Planned Organizational Change: Theory, Model, Data and Simulation

  • Chanoch Jacobsen
  • Yitzhak Samuel
Conference paper

Abstract

Organizations have to adapt to their environments in order to survive (Lawrence and Lorsch, 1967; Weick, 1969; Galbraith, 1967). Hence, recurrent structural changes are strategic responses of organizations to the growing turbulence of modern society (e.g., Tichy, 1983). While most organizations can alter their strategies, structures and procedures to some extent, many changes do not achieve their stated goals because of inertial forces blocking the way (Hannan and Freeman, 1984). Many of the factors affecting organizational change processes have already been identified (cf. Zaltman and Duncan, 1977), but we still lack a comprehensive view that integrates the various interplaying forces (Nadler, 1981; Carnell, 1986).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carnell, C.A., 1986. Managing strategic change: An integrated approach. Long Range Planning, :105–15.Google Scholar
  2. Daft, R.L. 1986. Organization Theory and Design. St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar
  3. Downs, A. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  4. Galbraith, J. 1977. Organization Design. Reading, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49:149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hopwood, A.G. 1979. Towards the economic assessment of new forms of work organization. Pp.101–22 in C.L. Cooper and E. Mumford (eds.), The Quality of Working Life in Western and Eastern Europe. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  7. Jacobsen, C. and Bronson, R. 1987. Defining sociological concepts as variables for system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review, 3:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kanter, R.M. 1986. Managing the human side of change. Pp. 192–5 in G. Brehm and K. Becker (eds.), Managing and Organizing for Change. New York: Ginn Press.Google Scholar
  9. Krupp, S. 1972. Towards a theory of organizational change. Pp. 147–161 in Berger, Zelditch and Anderson (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  10. Lawler, E.E. 1986. High Involvement Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. 1967. Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. March, J.G. 1981. Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26:463–77.Google Scholar
  14. McPherson, L.F. III. 1965. Organizational Change: An Industrial Dynamics Approach. Industrial Management Review, 6(2):51–63.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, D. and Friesen, P. 1980. Archtypes of organizational transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25:268–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mirvis, P.M. and Macy, B.A. 1983. Evaluating program costs and benefits. Pp. 501–527 in S.E. Seashore, et al. (eds.), Assessing Organizational Change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Nadler, D. 1981. Managing organizational change: An integrative perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, :191–211.Google Scholar
  18. Tichy, N.M. 1983. Managing Strategic Change: Technical, Political, and Cultural Dynamics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Weick, K.E. 1969. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  20. Zaltman, G. and Duncan, R. 1977. Strategies for Planned Change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chanoch Jacobsen
    • 1
  • Yitzhak Samuel
    • 1
  1. 1.Technion — Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations