Abstract
Looking at the history of psychology, one may notice a definite parallel in the currents and countercurrents of scientific interest devoted, on the one hand, to the phenomena of emotion, and on the other, to those of suggestion. Both interests reached a climax at the beginning of the discipline; and both fell into disrepute because they were considered speculative and not amenable to methodologically sound and truly objective, operationally oriented scientific research. The name and fate, the rise and fall, of McDougall (1910, 1923) highlights that mainstream development of the discipline. Presently, however, emotion is having a strong comeback as a research topic in the field, with more and more journals and editorial boards being responsive to papers in this area. The present volume, which would have been unthinkable not so long ago, might testify that suggestion, too, is returning to the scientific scene. That coincidence is no happenstance: the early notion of suggestion had a strong connotative, if not denotative semantic link to the notion of emotional contagion (Gefühlsansteckung). As will be shown below, both phenomenologically and according to present theorizing, there is a decisively emotional component involved in the process of suggestion that can be seen on close analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asch, S.E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie.
Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against an unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, No. 9 (Whole No. 416).
Bales, R.F., & Cohen, S.P. (1979). Symlog:A manual for the case study of groups. New York: Macmillan.
Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: Free.
Duffy, E. (1941). An explanation of “emotional” phenomena without the use of the concept “emotion”. Journal of General Psychology, 25, 283–293.
Duffy, E. (1962). Activation and behavior. New York: Wiley.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hovland, C.I. (1954). Effects of the mass media of communication. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1062–1103). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hull, C.L. (1933). Hypnosis and suggestibility. New York: Appleton.
Lazarus, R.S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.
Lazarus, R.S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39, 124–129.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Row.
Lippitt, R., Polansky, F., Redl, F., & Rosen, S. (1952). The dynamics of power. Human Relations, 5, 37–64.
McDougall, W. (1910). Introduction to social psychology. Boston: Luce.
McDougall, W. (1923). Outline of psychology. New York: Scribner.
McGuire, W.J. (1968). Personality and attitude change: An information-processing theory. In A.G. Greenwald, T.C. Brock, & T.M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 171–196). New York: Academic.
McGuire, W.J. (1972). Attitude change: The information-processing paradigm. In C.G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 108–141). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
McGuire, W.J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 233–346). New York: Random House.
Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Millman, S. (1965). The relationship between anxiety, learning, and opinion change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
Murray, H.A. (1951). Toward a classification of interaction. In T. Parsons & E.A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 434–464). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Schwanenberg, E. (1978, March). Notes on affectivity, general and social. Paper presented at the 4th general meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Weimar, East Germany.
Schwanenberg, E. (1981). Sozialer Affekt: Konstruktüberprüfung des Schachter-Paradigmas (Social affect: Examining the constructs of the Schachter paradigm). In W. Michaelis (Ed.), Bericht über den 32. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Zürich 1980 (Vol. 1, pp. 317–324). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Schwanenberg, E. (1984a, May). World of probability and world of meaning: Vista on affect or Miller, Galanter, and Pribram revisited. Paper presented at the 4th general meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Schwanenberg, E. (1984b, July). Looking at the meaning world in groups. Paper presented at the 2nd European workshop “SYMLOG and Interaction in Groups”, Konstanz, FRG.
Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, No. 187, 60.
Thibaut, J.W., & Kelley, H.H. (1969). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.
Zajonc, R.B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117–123.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schwanenberg, E. (1989). Suggestion as Social Biasing of Meaning Tests: A Heiderian Extension of the Miller, Galanter, and Pribram Paradigm — Catalyzing McGuire’s Theory of Attitude Change. In: Gheorghiu, V.A., Netter, P., Eysenck, H.J., Rosenthal, R. (eds) Suggestion and Suggestibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73875-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73875-3_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73877-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73875-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive