Skip to main content

Current Status of Urinary Stone Therapy

  • Conference paper
Laser Lithotripsy
  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

Treatment of calculi in the upper urinary tract has undergone a complete change in recent years. Whereas in the period before 1980 open surgery was the only way of removing stones from the ureter or the kidney, currently open surgery represents only about 1% of the procedures applied for the removal of urinary calculi. This dramatic change has been brought about by the development of new forms of lithotripsy. Basically two different principles are employed: contact-free lithotripsy by means of extracorporeally induced Shockwaves (ESWL) and lithotripsy under endoscopic guidance using electro-hydraulic, ultrasonic and, most recently, Laser as energy source. Endoscopic guided lithotripsy is performed in the renal collecting system as percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and in the ureter as ureteroscopy (URS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Brannen G. E., Bush W. H., Correa R. J., Gibbons R. P., Elder J. S.: Kidney stone removal: percutaneous versus surgical lithotomy. J. Urol. 133: 6 (1985).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaussy Ch., Schmiedt E., Jocham D., Brendel W., Forssmann B., Walther V.: First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidneystones by Shockwaves. J. Urol. 127: 417 (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaussy C., Fuchs G.: ESWL: what is proven, what is controversial. IV. World Congress on Endourology and ESWL, Madrid (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drach G. W.: Report of the United States Cooperative study of Extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy. J. Urol. 135: 1127 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dretler S. P., Watson G., Parrish J. A., Murray S.: Pulsed Dye Laser Fragmentation of Ureteral Calculi: Initial Clinical Experience. J. Urol. 137: 386 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenberger F., Rassweiler J.: Upper ureteral calculi — push or bang? IV. World Congress on Endourology and ESWL, Madrid (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchs G., Miller K., Raßweiler J., Eisenberger, F.: One year experience with the Dornier Lithotripter. Eur. Urol. 11: 145 (1985).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs G., Lupu A. N., Chaussy C: Treatment of ureteral stones: controversies and current differential indications. IV. World Congress on Endourology and ESWL, Madrid (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Graff J., Pastor J., Mach P., Michel W., Funke P. J., Senge Th.: Extra-corporeal Shockwave (ESWL)-treatment of ureteral stones — an analysis of 417 cases. J. Urol. 137: 143A, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graff J., Pastor J., Herberhold D., Hankemeier U., Senge Th.: Technical modifications of the Dornier HM-3 lithotripter with an improved anesthesia technique. World J. Urol. 5: 202 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hofmann R., Hartung R., Geißdörfer K., Ascherl R., Erhardt W., Schmidt-Kloiber H., Reichel E.: Laser Induced Shock Wave Lithotripsy (LIS L) — Biologic Effects and First Clinical Application. Laser Med. Surg. 3: 247 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huffmann J. L., Bagley D. H., Schoenberg H. W. Lyon E. S.: Transurethral removal of large ureteral and renal pelvic calculi using ureteroscopic ultrasonic lithotripsy. J. Urol. 130: 31, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Libby J., Griffith D. G.: Large calculi and ESWL: is morbidity minimized by ureteral stents? J. Urol. 135: 182 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jenkins A.: ESWL treatment of ureteral calculi. J. Urol. 135: 182A (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lingeman J. E., Newman D. M., Mertz H. H. O., Mosbaugh Ph.G., Steele R. E., Knapp P. M., Shirell W.: Management of upper ureteral calculi with ESWL. IV. World Congress on Endourology and ESWL, Madrid (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lingeman J. E.: Extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy — the Methodist Hospital experience. J. Urol. 135: 1134 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lingeman J. E.: Current concepts on the relative efficacy of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy. World J. Urol. 5:229 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyon E. S., Huffman J. L., Bagley D. H.: Ureteroscopy and ureteropyeloscopy. Urology 23: 29, (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayo M. E., Krieger J. N., Rudd T. G.: Effect of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy on renal function. J. Urol. 133: 167 (1985).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller K., Gumpinger R., Fuchs G., Rassweiler J., Eisenberger F.: 160 cases of ureteroscopy. J. Urol. 133/2: 171 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller K., Fuchs G., Rassweiler J., Eisenberger F.: Treatment of ureteral stone disease: the role of ESWL and endourology. World J. Urol. 3: 53, (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller K., Bubeck j. R., Hautmann R.: Extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi. Eur. Urol. 12: 305, (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller K., Bachor R., Hautmann R.: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy/ESWL versus ureteral stent/ESWL for the treamtent of large renal calculi and staghorn stones: a prospective randomized study. V. World Congress on Endourology and ESWL, Cairo (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miller K., Hautmann R.: Treatment of distal ureteral calculi with ESWL: experience with more than 100 consecutive cases. World J. Urol. 5: 259 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Müller S. C., v. Haverbeke J., El Seweifi A., Alken P.: Der hohe Harnleiterstein — ein Problem trotz extrakorporaler Stoßwellenlithotripsie. Akt. Urol. 16:294 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rassweiler J., Hath U., Lutz K., Eisenberger F.: In-situ ESWL beim tiefen Harnleiterstein. Akt. Urol. 17: 328, (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Snyder J. A., Rosenblum J. L., Smith A. D.: Endourological removal of staghorn calculi in the elderly: analysis of 42 cases. J. Endourol. 1: 123 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zwergel U., Neisius D., Zwergel T., Ziegler M.: Results and clinical management of extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy (EPL) in 1321 consecutive treatments. World J. Urol. 5: 213 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Miller, K. (1988). Current Status of Urinary Stone Therapy. In: Steiner, R.W. (eds) Laser Lithotripsy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73864-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73864-7_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73866-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73864-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics