Advertisement

Evaluation of the Cervix

  • Gerhard Bernaschek
  • Josef Deutinger
  • Alfred Kratochwil

Abstract

The diagnosis of cervical incompetence is generally based on a prior history of late abortions or preterm deliveries. In the absence of such antecedents or in primigravidae, about the only way to diagnose cervical incompetence in the past was by vaginal examination. However, this examination provides no objective information on cervical shortening. Only about half the true cervical length is accessible to the palpating finger, and the interpretation of possible cervical shortening is highly subjective. Moreover, dilatation of the cervical canal is detectable by palpation only if it extends to the external os. Thus, palpation can detect an incompetent cervix only at a relatively late stage, and treatment is correspondingly delayed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown JE, Thieme GA, Shah DM, Fleischer AC, Boehm FH (1986) Transabdominal and transvaginal endosonography: evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155: 721–726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Christopher CR, Spinelli A, Collins ML (1979) Ultrasound detection of hourglass membranes with funic presentation. Obstet Gynecol 54:130–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hendricks CH, Bienner WE, Kraus G (1970) Normal cervical dilatation pattern in late pregnancy and labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 106:1066Google Scholar
  4. Mahran M (1980) The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of the incompetent cervix. In: Kurjak A (ed) Recent advances in ultrasound diagnosis, vol 2. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, p 505Google Scholar
  5. Michaels WH, Montgomery C, Karo J, Temple J, Ager J, Olson J (1986) Ultrasound differentiation of the competent from the incompetent cervix: prevention of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154: 537–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Parikh MN, Mehta AC (1961) Internal cervical os during the second half of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 68: 818–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Parulekar SG, Kiwi R (1988) Dynamic incompetent cervix uteri. J Ultrasound Med 7: 481–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pfersmann C, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G (1986) Die Zervixlänge gegen Ende der Schwangerschaft - eine sonographische Studie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 46: 213–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sarti DA, Sample WF, Hobel CJ, Staisch KJ (1979) Ultrasonic visualisation of a dilated cervix during pregnancy. Radiology 130: 417–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Varma TR, Patel RH, Pillai U (1987) Ultrasonic assessment of cervix in “at risk” patients. Int J Gyneaecol Obstet 25: 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zemlyn S (1981) The length of the uterine cervix and its significance. J Clin Ultrasound 9: 267–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Bernaschek
    • 1
  • Josef Deutinger
    • 1
  • Alfred Kratochwil
    • 2
  1. 1.II. Universitäts-Frauenklinik WienWienAustria
  2. 2.Allgemeines öffentliches Krankenhaus der Kurstadt BadenBadenGemany

Personalised recommendations