40-H2 EEG and Hypnotizability During Mental Activity

  • F. S. Marucci
  • V. De Pascalis
  • M. P. Penna
  • E. Pessa


In recent years, research into psychophysiological correlates of cognitive strategies and performance has examined the following relationships: (a) between EEG activity and hypnotic responsiveness; (b) between hypnotizability and cognitive processing in perception, mental imagery, and memory; and (c) between EEG rhythms, hemispheric dominance, and visual perception processes with respect to mental imagery and memory. In particular, EEG correlates of individual differences in cognitive abilities and hypnotic susceptibility have been examined.


Left Hemisphere Visual Perception Mental Rotation Mental Imagery Hemispheric Specificity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acosta, E., Jr., & Crawford, E.J. (1985). Iconic memory and hypnotizability: processing speed, skill, or strategy differences. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 33,3, 236–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apkinar, S., Ulett, G.A., & Itil, T.M. (1971). Hypnotizability predicted by digital computer-analyzed EEG pattern. Biological Psychiatry, 3, 387–392.Google Scholar
  3. Battig, W.F. (1979). Are the important “individual differences” between or within individuals? Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 546–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers, K.S. (1971). Sex and susceptibility as moderator variables in the relationship of creativity and hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78, 93–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, L.A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional forms. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, L.A., & Podgorny, P. (1976). Mental transformations and visual comparisons processing: Effects of complexity and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 503–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, L.A., & Shepard, R.N. (1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In W.G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 75–176). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, H.J. (1985). Cognitive flexibility dissociation, and hypnosis. Presidential address presented at the American Psychological Association, Division 30 meeting, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
  9. Crawford, H.J., Stolnick, B., Benson, D., Gur, R.E., & Gur, R.C. (1985). Regional cerebral blood flow in hypnosis and hypnotic analgesia. Paper presented at the 10th international congress of hypnosis and psychosomatic medicine, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  10. De Pascalis, V., Marucci, F.S., Penna, M.P., & Pessa, E. (1987). Hemispheric activity of 40 Hz EEG during recall of emotional events: differences between low and high hypnotizables. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 5, 167–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Pascalis, V., Silveri, A., & Palumbo, G. (1988). EEG asymmetry during covert mental activity and its relationship with hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36(1), 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farah, M.J. (1984). The neurological basis of mental imagery: A componential analysis. Cognition, 18, 245–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farah, M.J., Gazzaniga, M.S., Holtzman, J.D., & Kosslyn, S.M. (1985). A left hemisphere basis for visual mental imagery. Neuropsychologia, 23(1), 115–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finke, A.R., & McDonald, H. (1978). Two personality measures relating hypnotic susceptibility to absorption. International Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 3, 178–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galin, D., & Ellis, R. (1975). Asymmetry in evoked potentials and an index of lateralized cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia, 13, 45–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galin, D., & Orstein, R. (1972). Lateral specialization of cognitive mode: An EEG study. Psychophysiology, 9, 412–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glass, A., Butler, S.R., & Carter, J.C. (1984). Hemispheric asymmetry of EEG alpha activation: Effects of gender and familiar handedness. Biological Psychology, 19, 169–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gruzelier, J.H., & Brow, J.D. (1985). Psychophysiological evidence for a state theory of hypnosis and susceptibility. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 29, 287–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gur, R.C., & Gur, R.E. (1974). Handedness, sex and eyedness as moderating variables in the relation between hypnotic susceptibility and functional brain asymmetry. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 635–643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hilgard, E.R. (1977). Divided Consciousness: Multiple control in human thought and action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Hilgard, E.R. (1981). Imagery and imagination in American psychology. Journal of Mental Imagery, 5, 5–66.Google Scholar
  22. Ingram, R.E., Saccuzzo, D.P., McNeill, B.W., & McDonald, R. (1979). Speed of information processing in high and low susceptibility subjects: A preliminary study, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27(1), 42–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Karlin, A.R., Cohen, A., & Goldstein, L. (1983). A shift to the right: EEG-changes from rest to hypnotic induction. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  25. Loring, D.W., & Sheer, D.E. (1984). Laterality of 40 Hz EEG and EMG during cognitive performance. Psychophysiology, 21, 34–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacLeod-Morgan, C. (1979). Hypnotic susceptibility, EEG theta and alpha waves, and hemispheric specificity. In G.D. Burrows, D.R. Collinsos, & L. Dennerstein (Eds.), Hypnosis 1979. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. MacLeod-Morgan, C., & Lack, L. (1982). Hemispheric specificity: A physiological concomitant of hypnotizability. Psychophysiology, 19, 687–690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marks, D.F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Metzler, J., & Shepard, R.N. (1974). Transformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects. In R.L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 147–201). New York: +Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  31. Ray, W.J., Morrel, M., Frediani, A., & Tucker, D.M. (1976). Sex differences and lateral specialization of hemispheric functioning. Neuropsychologia, 14, 391–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robbins, K., & McAdams, D. (1974). Interhemispheric alpha asymmetry and imagery mode. Brain and Language, 1, 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sabourin, M.E., Cutcomb, S.D., & Pribram, K.H. (1986, July). EEG correlates of hypnotic susceptibility and hypnotic trance: spectral analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, Vienna.Google Scholar
  34. Sheehan, P.W. (1966). Accuracy and vividness of visual images. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheehan, P.W. (1967). A shortened form of Betts’ questionnaire upon mental imagery. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 386–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sheer, D.E. (1976). Focused arousal and 40 Hz EEG. In R.M. Knight & D.J. Bakker (Eds.), The neuropsychology of learning disorders, (pp. 71–87). Baltimore: University Park.Google Scholar
  37. Shepard, R.N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shor, R.E., & Orne, E.C., (1962). Harvard Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
  39. Sigman, A., Phillips, K.C., & Clifford, B. (1985). Attentional concomitants of hypnotic susceptibility. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 2, 69–75.Google Scholar
  40. Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R., & Lushene, R. (1970). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) test manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
  41. Spydell, J.D., Ford, M.R., & Sheer, D.E. (1979). Task dependent cerebral lateralization of the 40 Hz EEG rhythm. Psychophysiology, 16, 347–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spydell, J.D., & Sheer, D.E. (1982). Effect of problem solving on right and left hemisphere 40 Hertz EEG activity. Psychophysiology, 19, 420–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stelmach, G.E., & Scott Kelso, J.A. (1977). Memory processes in motor control. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and performance: Vol. 6 (pp. 719–739). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Sturr, J.F., & Church, K.L. (1986). Hypnotizability and speed of visual information processing. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34(3), 234–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trotman, S.C.A., & Hammond, G.R. (1979). Sex differences in task-dependent EEG asymmetries. Psychophysiology, 16, 429–431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zikmund, V. (1972). Physiological correlates of visual imagery. In P.W. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 355–387). New York: Academic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. S. Marucci
  • V. De Pascalis
  • M. P. Penna
  • E. Pessa

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations