Histomorphological Findings in Different Cementless Anchored Humerus Prostheses
Limb salvage procedures in the treatment of malignant bone tumors of the upper extremity have been performed in Vienna since the early 1970s [1,4–6]. Endoprostheses with different anchorage systems and made of various materials have been constructed to obtain a maximum of function and long-term stability with a minimum oflocal tissue irritation. Consequently this led to systems which relied on a biological fixation in the bone without the use of bone cement. Improvements of constructional details like the use of adequate materials and surface structures together with extracortical or intramedullary fixation were partly based on histological findings on retrieved implants. This study summarizes our experience in 15 cases of retreieved humerus endoprostheses.
KeywordsLimb Salvage Bone Ingrowth Malignant Bone Tumor Intramedullary Fixation Limb Salvage Procedure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Plenk H Jr (1986) The microscopic evaluation of hard tissue implants. In: Williams DF (ed) CRC series in biocompatibility. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 35–81Google Scholar
- 3.Bos G, Sim FH, Pritchard DJ, Shives TC, Rock M, Askew L, Chao EYS (1987) Prosthetic proximal humeral replacement: the Mayo Clinic experience. In: Enneking WF (ed) Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology. Livingstone, New York, pp 61–72Google Scholar
- 4.Sekera J, Ramach W, Pongracz, Salzer-Kuntschik M, Kotz R, Knahr K, Salzer M (1987) Experience with ceramic and metal implants for the proximal humerus in cases of malignant bone tumor. In: Enneking WF (ed) Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology. Livingstone, New York, pp 211–215Google Scholar