Advertisement

The Contralateral Breast: Bilateral Primary Breast Cancer

  • A. H. Tulusan
  • G. Ronay
  • R. Adam
  • M. Reitzenstein
Conference paper

Abstract

One of the most interesting phenomena in breast cancer is its bilaterality, which not only reveals the biologic nature and natural history of the disease, but is especially important because it allows the possibility of early detection of breast cancer in a high-risk population to be assessed. Although Foote and Stewart [2] had already defined patients with the greatest risk of breast cancer as those with a past history of the disease, interest in bilateral breast cancer was mainly stimulated by the investigative results of Urban. Recently Veronesi et al. [7] observed, in his study of conservative treatment for breast cancer, that 15 contralateral — and only 7 new ipsilateral — primary cancers arose. It is very interesting to consider the role of adjuvant prophylactic radiotherapy in preventing new primary contralateral tumors. Should the contralateral breast also be treated with radiotherapy? In fact, the difficulty of selecting patients at risk has led some authors to conclude that prophylactic mastectomy of the contralateral breast is sometimes justifiable [3]. It is, however, not certain that every breast cancer patient has, or will develop, a second primary in the contralateral breast.

Keywords

Breast Cancer Contralateral Breast Contralateral Breast Cancer Prophylactic Mastectomy Bilateral Breast Cancer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fisher ER, Fisher B, Sass R, Wickerham L (1984) Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol no 4). XI. Bilateral breast cancer. Cancer 54: 3002–3011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foote FW, Stewart FW (1945) Comparative studies of cancerous versus non cancerous breast I and II. Ann Surg 121: 6, 197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leis HP (1980) Managing the remaining breast. Cancer 46: 1026–1030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lesser ML, Rosen PP, Kinne DW (1982) Multicentricity and bilaterality in invasive breast carcinoma. Surgery 91: 234–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tulusan AH, Egger H, Schneider M-L, Willgeroth F (1982) A contribution to the natural history of breast cancer. IV. Lobular carcinoma in situ and its relation to breast cancer. Arch Gynecol 231: 219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Urban JA, (1985) Bilateral breast cancer revealed by biopsy of the opposite breast. In: Zander J, Baltzer J (eds) Early breast cancer, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veronesi U, Zucali R, Luini A, Belli F, Crispino S, Merson M (1985) Conservative treatment of breast cancer with the “QU.A.R.T.” technique. In: Zander J, Baltzer J (eds) Early breast cancer. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wolfe JN, Albert S, Belle S, Salane M (1982) Breast parenchymal patterns: Analysis of 332 incident breast carcinomas. AJR 138: 113–118PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. H. Tulusan
  • G. Ronay
  • R. Adam
  • M. Reitzenstein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations