Teaching Direct and Inverse Problems by Means of User Friendly Interfaces: A Status Report

  • G. Crosta
  • D. Bertoncelli
  • F. Coladonato
  • M. Gandolfi
  • G. Ponzini
Conference paper
Part of the Inverse Problems and Theoretical Imaging book series (IPTI)

Abstract

It is by now widely accepted that a computer is just another means, by which human beings communicate. Consider e. g. the task of communicating to an increasingly wider audience both the scope and limitations of a computer code, which implements some mathematical model: the functions of a computer must then consist of both crunching numbers and handling graphics information. The user-friendly interfaces we are developing apply to codes, which model some processes in groundwater flow: in this area simulation (the direct problem) and parameter identification (the inverse problem) are closely related. We shall describe a direct problem solver, which simulates flow in a multi-layered porous medium and a package of inverse problem solvers, where different methods are applied. The users which we expect to “benefit” from our products are graduate students in the College of Science, Stale University of Milan. The description of each product will consist of an outline of the model, of the corresponding algorithm and its implementation.

Keywords

Azimuth Geophysics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chavent G., 1971: “Analyse fonctionnelle et identification des coefficients repartis dans les equations aux derivees partielles”, These d’ Etat, Fac. des Sciences, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Crosta G., 1987: “A Substitution Method Applied to the Identification of the Leading Coefficient Appearing in Linear Equations of Elliptic Type”, in P.C. Sabatier, Ed. Advances in Electronics & Electron Physics, Suppl. 19 — Inverse Problems, pp 523–32, Academic: London.Google Scholar
  3. Crosta G., 1988: “The Energy Functions of Coefficient Identification Algorithms”, in P.C. Sabatier Ed., Some Topics on Inverse Problems, pp. 79–92, World Scientific: Singapore.Google Scholar
  4. Crosta G., 1989: “On the Approximate Identification of the Leading Coefficient of a Linear Elliptic Equation by Output Error and Equation Error Minimisation”, Optimal Control, 10, 229 253.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Gambolati G., Toffolo F., Uliana F.,1984: “Groundwater response under an electronuclear plant to a river flood wave analized by a nonlinear finite element model”, Water Resources Research, 20, (7), 903–13.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Ponzini G. S., Crosta G., 1988: “The Comparison Model Method: a New Arithmetic Approach to the Discrete Inverse Problem of Groundwater Hydrology ”, Transport in Porous Media, 3, 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ponzini G.S., Crosta G., Giudici M., 1989a: “Identification of Thermal Conductivities by Temperature Gradient Profiles: One-dimensional Steady Flow”, Geophysics, 54, 643–53.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Ponzini G.S., Crosta G., Giudici M., 1989b: “The Mydrogeological Role of an Aquitard in preventing Drinkable Water Well Contamination: A Case Study”, Environmental Health Perspectives, 83 (to appear).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Crosta
    • 1
  • D. Bertoncelli
    • 1
  • F. Coladonato
    • 1
  • M. Gandolfi
    • 1
  • G. Ponzini
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Information SciencesState University of MilanMilanItaly
  2. 2.Dept. of Earth Sciences, Geophysics SectionState University of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations