Advertisement

The Long Search for a Viable Method of C-terminal Sequencing

  • G. E. Tarr

Abstract

The history of C-terminal protein sequencing dates back at least to 1926 when the thiocyanate degradation was introduced by Schlack and Kumpf (see reviews by Loudon et al 1977; Ward 1986; Rangarajan 1988 for citations of original literature). Many chemical methods have been introduced since then, touted by their inventors and by the few who later improved them. But these methods have rarely contributed essential - or even useful - sequence information and none have demonstrated the capacity for extended degradations with all common residues. But recent improvements in a few of the half-dozen or so currently active methods have convinced many that the grail of C-terminal sequencing is at last within reach. When I began to prepare for this Conference, I had hoped to be able to compare the performance of these methods with small test substrates, but unfortunately, time and resources did not permit.

Keywords

Edman Degradation Protein Sequence Analysis Cleavage Efficiency Methyl Sulfate Yield Amino Acid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biemann K, Scoble HA (1987) Characterization by tandem mass spectrometry of structural modifications in proteins. Science 237: 992–998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black SD, Coon MJ (1986) Comparative structures of P-450 cytochromes. In: Montellano PRO (ed) Cytochrome P-450 Plenum, p 161Google Scholar
  3. Caprioli RM, Fan T (1986) Peptide sequence analysis using exopeptidases with molecular analysis of the truncated polypeptides by mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 154: 596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gould S, Marti O, Drake B, Hellemans L, Bracker CE, Hansma PK, Keder NL, Eddy MM, Stucky GD (1988) Molecular resolution images of amino acid crystals with the atomic force microscope. Nature 332: 332–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayashi R (1988) Enzymatic methods of protein/peptide sequencing from carboxyterminal end. In: Bhown AS (ed) Protein/peptide sequence analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL, p 145Google Scholar
  6. Hunt DF, Yates JR, Shabanowitz J (1987) Protein sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. In: Walsh KA (ed) Methods in protein sequence analysis 1986. Humana, Clifton NJ, p 149Google Scholar
  7. Isobe T, Ichimura T, Okuyama T (1986) Identification of the C-terminal portion of a protein by comparative peptide mapping. Anal Biochem 115: 135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson L, Tarr G (1987) C-terminal sequence of proteins: rapid isolation and Edman sequencing of C-terminal peptides from digests. In: Walsh KA (ed) Methods in protein sequence analysis 1986. Humana, Clifton NJ, p 351Google Scholar
  9. Jones BN (1986) Microsequence analysis by enzymatic methods. In: Shively JE (ed) Methods of protein microcharacterization. Humana, Clifton NJ, p 337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klemm P (1984) Carboxy-terminal sequence determination of proteins and peptides with carboxypeptidase Y. In: Walker JM (ed) Methods in molecular biology vol 1. Humana, p 255Google Scholar
  11. Krutzsch HC (1983) Polypeptide sequencing with dipeptidyl peptidases. Meth Enzymol 91: 511–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krutzsch HC (1988) Protein/peptide sequence analysis by mass spectrometry. In: Bhown AS (ed) Protein/peptide sequence analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL, p 161Google Scholar
  13. Loudon GM, Parham ME, Miller MJ (1977) Approaches to carboxy-terminal sequencing and end-group determinations in peptides. In: van Tamelen EE (ed) Perspectives in bioorganic chemistry. Academic Press, New York, v 3Google Scholar
  14. Rangarajan M (1988) Chemical methods of amino acid sequence analysis from carboxyterminal end. In: Bhown AS (ed) Protein/peptide sequence analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL, p 135Google Scholar
  15. Ringe D (1988) An extra dimension to NMR Nature 332: 303Google Scholar
  16. Ward CW (1986) Carboxy terminal sequence analysis. In: Darbre A (ed) Practical protein chemistry. John Wiley, London, p 491Google Scholar
  17. Yamashita S (1971) Sequential degradation of polypeptides from the carboxyl ends. Biochim Biophys Acta 229: 301–309PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. E. Tarr
    • 1
  1. 1.Immunobiology, Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations