Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wert der Biopsie

  • Conference paper
Radiologische Dünndarmdiagnostik

  • 13 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Dünndarm ist unter funktionellen Aspekten ein komplexes Organ: Er steht im Dienste der Digestion und Resorption. Er ist ein permanent exponiertes immunologisches Kontaktorgan [Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue (GALT)] und insofern von entscheidender Bedeutung für die Entwicklung und Aufrechterhaltung der immunologischen Homöostase des Organismus. Der Dünndarm ist schließlich ein endokrines Organ [1, 8, 10, 15, 17, 22, 23, 26, 31].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Asquith P (ed) (1979) Immunology of the gastrointestinal tract. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bienenstock J, Befus AD (1980) Mucosal immunology. Immunology 41:249–270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blum AL (1973) Malabsorptionssyndrome. In: Frommhold W, Gerhard P (Hrsg) Erkrankungen des Dünndarms, Bd 2. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 127–156

    Google Scholar 

  4. Booth CC, Stewart JS, Holmes R, Brackenbury W (1962) Dissecting microscope appearances of intestinal mucosa. In: Wolstenholme GEW, Cameron MP (eds) Ciba Foundation Study Group No 14: Intestinal biopsy. Churchill, London, pp 2–23

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke RM (1970a) Mucosal architecture and epithelial cell production rate in the small intestine of the albino rat. J Anat 107:519–529

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke RM (1970b) A new method of measuring of the rate of shedding of epithelial cells from the intestinal villus of the rat. Gut 11:1015–1019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Craemer B (ed) (1974) The small intestine. Heinemann Medical Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dockray GJ (1977) Progress in gastroenterology. Molecular evolution of gut hormones: application of comparative studies on the regulation of digestion. Gastroenterology 72:344–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eastwood GL (1977) Gastrointestinal epithelial renewal. Progress in gastroenterology. Gastroenterology 72:962–975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eberlein-Gonska M, Herbay A von, Otto HF (1987) Funktionelle Morphologie des Dünndarms. In: Caspary WF (Hrsg) Struktur und Funktion des Dünndarms, Diabetes-Forum-Reihe, Bd I. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam Hongkong Princeton Sydney Tokio, S 9–61

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ermak ThH, Owen RL (1987) Phenotype and distribution of T lymphocytes in Peyer’s patches of athymic mice. Histochemistry 87:321–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ermak ThH, Steger HJ, Owen RL, Strober S (1988) Depletion and repopulation of lymphocytes in Peyer’s patches of mice after total lymphoid irradiation. Lab Invest 59(5):591–597

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ermak ThH, Steger HJ, Strober S, Owen RL (1989) M cells and granular mono-nuclear cells in Peyer’s patch domes of mice depleted of their lymphocytes by total lymphoid irradiation. Am J Pathol 134:529–537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Filipe MI, Branfoot AC (1976) Mucin histochemistry of the colon. In: Morson BC (ed). Pathology of the gastro-intestinal tract. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 143–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Gershon MD, Erde SM (1981) The nervous system of the gut. Gastroenterology 80:1571–1594

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gottesbüren H, Riecken EO (1977) Die Dünndarmbiopsie — Methodik und diagnostische Aussage. Leber Magen Darm 7(3):182–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heitz PhU (1979) The neuroendocrine system of the gastrointestinal tract. Path Res Pract 165:333–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Herbay A von, Otto HF (1988) Whipple’s disease: A report of 22 patients. Klin Wochenschr 66:533–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Herbay A von, Windler F, Heckmayr M, Langkowski J, Kraas E, Otto HF (1987) Abdominaler Pseudotumor als klinische Manifestation eines Morbus Whipple. Dtsch med Wschr 112:1621–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holmes R (1971) The intestinal brush border. Gut 12:668–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Holmes R, Hourihane D O’B, Booth CC (1961) Dissecting microscope appearances of jejunal biopsy specimens from patients with idiopathic steatorrhoea. Lancet 1:81–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Immunology of the gut (1977) Ciba Foundation Symposium 46 (new series). Elsevier. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam Oxford New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jarry A, Cerf-Bensussan N, Flejou JF, Brousse N (1988) Le Système lymphoide du tube digestif chez l’homme. Ann Pathol 8:265–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jarry A, Robaszkiewicz M, Brousse N, Potet N (1989) Immune cells associated with M cells in the follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer’s patches in the rat. Cell Tiss Res 255:293–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Möller P, Mielke B, Buhl K, Buhr H, Schlag P, Otto HF (1989) Gastrointestinale Lymphome. Z Gastroenterol Verh-Bd 24:115–119

    Google Scholar 

  26. Otto HF (1983) Topographie, makroskopische Anatomie und Histologie. In: Caspary WF (Hrsg) Dünndarm. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (Handbuch der inneren Medizin, Bd III/3 A, S. 29–69)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Otto HF (1983) Dünndarmbiopsie: Morphologie. In: Caspary WF (Hrsg) Dünndarm. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (Handbuch der inneren Medizin, Bd III/3 A, S 910–935)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Otto HF (1983) Bioptische Diagnostik der Dünndarmerkrankungen. Leber Magen Darm 13(6):243–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Otto HF, Gebbers J-O (1977) Die Dünndarmbiopsie. In: Gheorghiū T (Hrsg) Das gastroenterologische Kompendium, Bd. 2. Witzstrock, Baden-Baden Brüssel Köln New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Perera DR, Weinstein WM, Rubin CE (1975) Small intestinal biopsy. Human Pathology 2:157–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Polak JM, Bloom SR, Wright NA, Daly MJ (eds) (1982) Structure of the gut. Basic science in gastroenterology. Glaxo, Ware, Herts/UK

    Google Scholar 

  32. Riecken EO (1983) Einheimische Sprue. In: Caspary WF (Hrsg) Dünndarm. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (Handbuch der inneren Medizin. Bd III/ 3A, S 3–32)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roitt I, Brostoff J, Male D (1987) Immunology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London Melbourne New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rubin CE, Dobbins WO (1965) Peroral biopsy of the small intestine. A review of its diagnostic usefulness. Gastroenterology 49:676–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rubin CE, Brandborg LL, Phelps PC, Taylor HC (1960) Studies of celiac disease. I. The apparent identical and specific nature of the duodenal and proximal jejunal lesion in celiac disease and idiopathic sprue. Gastroenterology 38:28–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Salter DM, Krajewski AS, Dewar AE (1986) Immunophenotype analysis of malignant histiocytosis of the intestine. J Clin Pathol 39:8–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Trier JS (1971) Diagnostic value of the biopsy of the small intestine. N Engl J Med 285:1470–1473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Trier JS, Falchuk MZ, Carey CM, SchreiberDS (1978) Celiac sprue and refractory sprue. Gastroenterology 75(2):307–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoshioka H, Ohshio G, Furukawa F, Inada M, Miata S, Hamashima Y, Miyake T (1988) Immunohistochemical examination of Peyer’s patches in autoimmune mice. Histochemistry 90:145–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pathologisches Institut der Universität, Im Neuenheimer Feld 220/221, D-6900, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    H. F. Otto

Authors
  1. H. F. Otto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Instituts für Strahlendiagnostik, Leopoldina-Krankenhaus, Gustav-Adolf-Straße 8, D-8720, Schweinfurt, Deutschland

    Enno Trüber (Chefarzt) (Chefarzt)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Otto, H.F. (1990). Wert der Biopsie. In: Trüber, E. (eds) Radiologische Dünndarmdiagnostik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75388-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75388-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-52106-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75388-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation