Skip to main content

Differential Indication for Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy

  • Conference paper
Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy
  • 127 Accesses

Abstract

The importance of being earnest in performing new methods of treating disc disease can be seen in sensational reports of newspapers and television and in hostile reactions of disappointed patients. Especially in such a large city as Berlin, where specialists for the spine are to be found in at least ten clinics, a bad result immediately forces the patient to go from one hospital to another and not seldom the danger arises for a modern method, and also the physician, to be discriminated. In order to avoid such risks as far as possible, we handle every new procedure extremely cautiously with restrictive deliberations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kambin P (1987) Mechanism of pain relief and research aspect of annular fenestration and percutaneous discectomy. International Symposium of Percutaneous Discectomy, Philadelphia, USA, March 1987

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kambin P, Gellman H (1983) Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine. Clin Orth Rel Res 174:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kambin P, Sampson S (1986) Posterolateral percutaneous suction-excision of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. Clin Orth Rel Res 207:27–43

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maroon JC, Onik G (1987) Percutaneous automated discectomy; a new method for lumbar disc removal. J Neurosurg 66:143–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Onik G et al. (1987) Automated percutaneous discectomy: Initial patient experience. Radiology 162/1:129–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weigert, M. (1989). Differential Indication for Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy. In: Mayer, H.M., Brock, M. (eds) Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74679-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74679-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74681-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74679-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics