Computer Modeling with a Protein Data Base

  • T. A. Jones
Conference paper
Part of the Colloquium der Gesellschaft für Biologische Chemie 14.–16. April 1988 in Mosbach/Baden book series (MOSBACH, volume 39)

Abstract

The widespread use of computer graphics in the last 10 years has contributed to the spread and ease with which crystallographers can solve and refine macromolecular structures. In particular computer graphics modeling programs have been used to construct the initial model in electron density maps, and to remove model errors during crystallo- graphic refinement (see Jones 1987, for a short review). In much of this interactive work, the experience of the modeler has played an important (sometimes critical) role. This manifests itself in an ability to recognize and use structural features. An intimate knowledge of protein stereochemistry can be of great use in constructing and modifying a known structure. The modeling program, Frodo (Jones 1978, 1982) provided a set of tools to construct and manipulate fragments into maps in a straightforward general way. These fragments could be α- helices, β-strands or various types of turns, for example. In our recent work (Jones and Thirup 1986) we have generalized these concepts so that the fragments come directly from a data base of well refined protein structures.

Keywords

Carbonyl Macromolecule Lysozyme Editing Mora 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Greer J (1974) Three-dimensional pattern recognition: An approach to automated interpretation of electron density maps of proteins. J Mol Biol 82:279–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jones TA (1978) A graphics model building and refinement system for macromolecules. J Appl Crystallogr 11:268–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jones TA (1982) FRODO: a graphics fitting program for macromolecules. In: Sayre D (ed) Computational crystallography, Oxford University Press, pp 303–317Google Scholar
  4. Jones TA (1987) Electron density fitting with computer graphics: A review and a glimpse. In: Moras D, Drenth J, Strandberg B, Suck D, Wilson K (eds) Crystallography in molecular biology, Plenum Press, pp 125–130Google Scholar
  5. Jones TA, Liljas L (1984) Crystallographic refinement of macromolecules having noncrystal lographic symmetry. Acta Crystallogr A40:50–57Google Scholar
  6. Jones TA, Thirup S (1986) Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J 5:819–822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones TA, Bergfors T, Sedzik J, Unge T (1988) The three-dimensional structure of P2 myelin protein. EMBO J 7:1597–1604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kraulis PJ, Jones TA (1987) Determination of three-dimensional protein structures from nuclear magnetic resonance data using fragments of known structures. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 2:188–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pique M (1984) Work in progress at UNC Chapel Hill NIH research resource. J Mol Graphics 2:59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ponder JW, Richards FM (1987) Tertiary templates for proteins: use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Mol Biol 4:775–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schneider G, Lindqvist Y, Brändén C-I, Lorimer G (1986) Three-dimensional structure of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from rhodospirillum rubrum at 2.9 Å resolution. EMBO J 5:3409–3415PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. A. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular BiologyUniversity of UppsalaUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations