Cellular Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease: Implications for Corticocortical Disconnection and Differential Vulnerability

  • J. H. Morrison
  • P. R. Hof
  • M. J. Campbell
  • A. D. De Lima
  • T. Voigt
  • C. Bouras
  • K. Cox
  • W. G. Young
Part of the Research and Perspectives in Alzheimer’s Disease book series (ALZHEIMER)


Detailed regional and laminar analyses of the neuropathological lesions in Alzheimer’s disease have led several investigators to hypothesize that key corticocortical and hippocampal circuits are compromised. In fact it has been suggested that a global corticocortical disconnection occurs in Alzheimer’s disease, thereby disrupting cohesive, integrated cortical functions and leading to dementia. Our efforts in Alzheimer’s disease research are proceeding along two related pathways. First, we are analyzing the pathological human cortex to develop a more detailed profile of the morphology and biochemical phenotype of the subset of neocortical neurons that are vulnerable top degeneration and/or neurofibrillary tangle formation. The second research strategy is to use experimental methods in a nonhuman primate to characterize the morphology, biochemical phenotype, and afferents to the pyramidal cells that furnish long corticocortical projections. Our intention is to correlate the results from the monkey experimental analyses with our neuropathological results to further characterize the degree to which the vulnerable corticocortical neurons in Alzheimer’s disease represent the human homologue of the eorticocortieally projecting neurons under study in the monkey. Within this context we have demonstrated that SMI-32, a monoclonal antibody to nonphosphorylated neurofilament protein, labels a subpopulation of pyramidal cells in layers III and V of neocortical association areas. The morphology and location of these neurons suggest that they furnish long corticocortical projections. In addition, combined immunohistochemistry transport studies in monkey demonstrated that certain corticocortically projecting neurons are SMI- 32-immunoreactive. The relative proportion of the corticocortical input to a given location that is SMI-32-immunoreactive varies systematically depending on the source of the projection, but up to 85% of the cells furnishing the projection from inferior temporal to dorsal prefrontal cortex are SMI-32-immunoreactive. Combined intracellular injection-retrograde transport studies demonstrated that, while this projection from inferior temporal cortex to dorsal prefrontal cortex may reflect a huge degree of biochemical homogeneity regarding SMI-32, the cells of origin are a morphologically diverse group. Antisera to calcium-binding proteins demonstrated that, while certain pyramidal cells might have heightened vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease, the GABAergic interneurons labeled by antisera to calcium-binding proteins do not display any cell loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Thus, the biochemical and anatomical profiles of the vulnerable and pathology-resistant cells in Alzheimer’s disease are becoming increasingly comprehensive; however, a precise biochemical or morphological “signature” for vulnerability has not yet emerged.


Pyramidal Cell Inferior Temporal Gyrus Human Cortex Biochemical Phenotype Inferior Temporal Cortex 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barbas H (1986) Pattern in the laminar origin of cortieocortical connections. J Comp Neurol 252:415–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braak H, Braak E (1986) Ratio of pyramidal cells versus non-pyramidal cells in the human frontal isocortex and changes in ratio with ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. In: Swaab DF, Fliers E, Mirmiran M, Van Gool WA, Van Haaren F (eds) Progress in Brain Research, vol 70. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 185–212Google Scholar
  3. Braak H, Braak E, Kalus P (1989) Alzheimer’s disease: areal and laminar pathology in the occipital isocortex. Acta Neuropathol 77:494–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell M J, Morrison JH (1989) A monoclonal antibody to neurofilament protein (SMI-32) labels a subpopulation of pyramidal neurons in the human and monkey neocortex. J Comp Neurol 282:191–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell MJ, Hof PR, Cox K, Timber TA, Young WG, Morrison JH (1989) A subset of primate corticocortical neurons are neurofilament protein (NFP) immunoreactive (ir): a combined retrograde immunohistochemical study. Proc Soc Neurosci 15:72Google Scholar
  6. Celio MR, Schârer L, Morrison JH, Norman AW, Bloom FE (1986) Calbindin immunoreactivity alternates with cytochrome c-oxidase-rich zones in some layers of the primate visual cortex. Nature 323:715–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Celio MR, Baier W, Schârer L, De Viragh PA, Gerday C (1988) Monoclonal antibodies directed against the calcium binding protein parvalbumin. Cell Calcium 9:81–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collerton D (1986) Cholinergic function and intellectual decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience 19:1–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conti F, Fabri M, Manzoni T (1988) Immunocytochemical evidence for glutamatergic corticocortical connections in monkeys. Brain Res 462:148–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Lima AD, Voigt T, Morrison JH (1989) Morphology of the cells within the inferior temporal gyrus that project to the prefrontal cortex in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol, in pressGoogle Scholar
  11. De Yoe EA, Van Essen DC (1988) Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends Neurosci 11:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duyekaerts C, Hauw J-J, Bastenaire F, Piette F, Poulain C, Rainsard V, Javoy-Agid F, Berthaux P (1986) Laminar distribution of neocortical senile plaques in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Acta Neuropathol 70:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenamyre JT, Penney JB, Young AB, D’Amato CJ, Hicks SP, Shoulson I (1985) Alterations in L-glutamate binding in Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s diseases. Science 227:1496–1499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K, Tung YC, Kinlan M, Wisniewski HM, Binder LI (1986) Abnormal phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein (tau) in Alzheimer cytoskeletal pathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:4913–4917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen LA, DeTeresa R, Davies P, Terry RD (1988) Neocortical morphometry, lesions counts, and choline acetyltransferase levels in the age spectrum of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 38:48–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hausser CO, Robert F, Giard N (1980) Balint’s syndrome. Can J Neurol Sci 7:157–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hendry SHC, Jones EG, Emson PC, Lawson DEM, Heizmann CW, Streit P (1989) Two classes of cortical GAB A neurons defined by differential calcium binding protein immunoreactivities. Exp Brain Res 767:467–472Google Scholar
  18. Hof PR, Cox K, Morrison JH (1988) Quantitative analysis of non-phosphorylated neurofilament protein (NPNFP)-immunoreactive neurons in normal and Alzheimer’s, disease brain. Proc Soc Neurosci 14:1086Google Scholar
  19. Hof PR, Bouras C, Constantinidis J, Morrison JH (1989) Balint’s syndrome in Alzheimer’s disease: specific disruption of the oecipito-parietal visual pathway. Brain Res 493:368–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hof PR, Bouras C, Constantinidis J, Morrison JH (1989) Selective disconnection of specific visual association pathways in cases of Alzheimer’s disease presenting with Balint’s syndrome. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, in pressGoogle Scholar
  21. Hyman BT, Van Hoesen GW, Kromer LJ, Damasio AR (1986) Perforant pathway changes in the memory impairment of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 20:472–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hyman BT, Van Hoesen GW, Damasio AR (1987) Alzheimer’s disease: glutamate depletion in the hippocampal perforant pathway zone. Ann Neurol 22:37–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iversen LL, Rossor MN, Reynolds GP, Hills R, Roth M, Mountjoy CQ, Foote SL, Morrison JH, Bloom FE (1983) Loss of pigmented dopamine-β-hydroxylase positive cells from locus coeruleus in senile dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Neurosci Lett 39:95–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joachim CL, Morris JH, Selkoe DJ, Kosik KS (1987) Tau epitopes are incorporated into a range of lesions in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 46:611–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katz B, Rimmer S (1989) Ophthalmologic manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease. Surv Ophthalmol 34:31–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kemper TL (1984) Neuroanatomical and neuropathological changes in normal aging and dementia. In: Albert ML (ed) Clinical neurology of aging. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 9–52Google Scholar
  27. Lee VMY, Otvos Jr L, Carden MJ, Hollosi M, Dietzschold B, Lazzarini RA (1988) Identification of the major multiphosphorylation site in mammalian neurofilaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:1998–2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis DA, Campbell MJ, Terry RD, Morrison JH (1987) Laminar and regional distributions of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: a quantitative study of visual and auditory cortices. J Neurosci 7:1799–1808PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG, Macko KA (1983) Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. TINS 6:414–417Google Scholar
  30. Morrison JH, Scherr S, Lewis DA, Campbell MJ, Bloom FE, Rogers J, Benoit R (1986) The laminar and regional distribution of neocortical somatostatin and neuritic plaques: implications for Alzheimer’s disease as a global neocortical disconnection syndrome. In: Scheibel AB, Wechsler AF (eds) The biological substrates of Alzheimer’s disease, UCLA Forum in Medical Sciences, vol 27. Academic, Orlando, pp 115–131Google Scholar
  31. Morrison JH, Lewis DA, Campbell MJ, Huntley GW, Benson DL, Bouras C (1987) A monoclonal antibody to non-phosphorylated neurofilament protein marks the vulnerable cortical neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res 416:331–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morrison JH, Cox K, Hof PR, Celio MR (1988) Neocortical parvalbumin-containing neurons are resistant to degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Soc Neurosci 14:1085Google Scholar
  33. Mountjoy CQ, Roth M, Evans NJR, Evans HM (1983) Cortical neuronal counts in normal elderly controls and demented patients. Neurobiol Aging 4: 1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pearson RCA, Esiri MM, Hiorns RW, Wilcock GK, Powell TPS (1985) Anatomical correlates of the distribution of the pathological changes in the neocortex in Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:4531–4534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perry G, Rizzuto N, Autilio-Gambetti L, Gambetti P (1985) Paired helical filaments from Alzheimer disease patients contain cytoskeletal components. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:3916–3920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rapoport SI (1987) Alzheimer’s disease: phylogenetic vulnerability of associative neocortex and its connections. In: Davies P, Finch CE (eds) Molecular neuropathology of aging, Banbury Report, vol 27. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, pp 37–54Google Scholar
  37. Roberts GW, Crow TJ, Polak JM (1985) Location of neuronal tangles in somatostatin neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 314:92–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogers J, Morrison JH (1985) Quantitative morphology and regional and laminar distributions of senile plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 5:2801–2808PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rossor MN (1982) Dementia. Lancet 2:1200–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rossor MN, Iversen LL, Reynolds GP, Mountjoy CQ, Roth M (1984) Neurochemical characteristics of early and late onset types of Alzheimer’s disease. Br Med J 288:961–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Selkoe DJ (1989) Biochemistry of altered brain proteins in Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Neurosci 12:463–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shipp S, Zeki S (1989 a) The organization of connections between areas V5 and VI in macaque monkey visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci 1:309–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shipp S, Zeki S (1989 b) The organization of connections between areas V5 and V2 in macaque monkey visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci 1:333–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sternberger LA, Sternberger NH (1983) Monoclonal antibodies distinguish phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of neurofilaments in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:6126–6130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Terry RD, Peck A, DeTeresa R, Schechter R, Horoupian DS (1981) Some morphometric aspects of the brain in the senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Ann Neurol 10:184–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Essen DC (1985) Functional organization of primate visual cortex. In: Peters A, Jones EG (eds) Cerebral cortex, vol 3 (Visual cortex). Plenum Press, New York, pp 259–329Google Scholar
  47. Wilcock GK, Esiri MM (1982) Plaques, tangles and dementia - a quantitative study. J Neurol Sci 56:343–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Morrison
  • P. R. Hof
  • M. J. Campbell
  • A. D. De Lima
  • T. Voigt
  • C. Bouras
  • K. Cox
  • W. G. Young

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations