Advertisement

Water Vapor and Oxygen Permeabilities of Polyetherurethanes

  • Mutlu Karakelle
  • Robert A. Taller
Conference paper

Abstract

Effects of soft segment content, hydrophilicity of polyether macroglycol soft segment and presence of polydimethylsiloxane co-soft segment on oxygen and water vapor permeabilities of polyetherurethanes were investigated. Polyetherurethanes were synthesized using a bulk synthesis procedure and solution cast as thin films. Oxygen and water vapor transport measurements were performed at 38 °C, 100% relative humidity (RH) and 4 mm Hg oxygen gradient, and 40 °C and 80% RH test gradient, respectively. The soft segment content and structure had profound influences on oxygen and water vapor permeabilities of the polyetherurethanes. Water vapor and oxygen permeabilities of polyetherurethanes increased with increasing soft segment content. Polytetramethylene oxide based polyetherurethanes (PTMO-PEU) had high oxygen permeabilities and polyethylene oxide based polyetherurethanes (PEO-PEU) had high water vapor permeabilities. Addition of silicone co-soft segment increased water vapor permeability and slightly reduced oxygen permeability of PTMO-PEU. Its effect on PEO-PEU was the reverse of that of the PTMO-PEU systems.

Keywords

Soft Segment Water Vapor Permeability Oxygen Permeability Polyethylene Oxide Phthalic Anhydride 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ulrich H and Bonk HW (1984) Emerging biomedical applications of polyurethane elastomers in: Planck H, Egbers G and Syre I (eds) Polyurethanes in Biomedical Engineering, Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ng HN, Allegrezza AE, Seymour RW and Cooper SL (1973) Effect of segment size and polydispersity on the properties of polyurethane block polymers, Polymer, 14: 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karakelle M and Zdrahala RJ (1987) Hydrophilic polyurethane membranes: Ionic permeability/structure relationship, in: Sedlack B and Kahovec J (eds) Synthetic Polymer Membranes, deGruyter, W BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schneider NS, Dusablon LV, Snell EW and Prosser RA (1969) Water vapor transport in structurally varied polyurethanes, J Macromol Sci, B3 (4): 623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McBride JS, Massaro TA and Cooper SL (1979) Diffusion of gases through polyurethane block polymers, J Appl Poly Sci, 23: 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knight PM and Lyman DJ (1984) Gas permeability of various block copolyether-urethanes, J Memb Sci, 17: 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zdrahala RJ, Spielvogel DE and Strand MA (1988) Softening of thermoplastic polyurethanes: A structure/property study, J Biomat Appl, 2: 544CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mutlu Karakelle
    • 1
  • Robert A. Taller
    • 1
  1. 1.Becton Dickinson Polymer ResearchDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations