the oviparous Pomacentridae with free-living larvae subjected to intense environmental selection pressures; (2) the viviparous Embiotocidae which give birth to highly developed juveniles that have been shielded from environmental influences. The developmental patterns in the two groups are very similar. Thus it is suggested that transformations in functional components, changes accompanying the proportional reduction in eye size, and the changes in the functional “hot spots” are governed by internal rules inherited from a common ancestor. It is concluded that internal programmatic rules governing the emergence of morphological variations and transformations and their vitally adaptive functions are inseparably interconnected at the level of the generative process.

Keywords

Depression Respiration Lution Bivalve Nism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberch P (1989) The logic of monsters: evidence for internal constraint in development and evolution. Geobios Mém Spéc 12:21–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberch P, Gale E (1985) A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: digital reduction in amphibians. Evolution 39:8–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander RM (1967) The functions and mechanisms of the protrusible upper jaws of some acan-thopterygian fish. J Zool (London) 151:43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balon EK (1985) Early life histories: new developmental, ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Junk, The Hague, 280 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Barel CDN (1983) Towards a constructional morphology of cichlid fishes (Teleostei, Perciformes). Neth J Zool 33:357–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brainerd EL (1985) An experimental analysis of prey capture mechanisms in teleost fishes with implications for present hydrodynamic models of suction feeding. Undergraduate Honors Thesis, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. Dilling L (1989) An ontogenetic study of the jaw mechanism and feeding modes in Amphiprion frenatus and A. polymnus. BSc Honors Thesis Biol, Harvard Univ, 49 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Dullemeijer P (1974) Concepts and approaches in animal morphology. Van Gorcum, Assen, NethGoogle Scholar
  9. Dullemeijer P (1989) On the concept of integration in animal morphology. In: Splechtna H, Hilgers H (eds) Trends in vertebrate morphology. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 18–33Google Scholar
  10. Golomb MR (1990) An analysis of the relative roles of internal and external factors underlying morphogenesis: Patterns of development in labroid fishes. BSc Honors Thesis Biol, Harvard Univ, 70ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Gould SJ (1982) Change in developmental timing as a mechanism of macroevolution. In: Bonner JT (ed) Evolution and development. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 33–346Google Scholar
  12. Ismail HM, Verraes W, Huysseune A (1982) Developmental aspects of the pharyngeal jaws in Astatoti-lapia elegans (Trewavas, 1933) (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Neth J Zool 32:513–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kendall AW, Ahlstrom EH, Moser HG (1984) Early life history stages of fishes and their characters. In: Moser HG et al. (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes, pp 11–22Google Scholar
  14. Lasker R (1981) Marine fish larval. Morphology, ecology and relation to fisheries. Univ Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Lauder GV (1981) Form and function: structural analysis in evolutionary morphology. Paleobiology 7:430–442Google Scholar
  16. Lauder GV (1985) Aquatic feeding in lower vertebrates. In: Hildebrand M, Bramble DM, Liem KF, Wake DB (eds) Functional vertebrate morphology. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 210–229Google Scholar
  17. Lauder GV, Crompton AW, Gans C, Hanken J, Liem KF, Maier WO, Meyer A, Presley R, Rieppel OC, Roth G, Schluter D, Zweers GA (1989) Group report: how are feeding systems integrated and how have evolutionary innovations been introduced? In: Wake DB, Roth G (eds) Complex or-ganismal functions: integration and evolution in vertebrates. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 97–115Google Scholar
  18. Leeuwen JL van, Muller M (1984) Optimum sucking techniques for predatory fish. Trans Zool Soc London 37:137–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liem KF (1970) Functional anatomy of the Nandidae (Pisces, Teleostei). Fieldiana Zool 56:1–66Google Scholar
  20. Liem KF (1978) Modulatory multiplicity in the functional repertoire of the feeding mechanism in cichlid fishes. Part I: Piscivores. J Morphol 158:323–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liem KF (1980) Adaptive significance of intra- and interspecific differences in the feeding repertoires of cichlid fishes. Am Zool 20:295–314Google Scholar
  22. Liem KF (1987) Functional design of the air ventilation apparatus and overland excursions by teleosts. Fieldiana NS 37:1–29Google Scholar
  23. Liem KF (1989) Functional morphology and phylogenetic testing within the framework of symeco-morphosis. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 27:119–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer A (1987) Phenotypic plasticity and heterochrony in Cichlasoma managuense (Pisces, Cichlidae) and their implications for speciation in cichlid fishes. Evolution 4:1357–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris SL, Gaudin AJ (1982) Osteocranial development in the viviparous surfperch Amphistichus argenteus (Pisces: Embiotocidae). J Morphol 174:95–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Osse JWM (1969) Functional anatomy of the head of the perch (Perca fluviatilis L.): an electromyographic study. Neth J Zool, 19:389–392Google Scholar
  27. Osse JWM, Muller M (1980) A model of suction feeding in teleostean fishes with some implications for ventilation. In: Ali MA (ed) Environmental physiology of fishes. Plenum, New York, pp 335–352Google Scholar
  28. Otten E (1982) The development of a mouth-opening mechanism in a generalized Haplochromis species: H. elegans Trewavas, 1933 (Pisces, Cichlidae). Neth J Zool 32:31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Otten E (1983) Vision and jaw mechanism during growth of the cichlid fish Haplochromis elegans. Doct Diss, Univ Leiden, NethGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SA (1984) Ontogeny of prey selection by black surfperch Embiotoca jacksoni (Pisces: Embiotocidae): The role of fish morphology, foraging behavior, and patch selection. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 18:225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sibbing FA (1986) Food handling in the carp (Cyprinus carpio): its movements patterns, mechanisms and limitations. J Zool London A 210:161–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Skelton PW (1985) Preadaptation and evolutionary innovation in rudist bivalves. In: Cope JCW, Skelton PW (eds) Evolutionary case histories from the fossil record. Spec Pap Paleontology 33:159–173Google Scholar
  33. Smith JM, Burian R, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell J, Goodwin B, Lande R, Raup D, Wolpert L (1985) Developmental constraints and evolution. Q Rev Biol 60:265–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stiassny MLJ, Jensen JS (1987) Labroid intrarelationships revisited: morphological complexity, key innovations, and the study of comparative diversity. Bull Mus Comp Zool 151:269–319Google Scholar
  35. Strauss R (1984) Allometry and functional feeding morphology in haplochromine cichlids. In: Echelle AA, Kornfield I (eds) Evolution of species flocks. Univ Press, Maine, pp 217–229Google Scholar
  36. Triplett EL (1959) Note on the life history of the barred surfperch Amphistichus argenteus Agassiz, and a technique for culturing embiotocid embryos. Cal Fish Game 90:433–439Google Scholar
  37. Webb PW, Brett JR (1972) Oxygen consumption of embryos and parents, and oxygen transfer characteristics within the ovary of two species of viviparous seaperch, Rhacochilus vacca and Embiotoca lateralis. J Fish Res Bd Can 29:1543–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wiebe J (1968) The reproductive cycle of the viviparous seaperch Cymatogaster aggregata Gibbons. Can J Zool 46:1221–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wourms JP (1981) Viviparity: The maternal-fetal relationship in fishes. Am Zool 21:473–515Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karel F. Liem
    • 1
  1. 1.Museum of Comparative ZoologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations