The Effects of Commodity Programs on Resource Use

  • J. A. Miranowski
  • J. Hrubovcak
  • J. Sutton
Part of the Agricultural Management and Economics book series (AGRICULT.MANAG.)


Agricultural economists are entering an exciting and challenging era with significant opportunities to coordinate agricultural and resource policies to achieve greater “consistency”2. The Food Security Act (FSA) of 1985 ushered in a new set of commodity and conservation policies. For the first time, the farm bill contained an active conservation title that introduced significant new efforts to protect natural resources. Simultaneously, these conservation provisions contributed to commodity supply control objectives and reduced commodity program outlays. But conservation policy alone may not be efficacious in altering agricultural production in environmentally sensitive areas.


Policy Reform Conservation Reserve Program Resource Policy Crop Acreage Farm Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boyd R (1987) An economic model of direct and indirect effects of tax reform on agriculture. US Dep Agric, Econ Res Ser, Washington DC, Tech Bull 1743Google Scholar
  2. Capalbo SM, Vo TT (1988) A review of the evidence on agricultural productivity and aggregate technology. In: Capalbo SM, Antle JM (eds) Agricultural productivity measurement and explanation. Resources for the Future, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Kawagoe T, Otsuka K, Hay ami Y (1986) Induced bias of technical change in agriculture: the United States and Japan, 1880–1980. J Pol Econ 94 (3):523–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Miranowski JA (1975) The demand for agricultural crop chemicals under alternative farm program and pollution control solutions. Thesis, Harvard Univ, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Miranowski JA (1980) Estimating the relationship between pest management and energy prices, and the implications for environmental damage. Am J Agric Econ 62 (5): 995–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Miranowski JA, Reichelderfer KH (1985) Resource conservation programs in the farm policy arena. Agricultural-Food Policy Review: Commodity Program Perspectives, US Dep Agric, Washington DC, Econ Res Serv, Agric Econ Rep 530Google Scholar
  7. Miranowski JA, Shoemaker R, Ball V (1987) Productivity and resource use impacts of environmental regulations on the agricultural economy. In: The role of exactions in controlling pollution. Stocker FD (ed) Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Tax Policy Roundtable, Property Tax Pap Ser, No TPR-15Google Scholar
  8. Nielsen EG, Lee LK (1987) The magnitude and costs of groundwater contamination from agricultural chemicals: a national perspective. US Dep Agric, Washington DC, Econ Res Serv, Staff Rep AGES870318Google Scholar
  9. Suguiyama L, Reichelderfer KH (1987) Regional variation in farm input use: The case of pesticides. Agribusiness 3 (2):221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Taylor RC (1989) Stochastic simulation of the aggregate impacts of agricultural policy and technological change. Dep Agric Econ Rural Soc, Auburn Univ, Alabama, Staff Pap ES89–7Google Scholar
  11. US Department of Agriculture (1988) Economic indicators of the farm sector: national financial summary, 1987. Econ Res Serv ECIFS7–2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Miranowski
  • J. Hrubovcak
  • J. Sutton
    • 1

Personalised recommendations