Skip to main content

Prediction of Development of Glaucoma in Ocular Hypertensive Patients

  • Conference paper
Glaucoma Update IV

Abstract

This multivariate analysis study was designed to identify parameters to predict which ocular hypertensive (OHT) patients will remain OHT during follow-up and which will develop glaucoma. Material included 96 OHT patients aged 25–75 (mean 57) years. All had a minimum of 5 years (mean 9 + /-2.5, range 5–15) follow-up during which their optic discs were photographed at least three times. The patients were divided into two groups randomly. The best identifying combination of variables was determined in group 1. The model was then tested in group 2.

Variables available at the beginning of the follow-up yielded good specificity but poor sensitivity. The factors best separating stable OHT patients from the ones who developed glaucoma in group 1 were:

  • Initial rim area

  • Change of rim area/year of follow-up

  • Standard deviation of the mean defect of the initial visual field

In group 2 this model correctly classified 81% of the patients with 72% sensitivity and 87% specificity. Intraocular pressure (IOP) variables, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) score and peripapillary atrophy (PPA) were poor predictors.

Information obtainable at the patients first visit does not seem to be sensitive enough. Inclusion of variables obtainable during a relatively short period of follow-up will increase predictive power of the model considerably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Airaksinen PJ, Drance SM, Schulzer M (1985) Neuroretinal rim area in early glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 99:1–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Airaksinen PJ, Juvala PA, Tuulonen A, Alanko HI, Valkonen R, Tuohino A (1987) Change of peripapillary atrophy in glaucoma. In: Krieglstein GK (ed) Glaucoma Update III. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 97–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DR (1983) Correlation of the peripapillary anatomy with the disc damage and field abnormalities in glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 35:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DR (1989) Glaucoma: The damage caused by pressure XLVI Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 108:485–495

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson B (1981) The prevalence of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 65:46–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drance SM, Schulzer M, Douglas GR et al (1978) Use of discriminant analysis: II. Identification of persons with glaucomatous visual field defects. Arch Ophthalmol 96:1571–1573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drance SM, Lakowski R, Schulzer M et al (1981a) Acquired color vision changes in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 99:829–831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drance SM, Schulzer M, Thomas B, Douglas GR (1981b) Multivariate analysis in glaucoma. Use of discriminant analysis in predicting glaucomatous visual field damage. Arch Ophthalmol 99: 1019–1022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy DM, Sanders LE, Eddy JF (1983) The value of screening for glaucoma with tonometry. Surv Ophthalmol 28:194–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart WM, Yablonski M, Kass MA et al (1979) Multivariate analysis of risk of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 97: 1455–1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heijl A, Samander C (1985) Peripapillary atrophy and glaucomatous visual field defects. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 42:403–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas JB, Naumann GOH (1988) Die parapapilläre Region in Normal- und Glaukomaugen. II. Korrelation der planimetrischen Befunde zu intrapapillären, perimetrischen und allgemeinen Daten. Klin Mbl Augenheilk 191:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juvala PA, Airaksinen PJ, Alanko HI, Tuulonen AE, Valkonen RT (1987) Change in rim area of the optic nerve in ocular hypertensives and patients with glaucoma. Chibret International Journal of Ophthalmology 5:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitazawa Y, Horie T, Aoki S, Suzuki M, Nishioka K (1977) Untreated ocular hypertension. A long-term prospective study. Arch Ophthalmol 95: 1180–1184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin P, Schwartz B, Nanba K (1985) The reproducibility of computerized boundary analysis for measuring optic disc pallor in the normal optic disc. Ophthalmology 92:243–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ (1991) First glaucomatous optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and the mode of their progression. (Submitted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Airaksinen, P.J., Tuulonen, A., Alanko, H.I. (1991). Prediction of Development of Glaucoma in Ocular Hypertensive Patients. In: Krieglstein, G.K. (eds) Glaucoma Update IV. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76084-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76084-6_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-76086-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76084-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics