Abstract
Mutations are double-faced like Janus. They are most often detrimental to their carriers — they also represent the ultimate source of genetic variability and, hence, of evolution. This antagonism requires a delicate balance. It may be achieved by one or more of three different strategies:
-
1.
Mutations do not entirely occur at random in the genome. This is evident for specific types of somatic mutations in mammals (Baltimore 1981; Golub 1987; Meyer et al. 1986) and for transposon-induction of mutations in the germ line (Engels and Preston 1984; O’Hare and Rubin 1983; Rubin et al. 1982; see also Campbell 1983, and Syvanen 1984).
-
2.
Mutation rates are adjusted to evolutionary requirements. This has since long been discussed controversially (Benado et al. 1976; Biémont et al. 1987; Chao et al. 1983; Cox and Gibson 1974; Dobzhansky et al. 1952; Gillespie 1981; Holsinger and Feldman 1983; Ives 1950; Nöthel 1983, 1987; Sturtevant 1937) but seems more likely in view of the surprising mixture of error-proof and error-prone (i.e. mutagenic) mechanisms of DNA repair (Kimball 1987).
-
3.
In diploids, the genetic load due to recessive variants is not a mutational load that has to be avoided in order to gain optimal population fitness, but mainly is a tolerable “segregational noise” produced by selectively favoured heterozygotes according to the “balance-hypothesis”.
Chapter PDF
References
Baltimore D (1981) Somatic mutation gains its place among the generators of diversity. Cell 26: 295–296
Belyaeva ES, Pasyukova EG, Gvozdev VA, Ilyin YV, Kaidanov LZ (1982) Transposition of mobile dispersed genes in Drosophila melanogaster and fitness of stocks. Mol Gen Genet 185: 324–328
Benado MB, Ayala FJ, Green MM (1976) Evolution of experimental “mutator” populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 82: 43–52
Biémont C (1986) Polymorphism of the mdg-1 and I mobile elements in Drosophila melanogaster.Chromosoma (Berl) 93: 393–397
Biémont C, Aouar A (1987) Copy-number dependent transpositions and excisions of the mdg-1 mobile element in inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 58: 39–47
Biémont C, Aouar A, Arnault C (1987) Genome reshuffling of the copia element in an inbredline of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature (Lond) 329: 742–744
Bingham PM, Kidwell MG, Rubin GM (1982) The molecular basis of P-M hybrid dysgenesis: The role of the P element, a Pf-strain-specific transposon family. Cell 29: 995–1004
Campbell A (1983) Transposons and their evolutionary significance. In: Nei M, Koehn RK (eds) Evolution of genes and proteins. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 258–279
Chao L, Vargas C, Spear BB, Cox EC (1983) Transposable elements as mutator genes in evolution. Nature (Lond) 303: 633–635
Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1983) The population dynamics of transposable elements. Genet Res 42: 1–27
Cox EC, Gibson TC (1974) Selection for high mutation rates in chemostats. Genetics 77: 169– 184
Dobzhansky T, Spassky B, Spassky N (1952) A comparative study of mutation rates in two ecologically diverse species of Drosophila. Genetics 37: 650–664
Doerjer F, Bedell MA, Oesch F (1984) DNA adducts and their biological relevance. In: Obe G (ed) Mutations in man. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo
Engels WR (1984) A transacting product needed for P factor transposition in Drosophila. Science 226: 1194–1196
Engels WR, Preston CR (1984) Formation of chromosome rearrangements by P factors in Drosophila. Genetics 107: 657–678
Fitzpatrick BJ, Sved JA (1986) High levels of fitness modifiers induced by hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res 48: 89–94
Foster PL, Davis EF (1987) Loss of an apurinic/apyrimidinic site endonuclease increases the mutagenicity of N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine to Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 2891–2895
Gerasimova TI, Mizrokhi LJ, Georgiev GP (1984) Transposition bursts in genetically unstable Drosophila melanogaster. Nature (Lond) 309: 714–716
Gerasimova TI, Matjunina LV, Mizrokhi LJ, Georgiev GP (1985) Successive transposition explosions in Drosophila melanogaster and reverse transpositions of mobile dispersed genetic elements. EMBO J 4: 3773–3779
Gillespie JH (1981) Mutation modification in a random environment. Evolution 35: 468–476
Ginzburg LR, Bingham PM, Yoo S (1984) On the theory of speciation induced by transposable elements. Genetics 107: 331–341
Golub ES (1987) Somatic mutation: diversity and regulation of the immune repertoire. Cell 48: 723–724
Holsinger KE, Feldman MW (1983) Modifiers of mutation rate: Evolutionary optimum with complete selfing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 6732–6734
Ives PT (1950) The importance of mutation rate genes in evolution. Evolution 4: 236–252
Kidwell MG, Kidwell JF, Ives PT (1977a) Spontaneous non-reciprocal mutation and sterility in strain crosses of Drosophile melanogaster. Mutat Res 42: 89–98
Kidwell MG, Kidwell JF, Sved JA (1977b) Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: a syndrome of aberrant traits including mutation, sterility, and male recombination. Genetics 86: 813–833
Kimball RF (1987) The development of ideas about the effect of DNA repair on the induction of gene mutations and chromosomal aberrations by radiation and by chemicals. Mutat Res 186: 1–34
King RC (1970) Ovarian development in Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, London
Lindsley DL, Grell EH (1968) Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst Wash Publ No 627
Loeb LA, Preston BD (1986) Mutagenesis by apurinic/apyrimidinic sites. Annu Rev Genet 20: 201–230
Mackay TFC (1986) Transposable element-induced fitness mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res 48: 77–87
McClintock B (1984) The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226: 792–801
Meyer J, Jäck HM, Ellis N, Wabl M (1986) High rate of somatic point mutation in vitro in and near the variable-region segment of an immunoglobulin heavy chain gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 6950–6953
Mukai T (1964) The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Spontaneous mutation rate of polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 50: 1–19
Mukai T (1979) Polygenic mutation. In: Thompson JN, Thoday JM (eds) Quantitative genetic variation, Academic Press, Lond, pp 177–196
Mukai T, Chigusa SI, Mettler LE, Crow JF (1972) Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72: 335–355
Nöthel H (1969) Genetische Konstitution und Strahlenempfindlichkeit. Habilitationsschrift, Freie Universität Berlin
Nöthel H (1983) Investigations on radiosensitive and radioresistant populations of Drosophila melanogaster XVI. Adaptation to the mutagenic effects of X-rays in several experimental populations with irradiation histories. Mutat Res 111: 325–340
Nöthel H (1987) Adaptation of Drosphila melanogaster populations to high mutation pressure: evolutionary adjustment of mutation rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 1045–1049
Nöthel H, Weber M (1976) Investigations on radiosensitive and radioresistant populations of Drosophily melanogaster VII. High relative radioresistance to the induction of sex-linked recessive lethals in stage-7 oocytes of RÖ I4. Mutat Res 36: 245–248
O’Hare K, Rubin GM (1983) Structures of P transposable elements and their sites of insertion and excision in the Drosophila melanosgaster genome. Cell 34: 25–35
Radman M, Wagner R (1986) Mismatch repair in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Genet 20: 523–538
Ramel C (1983) Polygenic effects and genetic changes affecting quantitative traits. Mutat Res 114: 107–116
Rio DC, Laski FA, Rubin GM (1986) Identification and immunochemical analysis of biologically active Drosophila P element transposase. Cell 44: 21–32
Rubin GM, Kidwell MG, Bingham PM (1982) The molecular basis of P-M hybrid dysgenesis: the nature of induced mutations. Cell 29: 987–994
Rusell WL, Hunsicker PR, Raymer GD, Steele MH, Stelzner KF, Thompson HM (1982) Dose-response curve for ethylnitrosourea-induced specificlocus mutations in mouse spermatogonia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 3589–3591
Sankaranarayanan K, Sobels FH (1976) Radiation genetics. In: Ashburner M, Novitski E (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic press, Lond, vol lc pp 1089–1250
Sturtevant AH (1937) Essays on evolution. I. On the effects of selection on mutation rate. Q Rev Biol 12: 464–467
Syvanen M (1984) The evolutionary implications of mobile genetic elements. Annu Rev Genet 18: 271–293
Voelker RA, Greenleaf AL, Gyurkovics H, Wisely GB, Huang SM, Searles LL (1984) Frequent imprecise excision among reversions of a P element-caused lethal mutation in Drosophila. Genetics 107: 279–294
Vogel E, Natarajan AT (1979) The relation between reaction kinetics and mutagenic action of mono-functional alkylating agents in higher eukayotic systems. I. Recessive lethal mutations and translocations in Drosophila. Mutat Res 62: 51–100
Vogel EW, Dusenbery RL, Smith PD (1985) The relation between reaction kinetics and mutagenic action. IV. The effects of the excicion-defective mei-9L1 and mus (2)201m mutants on alkylation-induced genetic damage in Drosophila. Mutat Res 149: 193–207
Williams LD, Shaw BR (1987) Protonated base pairs explain the ambiguous pairing properties of O6-methylguanine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 1779–1783
Yarosh DB (1985) The role of 06-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in cell survival, mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Mutat Res 145: 1–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nöthel, H. (1990). Mutagen-Mutation Equilibria in Evolution. In: Obe, G. (eds) Advances in Mutagenesis Research. Advances in Mutagenesis Research, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74955-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74955-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74957-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74955-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive